LAND MANAGEMENT--CONTINUED. 
817. TAYLOR, J. [Washington State-owned public 
lands]. Wash. State Forestry Conf. Annu. Mtg. 29:28-29. 
1950. 99.9 W276 
818. U. S. FOREST SERV. CALIFORNIA FOREST 
AND RANGE EXPERIMENT STATION. Area and owner- 
ship of forest land in [various counties], California. U.S. 
Forest Serv. Calif. Forest & Range Expt. Sta. Forest 
Survey Releases 5,8-11, 5 v. June 1,1948-Feb.1952. 
1.9 F7626F 
U. S. Bureau of Agricultural Economics, cooperating. 
No. 5, Forest land ownership in northern Mendocino 
County, by A. Poli and D. T. Griffith. June 1, 1948. 49 p.; 
No. 8, Area and ownership of forest land in Siskiyou 
County, by G. F. Burks and A. Poli. Dec.1950. 23 p.; 
No. 9, Trinity County, by H. L. Baker and A. Poli. Apr. 
1951. 23 p.; No. 10, Mendocino County, same authors. 
Oct.1951. 23 p.; No. 11, Lake County, same authors. 
Feb.1952. 22 p.; No. 14, Sonoma County, same authors. 
Sept.1952. 23 p.; No. 16, Humboldt County. Nov.1952. 
23 p. 
E 819. WOHLETZ, L. R., and DOLDER, E. F. Know 
California's land; a land-capability guide for soil and 
water conservation in California. Sacramento, Calif. 
Dept. Nat. Resources,1952. 43 p. 282.010 C125 
U. S. Soil Conservation Service, cooperating. 
Canada 
820. BRITISH COLUMBIA LOWER MAINLAND 
REGIONAL PLANNING BOARD. Chaos—or regional 
planning. Brit. Columbia Lumberman 36(4):76-80, 84. 
Apr.1952. 99.81 B77 
821. FREEMAN, T. H., THOMPSON, W. E., and 
CHAPPELL, C. H. The Saskatchewan system of rural 
land assessment. Ed. 2. Regina,Saskatchewan Min. 
Munic. Aff.,1950. 277 p. 284.5 F872 
Cost of clearing bush and the evaluation of bush-covered 
land, p. 203-205. 
822. HUDSON, S. C., and others. Types of farming 
in Canada. Canada Dept. Agr. P. 825,83 p. Dec.1949. 
(Farmers Bulletin 157) 7 C16F 
R. A. Studd, W. Van Vliet, and J. L. Forsyth, joint 
authors. 
Includes map and discussion of farms deriving at least 
50 percent revenue from forest products. 
ZONING 
823. HARKNESS, W. J. K. Zoning needs for wilder- 
ness areas [of Ontario]. Sylva 8(4):2-8. July/Aug.1952. 
99.8 Sy5 
824. HOPKINS, A. S. Some thoughts on zoning the 
ey York State] Forest Preserve. N. Y. State Conserv. 
(6):6-8. June/July 1952. 279.8 N48 
825. ROWLANDS, W. A. The contribution of rural 
zoning. Wis. Conserv. B. 13(6):25-30. June 1948. 
279.8 W752 
826. ROWLANDS, W., TRENK, F., and PENN, R. 
Rural zoning in Wisconsin. Wis. Agr. Expt. Sta. B. 479, 
32 p. Nov.1948. 100 W75 
827. SOLBERG, E. D. Rural zoning in the United 
States. U.S.D.A. Agr. Inform. B. 59,85 p. Jan.1952. 
1 Ag84Ab 
U. S. Bureau of Agricultural Economics, cooperating. 
Zoning for forestry and recreation, p. 33-36; appendix 
analyzes enabling legislation in the various States. 
; 828. *STOLTENBERG, C. Progress in rural zoning 
in northern Minnesota. St. Paul,1951. 248 p. 
Thesis (Ph.D.) - University of Minnesota. 
TENURE 
829. BARRACLOUGH, S. L. Forest land ownership 
in New England, with special reference to forest holdings 
of less than five thousand acres. Cambridge,1949. 269 p. 
Ref. 99.61 B272 
Thesis (Ph.D.) - Harvard University. 
Condensed with title, Who owns forest land in New 
England? in Fed. Reserve Bank Boston Mon. Rev. 31(8): 
5-7. Aug.1949. 284.8 F31B ; 
Contents: Forest land in New England's economy; The 
physical and historical background; Scope and methods of 
this study; Publicly-owned forest lands in New England; 
The large forest holdings; The farm ownerships of forest 
land; Previous studies of small forest holdings in New 
*Not examined. 
