B. P. I.—484. 
Poe PRESENT STATUS OF THE CHESTNUT 
BARK DISEASE. 
By Haven Metcatcr, Pathologist in Charge, and J. FRANKLIN COLLINS, Special 
Agent, Investigations in Forest Pathology. 
HISTORY OF THE CHESTNUT BARK DISEASE. 
In 1904 Mr. H. W. Merkel, of the New York Zoological Park, ob- 
served a disease which was destroying large numbers of chestnut 
trees in the city of New York. This disease is what is now known 
as the chestnut bark disease. Even at that time it is certain that it 
had spread over Nassau County and Greater New York, and had 
found lodgment in the adjacent counties of Connecticut and New 
Jersey. No earlier observation than this is recorded, but it is evident 
that the disease, which would of necessity have made slow advance 
at first, must have been in this general locality for a number of years 
in order to have gained such a foothold by 1904. Conspicuous as it 
is, it is strange that the fungus causing this disease was not observed 
er collected by any mycologist until May, 1905, when specimens were 
received from New Jersey by Mrs. F. W. Patterson, the Mycologist 
of the Bureau of Plant Industry. In the same year Dr. W. A. 
Murrill began his studies of the disease, publishing the results in the 
summer of 1906. By August, 1907, specimens received by this 
Bureau showed that the disease had reached at least as far south as 
Trenton, N. J., and as far north as Poughkeepsie, N. Y., and was 
spread generally over Westchester and Nassau counties, N. Y., Bergen 
County, N. J., and Fairfield County, Conn. 
PRESENT DISTRIBUTION. 
The present distribution of the chestnut bark disease is shown on 
the accompanying map (fig. 2). By this it will be seen that infec- 
tion is now complete in the general vicinity of the city of New York. 
Outside of this area the disease already occurs at scattering points 
in a number of States. In every ease its occurrence has been defi- 
nitely authenticated by specimens which have been examined micro- 
CER 
45 
