FOREST MANAGEMENT —CONTINUED. 



1847. HARTMAN, A. W. Results from mechanical fire 

 line construction. Fire Control Notes 8(1): 1-9. Jan. 

 1947. 1 F766Fi 



1848. LATHROP, C. H. Value and application of radio 

 in fire protection. J. Forestry 39:760-762. Sept. 1941. 



99.8 F768 



1849. MORAN, J. State fire equipment pool [Oregon]. 

 West. Forestry & Conserv. Assoc. Proc. 1941:B30-B34. 



99.9 W522 



1850. REYNOLDS, H. A. Use of patrol in prevention 

 and suppression of forest fires. J. Forestry 39:752-753. 

 Sept. 1941. 99.8 F768 



1851. SANDS, W. M. Reducing fire suppression costs 

 with radio communication. Fire Control Notes 6:81-84. 

 Apr. 1942. 1 F766Fi 



1852. WEBSTER, L. T. Organized fire suppression 

 crews versus pick-up labor. West. Forestry & Conserv. 

 Assoc. Proc. 1944:37-38. 99.9 W522 



Further information by T. H. Burgess, p. 39-40. 



(Hazard Reduction) 



1853. AMOS, E. G. Final report on the New England 

 Forest Emergency Fire Hazard Reduction Project. J. 

 Forestry 39:749-752. Sept. 1941. 99.8 F768 



Man-days consumed in brush disposal, p. 751. 



1854. COLVILL, L. L. Development and use of Forest 

 Service slashbuncher teeth. J. Forestry 44:89-91, illus. 

 Feb. 1946. 99.8 F768 



1855. LOWDEN, M. S. Slash disposal in selective cut 

 ponderosa pine stands. Fire Control Notes 8(4):35-40, 

 illus. Oct. 1947. 1 F766Fi 



1856. LYMAN, C. K. Principles of fuel reduction. 

 Northwest Sci. 18:44-48. May 1944. 470 N81 



1857. MCCULLOCH, W. F. Slash burning. Forestry 

 Chron. 20:111-118. June 1944. 99.9 F7623 



Effects on soil and reproduction as well as fire hazard 

 aspects. 



Also in Pulp & Paper Mag. Canada 45:620, 622, 624; 

 691-692, 694. July-Aug. 1944. 302.8 P96; and, under 

 title Common Sense Approach to Slash Burning Needed 

 for Effective Forestry, in Brit. Columbia Lumberman 

 28(2):27-28, 48, 50. Feb. 1944. 99.81 B77 



1858. MCHARG. The abnormal fire hazard problem. 

 West. Forestry & Conserv. Assoc. Proc. 1941:A39-A41. 

 99.9 W522 



Slash disposal costs. 

 Discussion, p. A42-A43. 



1859. MULLOY, G. A. Costs of brush burning. 

 Canada. Forest Serv. Silvic. Leaflet 19, 1 p. Feb. 1944. 

 99.9 C16S 



Also in Canada Lumberman 64(16):31. Aug. 15, 1944. 

 99.81 C16 



1860. REYNOLDS, C. Tree farms. West. Forestry & 

 Conserv. Assoc. Proc. 1943:13-14. 99.9 W522 



Cites economies of leaving slash. 



1861. RUSSELL, J. J., and MCCULLOCH, W. F. Slash 

 burning in western Oregon. Oreg. State Bd. Forestry B. 

 10, 26 p. Apr. 1944. 99.9 Or32B 



1862. WEAVER, H. Slash disposal on the Colville 

 Indian Reservation [Washington]. J. Forestry 44:81-88, 

 illus. Feb. 1946. 99.8 F768 



(Use of Airplanes) 



1863. BARROWS, J. S. Aerial bombing of forest fires. 

 West. Forestry & Conserv. Assoc. Proc. 38:20-21. 1947. 

 99.9 W522 



1864. BASTIAN, J. A. Forest fire protection. Ohio 

 Forest News 41:12-14. Jan. 1944. 99.8 Oh32 



Compares records of fires in areas patrolled by air- 

 plane with areas covered by tower observations. 



1865. BOSWORTH, J. Have we gone far enough in the 

 use of airplanes? Fire Control Notes 6:95-99, 102. July 

 1942. 1 F766Fi 



Emphasis on costs saving. 



1866. HAND, R. L„, and HARRIS, H. K. Preliminary 

 report on aerial detection study. Fire Control Notes 

 8(l):28-32. Jan. 1947. 1 F766Fi 



1867. KERR, E. J. Sky-fighters of the forest, para- 

 chutists are saving time, money and timber in the war 

 against fire in the critical Northwest forests. Amer. 

 Forests 49:431-433, 462, illus. Sept. 1943. 99.8 F762 



1868. LINDH, A. G. Parachuting fire fighters. J. 

 Forestry 39:160-169, illus. Feb. 1941.. 99.8 F768 



Experiments carried on by U. S. Forest Service in 

 Region 1. Comparison of parachute and ground crew 

 suppression time and operating cost. 



