MANAGEMENT OF FOREST - PRODUCT HARVESTING 

 AND PROCESSING - -CONTINUED. 



1, Cost analysis, 17 p.; 2, Time studies, 19 p.; 3, Lum- 

 ber value yields, 45 p.; 4, Costs and returns^ 51 p. 



Information from Bent Creek Experimental Forest near 

 Asheville, N. C, 1945-46. 



2569. JENSEN, V. S., BEHRE, C. E., and BENSON, 

 A. O. Cost of producing white pine lumber in New Eng- 

 land. U. S. D. A. C. 557, 40 p., illus. July 1940. 



1 Ag84C 



Results of a study of six typical log-lumber operations 

 conducted by the U. S. Forest Service, Northeastern 

 Forest Experiment Station and Forest Products Labora- 

 tory. Costs and returns of log and lumber production in 

 relation to methods of harvest. 



2570. KIRKLAND, B. P. Productivity of logging and 

 sawmill labor as affected by tree size. J. Forestry 41- 

 869-872. Dec. 1943. 99.8 F768 



2571. KREBS, O. M. Cutting it thin, or cutting it thick? 

 South. Lumberman 169(2129): 269- 270. Dec. 15, 1944. 

 99.81 So82 



Possible profits from sawing lumber to thicknesses less 

 than 1 in. 



2572. LODEWICK, J. E. Douglas fir log values, 1-3. 

 Timberman 43(11):18, 20, 24; (12):18-20; 44(1):26, 28, 30, 

 32, illus. Sept.-Nov. 1942. 99.81 T484 



West Coast Lumbermen's Association, Pacific Log 

 Scaling and Grading Bureau, Northwest Loggers' Associ- 

 ation, O&C Grant Lands Administration, and U. S. Forest 

 Service Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment 

 Station cooperating. 



2573. LODEWICK, J. E. West Coast log values. U. S. 

 Forest Serv. Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Expt. 

 Sta. Prod. Papers 3-4, 2 v. Dec. 1, 1941, Jan. 1, 1943. 

 1.9622 P2P942 



1, Douglas-fir from the Oregon Cascades; 2, Western 

 hemlock from the Washington Cascades. 

 Milling costs and value recovery. 



2574. MORE comments on increased logging and 

 manufacturing costs; many factors make for mounting 

 costs and reduced output. Canada Lumberman 63(12): 

 17-18. June 15, 1943. 99.81 C16 



2575. PERSON, H. L. East Texas mill study shows 

 Jow returns from small logs. Forest Farmer 6(4):7-8. 

 Jan. 1947. 99.8 F7692 



Project of U. S. Forest Service, Southern Forest Ex- 

 periment Station. 



2576. PRINCE, J. B.. and FELLOWS, E. S. Cost of 

 sawing eastern spruce lumber. Ottawa, Canada Forest 

 Serv., Forest Products Laboratory, 1943. 4 p. 



99.76 C1632C 



Similar material in Canada Lumberman 63(23 ):22- 24. 

 Dec. 1, 1943. 99.81 C16; and in Barrell and Box and 

 Packages 48(12):5-6. Dec. 1943. 99.82 B27 



2577. RAUPACH, C. V. Time study in mill planning. 

 Timberman 48(4):64, illus. Feb. 1947. 99.81 T484' 



Sawing time for various sizes of logs at a pine mill in 

 southern Oregon. 



2578. RITTLER, E. S. A case problem in lumber 

 costs. Natl. Assoc. Cost Accountants B. 23:599-613. 

 Jan. 1, 1942. Libr. Cong. 



Costs of logging and manufacture, and returns from 

 sales, Texla Lumber Company. 



2579. SCHUMACHER F. X., and JONES, W. C, JR. 

 Empirical log rules and the allocation of sawing time to 

 log size. J. Forestry 38:889-896. Nov. 1940. 99.8 F768 



2580. TELFORD, C. J., and MALCOLM, F. B. Milling 

 of aspen into lumber. U. S. Forest Serv. Lake States 

 Forest Expt. Sta. Aspen Rpt. 4, 9 p. Oct. 1947. 



1.9622 L2L14 



2581. TELFORD, C. J. Short-cut method of finding 

 the minimum sized tree that pays its way through small 

 sawmill operations. U. S. Forest Serv. Forest Prod. 

 Lab. R899-13, 6 p. 1940? (Small Sawmill Improvement, 

 Practical Pointers to Field Agencies) 1.9 F761R 



2582. U. S. FOREST SERV. FOREST PRODUCTS 

 LABORATORY. Small sawmill accounting. U. S. Forest 

 Serv. Forest Prod. Lab. R899-12, 8 p. 1940? (Small 

 Sawmill Improvement, Practical Pointers to Field Agen- 

 cies.) 1.9 F761R 



2583. WHAT'S the increase in logging and manufactur- 

 ing costs? Canada Lumberman 63(9):35-36. May 1, 

 1943. 99.81 C16 



Scaling, Grading and Recovery 



2584. BELYEA, H. C. Cheating woodlot owners with 

 the Doyle log rule. Rural New-Yorker 105:235. Mar. 16, 

 1946. 6 R88 



MANAGEMENT OF FOREST-PRODUCT HARVESTING 

 AND PROCESSING —CONTINUED. 



