98 THE BOTANICAL MAGAZINE. [Vol. xxxvi. n. 428. 



mer, the ellipsonal theory advanced by Fujn could not be taken 

 into account in the study of chromosomes and chromomeres. 



Literature cited 



1. Davis, B.M. (1909) Cytological studies on Oenothera I. Pollen development of 



Oenothera grandiflora. Ann. of Bot. XXIII, pp. 551 — 571. 



2. Davis, B.M. (1915) A method of obtaining complete germination of seeds in 



Oenothera, and of recording the residue of sterile seed-like-structures. The 

 Proc. Nat. Acad, of Sci. Vol. I, pp. 360—363. 



3. Fujii, K. (1920) On the conception of Id and the question of its trans- 



mutability. Bot. Mag., Tokyo. Vol. XXXIV, pp. (99)— (125). 



4. Gates, R.R. (1911) Pollen formations in Oenothera gigas. Ann. of Bot. XXV, 



pp. 909—940. 



5. Gates, B.B.. (1915) The mutation factor in evolution. London. 



6. Gates, E.R. and Thomas Nesta (1914) A cytological study of O. mut. lata and 



O. mut. semilata in relation to mutation. Quart. Journ.'Micr. Sci. LIX, pp. 

 523—571. 



