1 engtli from the point of the nose to the tip of the tail. The 

 eyes and mouth are shown, and there are four bands across 

 the tail. Both the hind legs are represented, but only one 

 of the front limbs. A somewhat defective reproduction of 

 this figure was given by W. D. Campbell in 1899,' but its 

 colossal proportions induce me to incorporate it in my plate 

 for purposes of comparison. It appears to be a female. 



Fig. 6. A well drawn representation of a fish, 13 feet 6 

 inches long, is incised on the flat surface of a sandstone 

 rock almost level with the surrounding ground, about 130 

 yards south-westerly from La Perouse's monument, Parish 

 of Botany, County of Cumberland. It would appear that 

 the native artist made two attempts to reproduce the lower 

 division of the tail, at the origin of which there is an incised 

 line across the body of the fish. The mouth is open and 

 the eye is depicted by a small incised circle. 



On another large flat rock about six chains southerly from 

 the present drawing, is the outline of an immense fish, 38 

 feet 8 inches long, which 1 described at the meeting of the 

 Australasian Association for the Advancement of Science 

 held at Brisbane in 1895. 2 



Fig. 7. A bird, perhaps intended for a turkey bustard, 

 measuring 6 feet 2 inches from the top of the head to the 

 end of the tail, is incised on a sandstone rock on the right 

 bank of Byrne's Creek, a tributary of the Wollondilly river, 

 within Portion 5 of 100 acres, Parish of The Peaks, County 

 of Westmoreland. An old blackfellow, about 70 years of 

 age, named " George Biley," a member of the Gundungnrra 

 tribe which occupied that part of the country, told me that 

 he first saw this drawing when he was a boy, and even 



* Report. Vol. ti, p. 637, pi. 09, fig. 30. See also Bull. Soc. d'Anthrop. 



