FOREST MANAGEMENT - -CONTINUED. 



1888. MASSACHUSETTS. DEPT. OF CONSERVATION. 

 DIV. OF FORESTRY. Special report of the Department 

 of Conservation relative to reforestation and the control 

 of the gypsy moth in the Commonwealth. Boston, 1945. 

 34 p. (House P. 1450) 430 M383S 



1889. OREGON. LAWS, STATUTES, ETC. An act to 

 empower the State forester, with the approval of the State 

 Board of Forestry, to declare a district or zone of infes- 

 tation for the eradication of insects injurious to forest 

 growth. Oreg. Laws 1945, Ch. 336:535-537. 



Legal Sect. Libr. 

 Includes cost collection methods. 



1890. PREBBLE, M. L. Forest insects in relation to 

 forestry in British Columbia. Brit. Columbia Lumber- 

 man 28(6):33-34, 48, 50, 52, 54. June 1944. 99.81 B77 



1891. SIMPSON, P. E. The alarming destruction of our 

 western timber resources. Calif. Citrog. 32:330, 342- 

 343. June 1947. 80 C125 



Insects. 



Measures 



1892. AERIAL war on looper. Timberman 46(10):92, 

 94, illus. Aug. 1945. 99.81 T484 



DDT. 



1893. BAIRD, A. B. The spruce sawfly parasite situa- 

 tion, 1940. Pulp & Paper Mag. Canada 42:159-161. Con- 

 vention Issue 1941. 302.8 P96 



Numbers of parasites liberated, no cost data. 



1894. BEHRE, C. E., and REINEKE, L. H. The oppor- 

 tunity for silvicultural control of gypsy moth in south- 

 western Maine. J. Forestry 41:811-815. Nov. 1943. 



99.8 F768 



1895. BODINE, L. V. "Operation flit gun." Amer. 

 Forests 53:440-443, illus. Oct. 1947. 99.8 F762 



Tussock moth control in Idaho. 



1896. BONGBERG, J. W. Experimental cutting for 

 beetle control. Timberman 48(4):128-130, illus. May 

 1947. 99.81 T484 



1897. COLWELL, D. E. Pre-logging pine susceptible 

 to beetle attack. West. Forestry & Conserv. Assoc. 

 Proc. 1944:26-27. 99.9 W522 



1898. DDT SHOWS promising results in beetle control. 

 Timberman 48(2):52, 54, 62, illus. Dec. 1946. 99.81 T484 



1899. EVENDEN, J. C. Progress in forest insect con- 

 trol, with special reference to the tussock moth campaign. 

 West. Forestry & Conserv. Assoc. Proc. 38:40-41. 1947. 



99.9 W522 



1900. GIBSON, A. L. Penetrating sprays to control the 

 mountain pine beetle. J. Econ. Ent. 36:396-398. June 

 1943. 421 J822 



1901. HALL, E. E. Thirty years' experience with bug 

 control. West. Forestry & Conserv. Assoc. Proc. 1944: 

 25-26. 99.9 W522 



1902. HAMILTON, C. C. The pine sawfly Neodiprion 

 sertifer Geoff, and its control with concentrated lead 

 arsenate sprays. J. Econ. Ent. 36:236-240, illus. Apr. 

 1943. Ref. 421 J822 



1903. KEENE, P. {Insect control measures]. West. 

 Forestry & Conserv. Assoc. Proc. 1941:A49-A51. 

 99.9 W522 



Discussion, p. A51-A53. 



1904. MCLINTOCK, T. F. Silvicultural practices for 

 control of spruce budworm. J. Forestry 45:655-658. 

 Ref. Sept. 1947. 99.8 F768 



1905. ORR, T. J. Preliminary results in selective 

 logging control of beetle losses. West. Forestry & 

 Conserv. Assoc. Proc. 1940:99-103. 99.9 W522 



1906. ORR, T. J. Reducing pine beetle damage through 

 partial cutting. West Coast Lumberman 69(4):42, 44, 46, 

 79, illus. Apr. 1942. 99.81 W52 



1907. SALVAGE logging. Timberman 46(6):98, 100, 

 illus. Apr. 1945. 99.81 T484 



Western pine beetle control. 



1908. WESTVELD, M. Forest management as a means 

 of controlling the spruce budworm. J. Forestry 44:949- 

 953. Nov. 1946. 99.8 F768 



Includes damage. 



1909. YUILL, J. S. DDT and airplanes for spraying 

 forests. South. Lumberman 174(2187):46, 48, illus. 

 May 15, 1947. 99.81 So82 



Protection from Disease 



1910. BAXTER, D. V. Pathology in forest practice. 

 N. Y., Wiley, 1943. 618 p., illus. Ref. 464.07 B33P 



Loss, and appraisal of damage, p, 57-83. 



FOREST MANAGEMENT —CONTINUED. 



