THE FOREST ECONOMY AT LARGE--CONTINUED. 
301. RAUSHENBUSH, S. Our conservation job. Pub. 
Aff. Inst. Rpt. 4,64 p. Ref. 1949. 279.12 R19 
Analytical review by J. F. Timmons in J. Farm Econ. 
32:148-150. Feb.1950. 280.8 J822 
302. SPARHAWK, W.N. The history of forestry in 
America. Trees, U.S.D.A. Ybk, 1949:702-714. 1 Ag84Y 
303. SWEENEY, F. The changing forest situation; a 
study of conservation on State and private forest lands. 
New York,Amer. Enterprise Assoc.,1950. 52 p. Ref. 
(National Economic Problems Series 435) 99.61 Sw3 
Contents: The evolution of the forest resource; The 
basic facts; Fire and organized protection; The changing 
character of conservation; State forestry legislation; 
Difficulties of statistical projection. 
304. SWIFT, E. F. A plea for unity, understanding, 
and action [in conservation]. Madison, Wis. Conserv. 
Dept.,1949. 7p. 279.097 Sw5 
Address to the Wisconsin Conservation Council. 
305. U. S. FOREST SERV. Highlights in the history 
of forest conservation. U.S. D. A. Agr. Inform. B. 83, 
23 p. Aug.1952. 1 Ag84Ab 
306. U. S. NEW ENGLAND-NEW YORK INTER- 
AGENCY COMMITTEE. Report of testimony and state- 
ments presented [at various public hearings.] New York, 
1951-52. Tv. 173 N44R29 
307. U. S. PRESIDENT'S MATERIALS POLICY COM- 
MISSION. Resources for freedom. Washington,1952. 
bv. 17353°P92 
V. 1, Foundations for growth and security, includes Ch. 
8, Making the most of timber resources. This chapter, in 
addition to its statistical information, makes recommen- 
dations for Federal forest policy; v. 4, The promise of 
technology, includes Ch. 10, The technology of forest 
products; v. 5, Selected reports to the Commission, in- 
cludes two U. S. Forest Service reports entitled Domestic 
timber resources, and The free world's forest resources. 
308. VAUX, H. J. Economic measures of forest con- 
servation. Bioi. Colloquium 13:19-24. 1952. 442.9 B524 
The balance of growth and drain in the light of United 
States history; obstacles to timber conservation. 
309. VAUX, H. J. Some economic goals in forest 
policy. J. Forestry 47:612-617. Ref. Aug.1949. 
99.8 F768 
Federal 
310. BAILEY, F. O. A closer look at Agriculture's 
reorganization. Amer. Forests 57(7):18-19,30. July195L 
99.8 F762 
Viewpoint U. S. Soil Conservation Service presented by 
J. F. Preston, Amer. Forests 57(8):23,35,40. Aug.1951. 
311. BASER, N. The Hoover report on Interior. 
Amer. Forests 55(5):28,46. May 1949. 99.8 F762 
312. COLLINGWOOD, G. H. Conservation and the 
Hoover report. Amer. Forests 55(4):12-13,45-46. Apr. 
1949. 99.8 F762 
313. CRAFTS, E. C. Public forest policy ina 
national emergency. J. Forestry 50:266-270. Apr.1952. 
99.8 F768 
314. GRANGER, C. M. The National forests, the 
people's property. Trees, U.S.D.A. Ybk. 1949:299-304. 
1 Ag84y 
315. GROVER, F. W. Other Federal forests. 
U.S.D.A. Ybk. 1949:381-390. 1 Ag84Y 
Forests in custody of or administered by the U. S. 
Bureau of Land Management, including the Oregon & 
California Revested Lands; U. S. Bureau of Indian Affairs; 
U.S. National Park Service; U. S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service; U. S. Department of Defense; U. S. Soil Conser- 
vation Service; and the U. S. Tennessee Valley Authority. 
316. HUTCHISON, S. B. A yardstick for judging 
public forestry projects. J. Forestry 49:99-101. Feb. 
1951. 19.8 F768 
Comments by H. J. Vaux, p. 101-103. 
317. KINNEY, J. P. Indian forest and range; a 
history of the administration and conservation of the red- 
man's heritage. Washington, Forestry Enterp.,1950. 
357 p. Ref. 99.61 K62 
U. S. Bureau of Indian Affairs. 
318. KELLER, J. W. Forestry and soil conservation. 
J. Forestry 46:340-343. May 1948. 99.8 F768 
Forestry of U. S. Soil Conservation Service. 
319. LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS, Big govern- 
Trees, 
ment and conservation. Washington,1951. 31 p. (Publi- 
cation 182) 279.12 L47 
320. LEMIEUX, F. Our nationalized forests. New 
Orleans,1952. 16 p. 99.71 L54 
10 
THE FOREST ECONOMY AT LARGE--CONTINUED. 
321. LOVERIDGE, E. W. Administration of forests: 
organization of forest services. United Nations Sci. Conf. 
Conserv. & Util. Resources. Proc. 5:203-207. 1949,pub. 
i951. 279.9 Un32P 
The U. S. Forest Service administrative ideals. 
322. LOVERIDGE, E. W. The administration of 
National forests. Trees, U.S.D.A. Ybk. 1949:372-380. 
1 Ag84y 
Administration aimed to serve the national and local 
economy. 
323. MCARDLE, R. E. The role of government in 
forest conservation and management. Soc. Amer. For- 
esters. North. Calif. Sect. Papers 1949:18-23. 1950. 
99.9 Sol3Pa 
324. MCARDLE, R. E. What is past is prologue. 
Washington, U. S. Forest Serv.,1950. 11 p. 1.962 A2M12 
Address before joint American Forestry Association- 
Canadian Forestry Association meeting, October 9, 1950. 
Reviews progress in forest policy and research. 
325. MAHONEY, J. R. Natural resources activity of 
the Federal government; historical, descriptive, analyti- 
cal. U.S. Libr. Cong. Leg. Ref. Serv. Pub. Affairs B. 76, 
249 p. Jan.1950. 280.9 Un31 
326. MARSH, R. E. Essential features of forest 
policy and law. United Nations Sci. Conf. Conserv. & 
Util. Resources. Proc. 5:184-187. Ref. 1949,pub.1951. 
279.9 Un32P 
Chiefly U. S. public policy. Federal policy features are: 
Public ownership and management; Leadership in forest 
research; Cooperative assistance to State and private 
owners; Association with agricultural policy; Encourage- 
ment of strong State services; Needs in taxation and 
credit. 
327. MILLER, L. A. The case for a Department of 
Natural Resources. Amer. Forests 55(11):24-25, 46-47. 
Nov.1949. 99.8 F762 
Supporting recommendations of the Hoover Commission 
report. 
328. MOORE, R. Free aid and forestry. Pa. Forests 
37:89-91. Oct./Dec.1952. 99.8 F763 
Discusses inadequacies of Federal cooperative aid 
programs. 
329. ORDWAY, S. H. An approach to organization 
within government to advance the conservation of natural 
resources. New York,Conserv. Found.,1950. 15 p. 
279.12 Or2 
Proposed organization of a Department of Natural Re- 
sources, broader in scope than the minority plan from 
the Hoover Commission. 
330. TINKER, E. W. Government policies and our 
forest lands (Quo vadis). South. Pulp & Paper Mfr. 12(8): 
43,45,50. Aug.15,1949. 302.8 So8 
Also in Paper Mill News 72(32):16. Aug.6,1949. 
302.8 P195; Paper Trade J. 129(5):12-14. Aug.4,1949. 
302.8 P196 
331. U. S. BUR. OF THE BUDGET. Study of Federal 
land management activities. Washington,1950. 3 p. 
1.962 A2St9 
Suggests procedures for further study, as a result of 
conflicting recommendations from the U. S. Commission 
on Organization of the Executive Branches of the Govern- 
ment (Hoover Commission). 
332. U. S. COMMISSION ON ORGANIZATION OF THE 
EXECUTIVE BR. OF THE GOVERNMENT. The Hoover 
Commission report. New York,McGraw-Hill,1949. 524 p 
249.3 Un392 
Also issued in a 19 volume series, each volume bearing 
title of Federal department or function discussed, e.g. 
Dept. of the Interior; Dept. of Agriculture. 173 Or3R; this 
series includes Appendix L, Task force report on natural 
resources, and Appendix M, Task force report on agricul- 
ture activities, which discuss in detail some conflicting 
organizational matters and policies affecting forests and 
other natural resources. 
333. U.S. CONGRESS.SENATE. COMMITTEE ON IN- 
TERIOR AND INSULAR AFFAIRS, National resources 
policy. Hearings ... 81st Cong., Ist sess., January 31- 
February 7, 1949. Washington,1949. 470 p. 279.12 Un32 
Includes testimony of O. L. Chapman and J. F. Shanklin 
regarding administration of forestry in the U. S. Depart- 
ment of the Interior. 
334. U. S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE. Missouri 
River Basin agricultural program. Rev. ed. Washington, 
1949. 188 p. 1.90 A2M69 
A program for forest and forest range lands, p.69-79. 
