MANAGEMENT OF FOREST -PRODUCT HARVESTING 

 AND PROCESSING - -CONTINUED. 



2299. SCHANTZ-HANSEN, T. A preliminary study of 

 several logging methods for aspen. Timber Prod. Assoc. 

 Monthly B. 11(10):7-10. June 1947. 99.9 T482 



Costs and returns. 



2300. SEALE, R. H. Cost analysis of a cedar pole 

 operation on a timber sale of the University of Idaho 

 Experimental Forest. Moscow, 1942. Ref. 



Thesis (M.S.) - University of Idaho. 



2301. SWINGLER, W. S. Good forestry is sound 

 economics. Paper Trade J. 113(5):12, 14. July 31, 1941. 

 302.8 P196 



Pulpwood logging, Armstrong Forest Co. of Pennsyl- 

 vania. 



2302. U. S. GENERAL LAND OFF. OREGON & 

 CALIFORNIA REVESTED LANDS ADMINISTRATION. 



A graphic method of computing estimates of logging costs 

 for the Douglas fir region. West Coast Lumberman 

 69(4):36-39, illus. Apr. 1942. 99.81 W52 



2303. WACKERMAN, A. E. Why not budget logging 

 costs? South. Lumberman 165(2071):49-51, illus. July 

 15, 1942. 99.81 So82 



2304. WALTERS, C. S. Fiberwood production in 

 [north-central] Illinois. J. Forestry 43:406-407. June 

 1945. 99.8 F768 



Mixed cordwood for use in the manufacture of roofing 

 felt. 



2305. WILSON, H. M. Mechanical woods operation 

 for log lengths. Pulp & Paper Mag. Canada 43:30-31, 29, 

 illus. Jan. 1942. 302.8 P96 



2306. WILSON, H. M. Time and money factors in 

 mechanical woods operations. Canada Lumberman 

 62(20):15-16. Oct. 15, 1942. 99.81 C16 



2307. *YOST, W. P.. Obtaining lower costs in pulpwood 

 production. Ann Arbor, 1943. 



Thesis (M.F.) - University of Michigan. 



Waste and Relogging 



2308. BARNES, G. H. Cubic foot scaling and utiliza- 

 tion of logging waste. Timberman 46(6):66, 68, 70, 72, 

 illus. Ref. Apr. 1945. 99.81 T484 



2309. CROSBY, W. E. Vast storm damage salvage 

 project launched [East Texas]. West Coast Lumberman 

 71(8):58, 60, illus. Aug. 194*. 99.81 W52 



2310. FILBERG, R. J. How far can the logger go in 

 removing more merchantable material from the land. 

 West. Forestry & Conserv. Assoc. Proc. 1944:23-24. 

 99.9 W522 



Slash logging. 



2311. FISHER, D. D. Salvage logging and fire protec- 

 tion in the Tillamook burn. Greg. State Col. School 

 Forestry. Forestry Club Ann. Cruise 24:34-35, 70, illus. 

 1943. 99.9 Or34 



Operations of the Consolidated Timber Co., Glenwood, 

 Or eg. 



2312. FOLEY, H. S. Salvage of logging waste. Pulp & 

 Paper Mag. Canada 46(6):479, 481. May 1945. 302.8 P96 



British Columbia. 



2313. GRANTHAM, J. B. New standards of forest 

 utilization for the Douglas-fir region. J. Forestry 44:370- 

 375. Ref. Nov. 1946. 99.8 F768 



2314. GRANTHAM, J. B. Progress toward improved 

 use of timber wastes. Oreg. Business Rev. 5(10):l-5. 

 Oct. 1946. 280.8 Or34 



Includes salvage logging operations. 



2315. GRANTHAM, J. B. Recovery of forest waste. 

 Timberman 46(8):56-58, 80, illus.; (10):43-44, 46-47, 58, 

 illus. Ref. June, Aug. 1945. 99.81 T484 



2316. GRANTHAM, J. B. Relogging problems in the 

 Douglas fir region. Wash. U. Forest Club. Q. 20(1):5-12, 

 illus. Ref. Autumn 1946. 99.9 W275Q 



Utilization of logging waste. 



2317. GRANTHAM, J. B. Salvage operations in the 

 Douglas-fir region: their present and future. Oreg. State 

 Col. Oreg. Forest Prod. Lab. Inform. C. 1, 23 p., illus. 

 1947. 99.9 Or3522I 



Similar information with title Western Relogging in 

 Wood [Chicago 2(3):12-14, 37-38; (4):28-30; (5):26-28, 

 32, 35, illus. Mar. -May 1947. 99.82 W859 



2318. GRONDAL, B. L. Logging waste and its potential 

 value in pulp manufacture. Brit. Columbia Lumberman 

 27(5):42, 44. May 1943. 99.81 B77 



2319. GRONDAL, B. L. Why is waste wood wasted? 

 Pacific Pulp & Paper Indus. 17(10):29-31. Oct. 1943. 

