1873.] 293 (Hagen. 
PHRYGANINA. 
1. Phryganea cinerea Walk. Hag. Syn., 252, 1. 
No. 95. Phryganea humeralis Harris. (‘‘ uncertain,” note by Mr. 
Say). Dr. Pickering, Salem; and Maine, Randall, 1836. 
There are two specimens, of course that marked u was the first, 
and perhaps Dr. Harris’ name refers to this specimen (see below 
Phr. interrupta). ‘The specimen from Maine, only wings, is a male of 
Phr. cinerea. 
2. Phryganea interrupta Say. 
Limnophilus interruptus Hag. Syn., 256, 7. 
No. 95, the specimen from Salem, Pickering; a male, only wings 
and some fragments of lees. I had not before seen this species, but 
two females in the Cambridge collection agreeing with Mr. Say’s 
description and figure, show that his species belongs to the genus 
Phryganea. I have seen no male, but I believe the fragment in the 
Harris collection, from the neuration of the wings, and the largely 
dark colored hind-wings, belongs here. 
3. Phryganea vestita Walk. Hag. Syn., 263, 2. 
No. 122. Cambridge, June 15, 1834, New York, Mr Calverley. 
Four specimens in bad condition, two 6, and two ?. Ph. com- 
mixta Walk., is the male of this species. 
4, Phryganea improba. Hag. 
No. 133. Phryganea. Catskill Mts. N. York, June 15, 1843, Mr. 
H. Gray. 
A female, only fragments, but agreeing with the specimens in my 
collection. Perhaps it is a more northern species; my specimens are 
all from the Saskatshawan River and Hudson’s Bay, by R. Kenni- 
cott. 
5. Neuronia pardalis Walk. Hag. Syn., 2502, Harris Cor- 
resp,, p- 333. 
No. 125. Phryganea. N. Hampshire, Mr. Leonard. 
6? in bad condition. This beautiful species is rare ; at least I 
have only seen the types in the British Museum, a pair in Mr. 
Atwood’s, and the pair in Harris’ collections, and a female from the 
White Mts., N. H.,in the Cambridge collection. The genital parts in 
Harris’ specimens are fortunately well preserved. 
6. Neuronia dossuaria Say. 
Limnophilus dossuarius Hag. Syn., 255, 6. 
No. 102. Phryganea plurifaria Say Mss. (Say’s determ.). Dublin, 
N. H., Mr. Leonard. 