1911. BILLINGS, R. W. Future forest tree disease 

 control with special reference to blister rust. J. Fores- 

 try 54:586-589. Aug. 1947. 99.8 F768 



1912. CRAIG, G. A. Chemical war waged on blister 

 rust. Timberman 47(12):39, 74, illus. Oct. 1946. 

 99.81 T484 



Costs of control, using 2, 4-D. 



1913. HEPTING, G. H., BUCHANAN, T. S., and 

 JACKSON, L. W. R. Little leaf disease of pine. U. S. D. 

 A. C. 716, 15 p., illus. Apr. 1945. 1 Ag84C 



1914. HUTCHINS, L. M. Disease research and control. 

 Amer. Forest Cong. Proc. (1946)3:348-350. 1947. 



99.9 Am3 



1915. OFFORD, H. R., VAN ATTA, G. R., and 

 SWANSON, H. E. Chemical and mechanical methods of 

 ribes eradication in the white pine areas of the western 

 United States. U. S. D. A. Tech. B. 692, 50 p., illus. Ref. 

 Jan. 1940. 1 Ag84Te 



Costs, p. 43-44. 



1916. TEMPLE, C. E., and YOST, H. E. White pine 

 blister rust control in Maryland. Maryland U. Ext. B. 

 98, 23 p., illus. Ref. June 1943. 275.29 M36B 



Summarizes State eradication work, 1932-41. 



1917. U. S. FOREST SERV. Program, regional leaders 

 conference. Washington, 1946. 52 p. 1.962 A2P944 



U. S. Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine co- 

 operating. 

 White pine blister rust control and Ribes eradication. 



VALUATION 



1918. BRIGHT, E. M. Timber and land appraising, 

 how it's done in Aitken County [Minnesota]. Conserv. 

 Volunteer 8(45):40-42. Mar ./Apr. 1945. 279.8 C765 



1919. CAMPBELL, R. A. Selling prices and produc- 

 tion costs in the Tennessee Valley. J. Forestry 42:647- 

 656, illus. Ref. Sept. 1944. 99.8 F768 



Stumpage appraisal project. 



1920. CHAPMAN, H. H., and MEYER, W. H. Forest 

 valuation, with special emphasis on basic economic 

 principles. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1947. 521 p. Ref. 

 99.57 C36F 



1921. MARTIN, J. D. Probable capital gains from 

 typical forest properties and value of immature loblolly 

 pine stands in the Coastal Plain of North Carolina and 

 Virginia. Durham, N. C, 1947. 37 p. Ref. 



Thesis (M.F.)— Duke University. 



1922. NELSON, A. Z. The concept of "productive 

 capacity" in relation to forest properties. Amer. Soc. 

 Farm Managers & Rural Appraisers J. 6(2): 106- 108. 

 Oct. 1942. 281.8 Am32 



1923. NELSON, A. Z. Forest accounting. J. Forestry 

 39:331-332. Mar. 1941. 99.8 F768 



Possibility of implementing better forestry by means of 

 standardized accounting. 



1924. OSBORNE, W. B. Evaluation of second growth. 

 Pacific Logging Cong. Loggers Handb. (1945) 5:118-119. 



1946. 99.76 P112La 



1925. PINGREE, D. Lower interest trend enhances 

 forest investment. Barron's 27(21):4. May 26, 1947. 

 284.8 B27 



1926. ROBERTSON, W. M. Value growth rate of young 

 pine stands. Canada. Forest Serv. Silvic. Leaflet 1, 2 p. 

 Sept. 1941. 99.9 C16S 



1927. ROE, E. I. What is a pine plantation worth? 

 Amer. Forests 53(l):28-29, 44, illus. Jan. 1947. 

 99.8 F762 



Also in Lake States Timber Digest 1(16): 13- 15. May 8, 



1947. 99.81 L14 



1928. ROTHACHER, J. S. A basis for comparing the 

 value of Southern yellow pines for lumber and poles. 



U. S. Tenn. Val. Authority, Dept. Forestry Relat. Tech. 

 Note 7, 5 p. Oct. 1947. 173.2 T25Tn 



1929. ROTHERY, J. E. Some aspects in the reapprais- 

 al of National Forest stumpage. Washington, U. S. Forest 

 Serv., 1946. 11 p. 1.962 A2So5 



1930. ROTHERY, J. E. Some aspects of appraising 

 standing timber. J. Forestry 43:490-498. July 1945. 

 99.8 F768 



Evaluation of the various approaches used in determin- 

 ing the market values of standing timber for sale on a 

 pay-as-cut basis. 



1931. ROTHERY, J. E. Some interest factors. J. 

 Forestry 39:680-684. Aug. 1941. 99.8 F768 



Estimating future incomes by sinking-fund and 

 compound-interest premises. 



1932. ROWBURY, J. G., JR. Timber "depletion." 

 Accounting Rev.. 22:187-193. Ref. Apr. 1947. 325.8 Ac22 