 302.8 Pll 



MANAGEMENT OF FOREST-PRODUCT HARVEST ING 

 AND PROCESSING —CONTINUED. 



Also, under title Why Woods Waste? in West Coast 

 Lumberman 70(12):89, 93. Dec. 1943. 99.81 W52 



2320. MACBEAN, A. P. The Ladysmith experiment in 

 salvaging pulpwood from logging waste, 1943-1944. 

 Forestry Chron. 21:240-253, illus. Dec. 1945. 99.8 F7623 



Cooperative project of the Comox Logging and Railway 

 Co., the Powell River Co., and the British Columbia 

 Forest Service, for the economic utilization of logging 

 waste. 



2321. MACBEAN, A. P. Some observations on the 

 pulpwood salvaging experiment at Ladysmith. Pacific 

 Pulp & Paper Indus. 18(2):39-40. Feb. 1944. 302.8 Pll 



Salvaging logging waste by Powell River Co. at Lady- 

 smith, British Columbia. 



2322. MATSON, E. E., and GRANTHAM, J. B. Salvage 

 logging in the Douglas-fir region of Oregon and Washing- 

 ton. Oreg. State Col. Oreg. Forest Prod. Lab. B. 1, 40 

 p., illus. Ref. Aug. 1947. .99.9 Or3522B 



2323. MINOR, C. O. Logging waste resulting from 

 poor felling and bucking practices in the Piedmont 

 Region of North Carolina. Durham, N. C, 1942. 31 p., 

 illus. Ref. 



Thesis (M.F.)— Duke University. 



2324. ORCHARD, C. D. Salvage logging experiments in 

 British Columbia. Timberman 14(3):132-133. Jan. 1944. 

 99.81 T484 



Further discussion in Feb. issue, p. 68, 70-72, illus. 



2325. POWELL River [Company] studies need for 

 whole log barker-clipper; economic success of log 

 salvaging experiment at Ladysmith, on Vancouver Island, 

 is assured. Pacific Pulp & Paper Indus. 17(8):24-25, 

 illus. Aug. 1943. 302.8 Pll 



Further developments in converting logging waste into 

 pulp by Powell River Co. and Comox Logging and Railway 

 Co. 



2326. POWELL River's utilization of wood debris. 

 Pacific Pulp & Paper Indus. 17(6):6-12, illus. June 1943. 

 302.8 Pll 



Similar information under title Greater Recovery of 

 Forest Debris, in West Coast Lumberman 70(6): 14- 15, 

 44, 46. June 1943. 99.81 W52 



2327. PRIAULX, A. W. Lumber from logging, left- 

 overs. Amer. Forests 53:214-215, 240, illus. May 1947. 

 99.8 F762 



2328. RELOGGING yields second forest harvest. Tim- 

 berman 47(6):100-102, 104, 106, illus. Apr. 1946. 



99.81 T484 



2329. RICHEN, C. W. Some problems in relogging cut- 

 over lands. Pulp & Paper Indus. 20(2):58, 60. Feb. 1946. 

 302.8 Pll 



2330. SORENSEN, C. J. Why are small pulpwood logs 

 left to rot in the woods? Timberman 45(6):38-39, illus. 

 Apr. 1944. 99.81 T484 



2331. WHITFIELD, N. C. Re-logging. Timberman 

 47(12):50, 52, 54, illus. Oct. 1946. 99.81 T484 



Felling, Bucking and Peeling 



2332. ARTMAN, J. O. Log production by chain and 

 crosscut saws. Pulp & Paper Mag. Canada 47(8): 107, 

 illus. July 1946. 302.8 P96 



Man-hours and cost in felling, bucking, and limbing oak 

 and hickory, U. S. Tennessee Valley Authority, Depart- 

 ment of Forestry Relations. 



2333. BOW SAW saves time and money. South. Lum- 

 berman 165(2075):55. Sept. 15, 1942. 99.81 So82 



2334. CHALLENGER, J. W. . Five years of power saw- 

 ing. Timberman 44(1):10-13, illus. Nov. 1942. 



99.81 T484 



British Columbia. 



Time study of power bucking, p. 13. 



Also in Canada Lumberman 63(6):9-12, illus. Mar. 15, 

 1943. 99.81 C16 



2335. CHALLENGER, J. W. Going all out for mechani- 

 cal falling. Timberman 45(8):76-78, illus. June 1944. 

 99.81 T484 



Time comparison of two kinds of power saw. 



2336. CHALLENGER, J. W. Power saws; an analysis of 

 four years' operation. Timberman 41(12):53-54, 58, illus. 

 Oct. 1940. 99.81 T484 



Similar information in Canada Lumberman 60(22): 23- 24. 

 Nov.. 15, 1940. 99.81 C16 



2337. CHALLENGER, J. W. Power saws-past, present 

 and future. Timber Canada 6(6):88-90, illus. Feb. 1946. 

 99.81 T487 



Efficiency of power saw operations versus manual 

 operations in felling and bucking of timber. 



*Not examined. 