2585. BENSON, A. O. Grading hardwood logs by the 

 cutting system. South. Lumberman 163(2057): 226-228, 

 illus. Dec. 15, 1941. 99.81 So82 



2586. BENSON, A. O. A new approach to hardwood log 

 grades. South. Lumberman 161(2022): 27-28. July 1, 

 1940. 99.81 So82 



2587. BENSON, A. O. Something new in hardwood log 

 grades. J. Forestry 39:13-15. Jan. 1941. 99.8 F768 



Also in U. S. Forest Serv. Forest Prod. Lab. R1271, 

 4 p. Jan. 1941. 1.9 F761R 



2588. BLYTHE, R. H. Saving by sampling [in log 

 scaling]. Timberman 46(5):42-45, 80, illus. Mar. 1945. 

 99.8 T484 



2589. BOISFONTAINE, A. S. Facts and figures regard- 

 ing operation of SPIB [Southern Pine Inspection Bureau]. 

 South. Lumber J. 48(8):34-35, 51. Aug. 1944. 99.81 So8 



2590. BOISFONTAINE, A. S. Standards-a four-lane 

 highway to lumber markets. South. Lumberman 161 

 (2033):141-143. Dec. 15, 1940. 99.81 So82 



Value of Southern Pine Inspection Bureau. 



2591. BRANDES, R. A. A log grade analysis of pon- 

 derosa pine. Wash. U. Abs. of Theses (1941-42) 7:97-100. 



1943. 241.8 W27 



Cutting policies based on analysis of tree and log values 

 traced from product value back through the mill and to 

 the stump. 



2592. BRATTON, A. W. Hardwoods-the bigger the 

 better; hemlocks— just get bigger. U. S. Forest Serv. 

 Northeast. Forest Expt. Sta. Forest Econ. Note 2, 3 p. 

 1946. 1.9622 N2F764 



Larger hemlocks tend to yield less sound lumber. 

 Similar information in Canada Lumberman 67(7):47-48, 

 illus. Apr. 1, 1947. 99.81 C16 



2593. BRIEGLEB, P. A. Sample scaling for West 

 Coast logs. Timberman 45(4):98, 100-102, illus. Feb. 



1944. 99.81 T484 



2594. BROMLEY, W. S. The use of log grades in 

 appraising lumber values of selectively cut northern hard- 

 wood timber. Mich. Acad. Sci., Arts, and Letters Papers 

 (1940)26:135-142. Mar. 1941. 500 M582 



2595. DAVIS, E. M. Lumber from old-growth versus 

 lumber from second-growth in Pinus strobus. J. Fores- 

 try 38:877-880. Nov. 1940. 99.8 F768 



Compares lumber grades, size classes, and quality. 



2596. FELLOWS, E. S. Eastern spruce grading past 

 and present. Canada Lumberman 65(9):73, 105. May 1, 



1945. 99.81 C16 



2597. FELLOWS, E. S. Spruce grading in the Maritime 

 Provinces; analysis of need for uniform practice— outline 

 of benefits which may result. Canada Lumberman 63(17): 

 69-70. Sept. 1, 1943. 99.81 C16 



2598. FENSOM, K. G. Development of standard spruce 



frading rules. Canada Lumberman 61(23):9-11; (24)- 21- 

 3. Dec. 1-15, 1941. 99.81 C16 

 For eastern Canada. 



2599. HERRICK, A. M. Grade yields and overrun from 

 Indiana hardwood sawlogs. Ind. Agr. Expt. Sta. B. 516, 

 59 p., illus. 1946. 100 In2P 



U. S. Forest Service, Central States Forest Experiment 

 Station cooperating. 



2600. JOHNSON, H. M. Recovery of aircraft lumber 

 from noble fir logs. Timberman 45(2):38, 40, 42, illus. 

 Dec. 1943. 99.81 T484 



2601. KELLOGG, L. F., and KUENZEL, J. G. Lumber 

 grade recovery from shortleaf pine and mixed oak in 

 northern Arkansas. J. Forestry 43:10-15. Jan. 1945. 

 99.8 F768 



2602. LEAHY, W. E. Log scaling in the Columbia 

 River district. West Coast Lumberman 69(1):64. Jan. 

 1942. 99.81 W52 



Economic advantages of services provided by Columbia 

 River Log Scaling and Grading Bureau. 



2603. LEXEN, B. The application of sampling to log 

 scaling. J. Forestry 39:624-631. July 1941. 99.8 F768 



Also in Pulp & Paper Mag. Canada 42:672, 674-678. 

 Oct. 1941. 302.8 P96 



Comments by P. Neff, J. Forestry 40:54-56. Jan. 1942. 



Application to Canadian conditions given by I. F. Fogh, 

 Sampling Methods in Log Scaling, in Forestry Chron. 

 19:127-138, illus. June 1943. 99.8 F7623 



2604. LISCHER, W. J. A study of tree value as indi- 

 cated by external characteristics of eastern white pine. 

 Syracuse, 1940. 1 p. 241.8 N48 



Abstract of thesis (M.F.)-New York State College of 

 Forestry. 

 External grading correlated with mill study. 



