LITERATURE CITED 



(1) DUGGAE, B. M. 



1916. THE TEXAS ROOTROT FUNGUS AND ITS CONIDIAL STAGE. Ann. MO. 



Bot. Gard., vol. 3, p. 11-23, illus. 



(2) Durand, E. J. 



1911. THE DIFFERENTIAL STAINING OF INTERCELLULAR MYCELIUM. PhjtO- 



pathology, vol. 1, p. 129-130. 



(3) King, C. J. 



1923. cotton rootrot in Arizona. Jour. Agr. Research, vol. 23, p. 525- 



527. 



(4) 



1924. habits of the cotton rootrot fungus. Jour. Agr. Research, vol. 



26, p. 405-418, illus. 



(5) SCOFIELD, C. S. 



1919. cotton rootrot spots. Jour. Agr. Research, vol. 18, p. 305-310, 

 illus. 



(6) Shear, C. L. 



1907. new species of fungi. Bui. Torrey Bot. Club, vol. 34, p. 305-317. 



(7) 



1925. THE LIFE HISTORY OF THE TEXAS ROOT-ROT FUNGUS, OZONIUM OMNI- 



vorum shear. Jour. Agr. Research, vol. 30, p. 475-477, illus 



(8) Taubenhaus, J. J., and Killough, D. T. 



1923. TEXAS ROOTROT OF COTTON AND METHODS OF ITS CONTROL. TeX. Agl 



, * Exp. Sta. Bui. 307, 98 p., illus. 



(9) Vaughan, R. E. 



1914. A METHOD FOR THE DIFFERENTIAL STAINING OF FUNGOUS AND HOST 



cells. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard., vol. 1, p. 241-242. 



27 



