DESCRIPTION OF PLATES. 



Plate I. Fig. 1. — Leptochloa mucronata Kunth. Athens. 111. The usual form. 

 Fig. 2. — Leptochloa viscida Beal. Mexican Boundary Survey, 

 Mearns No. 793. 

 II. Fig. 1. — Leptochloa doming ensis Trin. Florida, Simpson. Fig. 2. — 

 Leptochloa domingensis Trin. Hidalgo, Tex.. Nealley. 



III. Fig. 1. — Leptochloa scabra Nees. Louisiana. Langlois. This is the 



specimen upon which was based Leptochloa Langloisii Vasey. Fig. 

 2. — Leptochloa nealleyi Vasey. Texas. Nealley. Type specimen. 



IV. Fig. 1. — Leptochloa fascicularis. The prostrate form that has been 



named Diplachne procumbens Nash. Denver. Colo., Lettemian. 

 Fig. 2. — Leptochloa fascicularis. The western form which has been 

 named Diplachne tracyi Vasey. Reno. Nev. , Tracy. 216. Type speci- 

 men of D. tracyi Vasey. 

 V. Fig. 1. — Leptochloa fascicularis Gray. Sheffield. Mo. Bush No. 804. 

 The ordinary form. Fig. 2. — Leptochloa imbricata Thurb. Culti- 

 vated in Grass Garden, U. S. Department of Agriculture. 

 VI. Leptochloa floribunda Doell. The cotype of Diplachne halei Nash. 

 Louisiana, Hale. A fragmentary specimen, but interesting because 

 of its history. 



24 



o 



