~ 
‘Anthropelogy. 907 
6. The second quinary divisions—those on either side of the 
= _ last two—to be termed hyper-dolichocephalic and hyper-brachy- 
= — Cephalic, with the respective limits of 65 to 69.9, and 85 to 89.9. 
7 7. The third quinary divisions to be called ultra-dolichocepha- 
lic and ultra-brachycephalic respectively, with limits of 60 to 
64.9, and 90 to 94.9. 
_ 8. The quinary division of the cephalic index to be extended 
in each direction as far as there are indices to classify. These 
divisions may be designated by their limits, or by the number of 
quinary divisions they are removed from the mesaticephalic 
division, that being considered o. 
ollected in a tabular form the division and nomenclature 
agreed upon is as follows: 
He 
t 3.. Ultra oF, oe pl 3. 60-65 excl 
3 2, Hyper-dolichocephalic 57 
1, Dolichocephalic. .... naL 
Aa E a S Pirae: 
t. Brachycephalic........... r8obs 
2. Hyper-brachy phal Petre ee eee renee eset ene rnnes oh ag lige 
- 3. Ultra-brachycephali a TR 
; 90- 
: — F. Anthrop. Inst., xvi, 17-20. 
; Tue Peasopy Museum.—The eighteenth and _ nineteenth an- 
nual reports, forming numbers 5 and 6 of volume m1, have just 
appeared. The greater portion of these reports refer to explora- 
tions in the Little Miami valley, Ohio. With the codperation of 
r. C. L. Metz, Professor Putnam has conducted a series of dig- 
_ £ings which are quite as remarkable for their thoroughness as 
for their Successful results. The plan has been to lay a mound, 
earthwork or cemetery on the dissecting table, to remove care- 
ra 
place the coverings of « 
bodi | ves 
& 
