

1875.1 481 [Scudder. 



1. T. viridifaseiata Harr., Ins. inj. Veg., 1st ed., 147. 

 (virginiana Fabr.) 



Acridium viridifasciatum De Geer, Mem., in, 498, pi. 42, fig. 6 ; lb., 

 Goeze, Gesch., in, 325, pi. 42, fig. 6; Retz., Gen. et. Spec. Ins., 98. 



Gryllus {Locusta) viridifasciatus Goeze, Beytr., n, 115. 



Locusta viridifaseiata Harr., Catal., 56. 



Locusta {Tragocephala) viridifaseiata Harr., Ins., inj. Veg., 1st. ed., 

 147; 2d ed., 158; 3d ed., 182, pi. 3, fig. 2. 



Gompkocerus viridifasciatus Ubl., in Harr., Ins. inj. Veg., 3d ed., 

 181. 



Tragocephala viridifaseiata Scudd., Bost. Journ. Nat- Hist., vn, 

 461 ; Thorn., Syn. Acrid. N. Am., 103, pi., fig. 3; Glov.,111. Ortb. N. 

 Amer., pi. 5, fig. 9 ; Stal, Rec, Orth., i, 119. 



Gryllus virginianus Fabr., Syst. Ent., 291; lb., Spec. Ins., I, 368; 

 lb., Ent. Syst., n, 57; Turt., Linn. Syst. Nat., n, 562. 



Gryllus {Locusta) virginianus Goeze, Ent. Beytr., n, 106 Gmel., 

 Linn. Syst. Nat., i, iv, 2078. 



Acridium virginianum Oliv., Encycl. meth., vi, 224. 



Acridium {(Edipoda) virginianum De Haan, Bijdr. Kenn. Ortb., 143. 



(Edipoda virginiana Burm., Handb. Ent., n, 645. 



Gryllus {Locusta) Chrysomelas Gmel., Linn. Syst. Nat., I, iv, 2086; 

 Turt., Linn. Syst. Nat., n, 569. 



Acridium marginatum Oliv., Encycl. meth., vi, 225. 



Acridium hemipterum Pal. de Beauv., Ins., 145,. pi. 4, fig. 3. 

 (infuscata Harr.) 



Locusta {Tragocephala) infuscata Harr., Ins. inj. Veg., 1st ed., 147; 

 2ded., 158, 3d ed., 181. 



Gomplwcerus infuscatus Ubl., in Harr., Ins. inj. Veg., 3d ed., 181 ; 



Tragocephala infuscata Scudd., Bost. Journ. Nat. Hist., vn, 461. 

 Thorn., Syn. Acrid. N. Am., 102, pi., fig. 7 ; Glov., 111., Ortb., pi. 10, 

 fig. 10; Scudd., Geol. N. Hampsh,, i, 373. 



Locusta radiata Harr., Cat. 5.6. 



Locusta {Tragocephala) radiata Harr., Ins. inj. Veg., 1st ed., 148; 

 2d ed., 159; 3d ed., 183. 



Gomphocerus radiatus Ubl., in Harr., Ins. inj. Veg., 3d ed., 181. 



This species is not only exceedingly variable, but presents us with 

 an interesting case of dimorphism, which also appears to be re- 

 peated in T. cubensis. The two forms, for which the names virgin- 

 iana and infuscata are retained, differ from each other in the pres- 

 ence (in the former), or absence (in the latter) of bright green colors ; 



PROCEEDINGS B. S.. N„ H..— VOL. XVII. 31 JULY, 1875. 