FOREST MANAGEMENT —CONTINUED 



1869. LUNDRIGAN, M„ Report on aerial fire control 

 activities. Missoula, Mont., U. S. Forest Serv., 1940. 

 41 p. 1.9621 R1R29 



Compiled from project records. Includes costs. 



1870. U. S. FOREST SERV. Use of aircraft in forestry. 

 Washington, 1941. 13 p. 1.962 A2Us23 



Includes appropriations. 



Fire Damage 



1871. AMCDON, G. B. The price we pay for careless- 

 ness with fire. Conserv. Volunteer 8(47):12-14. July/ 

 Aug. 1945. 279.8 C765 



Causes and costs of forest fires in Minnesota. 



1872. BARRETT, L. I., JEMISON, G. M., and 

 KEETCH, J. J. A metnod for appraising forest fire 

 damage in southern Appalachian mountain types. U. S. 

 Forest Serv. Appalachian Forest Expt. Sta. Tech. Note 44, 

 13 p. Mar. 20, 1941. 1.9 F7623T 



Similar information in Fire Control Notes 5:101-105. 

 Apr. 1941. 1 F766Fi 



1873. FOBES, C. B. Lightning fires in the forests of 

 northern Maine. J. Forestry 42:291-293. Apr. 1944. 

 99.8 F768 



Data on dollar-value of timber damage, 1926-40. 

 1874. GUTHRIE, J. D. Historic forest fires of 

 America. Amer. Forests 49:290-294, 316-317. June 

 1943. 99.8 F762 



Value of property and timber lost in more recent fires. 



1875. JEMISON, G. M. The effect of basal wounding 

 by forest fires on the diameter growth of some southern 

 Appalachian hardwoods. Duke U. School Forestry B. 9, 

 63 p., illus. July 1944. 99.9 D88 



Includes loss evaluation. 



1876. NEW JERSEY. DEPT. OF CONSERVATION AND 

 DEVELOPMENT. Appraising forest fire damage in New 

 Jersey. U. S. Forest Serv. Allegheny Forest Expt. Sta. 

 Occas. Paper 4, 8 p. Oct. 1, 1941. 1.9 F762220c 



Cooperative study. 



1877. OSBORNE, H. [Method of appraising damage to 

 young growth]. West. Forestry & Conserv. Assoc. Proc. 

 1943:28. 99.9 W522 



1878. POTVIN, A. We pay too high a price. Forest & 

 Outdoors, July 1946, p. 208, illus. 99.8 C16 



Forest fires. 



1879. STICKEL, P. W. Some preliminary tables of 

 forest-fire damage values for the northeastern oak 

 region. U. S. Forest Serv. Northeast. Forest Expt. Sta. 

 Tech. Note 31, 2 p. 1940. 1.9 F7622T 



1880. TAYLOR, L. Lag in forest fire prevention cost- 

 ing Minnesota millions of dollars annually. Miss. Valley 

 Lumberman 76(16):8-9. Apr. 20, 1945. 99.81 M69 



Based on compilation by A. E. Pimley, Minnesota De- 

 partment of Conservation, Division of Forestry. 



Protection from Insects 



1881. BALCH, R. E. On the estimation of forest in- 

 sect damage, with particular reference to Dendroctonus 

 piceaperda Hopk. J. Forestry 40:621-629. Ref. Aug. 

 1942. 99.8 F768 



Comments by S. A. Graham, p. 629. 

 Also in Pulp & Paper Mag. Canada 43:900-906. Nov. 

 1942. 302.8 P96 



1882. BROWN, A. W. A. A note on the gross estimate 

 of forest insect damage in Canada. Forestry Chron. 16: 

 249-254. Dec. 1940. 99.8 F7623 



1883. CRAIGHEAD, F. C. Influence of insects on the 

 development of forest protection and forest management. 

 Smithsn. Inst. Ann. Rpt. (1941):367-392, illus. 1942. 

 Ref. 500 Sm6R 



1884. EVENDEN, J. C, BEDARD, W. D., and 

 STRUBLE, G. R. The mountain pine beetle, an important 

 enemy of western pines. U. S. D. A. C. 664, 25 p., illus. 

 Ref. May. 1943. 1 Ag84C 



A few statistics on physical costs of protection. 



1885. GOBEIL, A. R. Dendroctonus piceaperda Hopk: 

 a detrimental or beneficial insect? J. Forestry 39:632- 

 640. July 1941. 99.8 F768 



Also, with title New Bugs in Gaspe Forest, in Pulp & 

 Paper Mag. Canada 42:730-734, 736. Ref. Nov. 1941. 

 302.8 P96 



1886. GRAHAM, S. T. Some practical aspects of forest 

 entomology. Pulp & Paper Mag. Canada 42:211-213. 

 Feb. 1941. 302.8 P96 



1887. JOHNSON, P. C. Entomological considerations 

 in utilization of insect-killed ponderosa pine. J. Econ. 

 Ent. 33:773-776. Ref. Oct. 1940. 421 J822 



Discusses reasons for low volume of utilization. 