24 
LAND MANAGEMENT--CONTINUED. 
England; Findings of the present survey: The small forest 
holdings and their owners; How and when the small hold- 
ings were acquired; The costs and returns to the owners 
of small forest holdings; Tne motives of forest owner- 
ship; Summary and conclusions. 
830. BARRACLOUGH, S. A key to forestry in New 
Hampshire, the predominance of small forest ownership. 
Forest Notes 16:3-6. Aug.1952. 99.8 F7691 
831. BARRACLOUGH, S., and RETTIE, J. C. The : 
ownership of small private forest-land holdings in 23 New 
England towns. U.S. Forest Serv. Noeast. Forest Expt. 
Sta. Sta. Paper 34,32 p. Mar.1950. 1.9622 N2St22 
832. BESLEY, L. Viewpoints on forest tenure cea 
British Columbia | Pulp & Paper Mag. Canada 53(3):312- 
313,316, 318, 321-322. Conv. Issue 1952. 302.8 P96 
833. FOREST land tenure tn British Columbia]. 
Brit. Columbia Lumberman 34(5):42,48. May 1950. 
99.81 B77 
834. GILMOUR, J. D. Canada's forests should be 
under private ownership. Pulp & Paper Mag. Canada 51 
(10):153-154,156,158. Sept.1950. 302.8 P96 
835. GILMOUR, J. D. Forest ownership and taxa- 
tion. Forestry Chron. 26:206-212. Sept.1950. 
99.8 F7623 
836. HASEL, A. A., and POLI, A. A new approach 
to forest ownership surveys. Land Econ. 25:1-10. Feb. 
1949. 282.8 J82 
Ownership patterns and sampling methods in a survey 
conducted by the U. S. Forest Service California Forest 
& Range Experiment Station and U. S. Bureau of Agricul- 
tural Economics as a part of the nation-wide Forest Sur- 
vey. 
837. HAWES, A. F. Long term ownership of forests 
desirable. Conn. Woodlands 15:10-11. Mar.1950. 
99.8 C76 
838. KAGIS, I. Forestry ownership and forestry 
practice. Forestry Chron. 26:213-220. Sept.1950. 
99.8 F7623 
Bases many opinions of the Canadian situation on Euro- 
pean experience. 
839. MOTTISHAW, J.S. Forest land tenure in 
British Columbia. West. Forestry & Conserv. Assoc. 
Proc. 40:37-38. 1949. 99.9 W522 
840. NELSON, R. D. County and municipal forest 
land ownership in the Tennessee Valley. Norris,U. S. 
Tenn. Val. Authority Div. Forestry Relat.,1948. 7 p. 
173.2 T25Cot 
841. NELSON, R. D. Public forest land ownership in 
the Tennessee Valley counties. Norris,U. S. Tenn. Val. 
Authority Div. Forestry Relat.,1949. 12 p. 173.2 T25Pub 
842. NUMBER of private owners of commercial 
forest land in the United States and the average size of 
holding by size of ownership, by region, 1945. Trees, 
U.S.D.A. Ybk. 1949:210. 1 Ag84Y 
843. POLI, A. Conducting a survey of ownership of 
forest land in California. Agr. Econ. Res. 4(1):8-12. 
Jan.1952. 1 Ec7Agr 
A cooperative operation in the Forest Survey, U. S. 
Bureau of Agricultural Economics and U. S. Forest 
Service California Forest and Range Experiment Station, 
cooperating. 
844. U.S. FOREST SERV. Ownership of saw timber 
on commercial forest land of the United States by region. 
Trees, U.S.D.A. Ybk. 1949:654. 1 Ag84Y 
845. U.S. FOREST SERV. Possessory Indian claims 
in southeast Alaska. Washington,1949. 5 p. 
1.962 A2P844 
846. WHITE, H. G. Forest ownership research in 
historical perspective. J. Forestry 48:261-264. Ref. 
Apr.1950. 99.8 F768 
847. WILSON, S. A., and MALONE, P. E. Instability 
of forest land ownership in western Oregon and Washing- 
ton, 1932-41. U.S. Forest Serv. Pacific Nowest. Forest 
& Range Expt. Sta. Res. Paper 1,57 p. June 1948. 
1.9622 P2R31 
Contents: Status of forest land ownership as reflected 
by delinquency and reversion; Factors bearing on the un- 
stable ownership condition existing during the period 
1932-41; Developments since 1941 and their probable 
effects on the stability of forest land ownership in the 
future; Lines of action proposed. 
ACQUISITION AND SALE 
848. DAMON, H. F. The acquisition and management 
of small timberland holdings in New England. New Haven, 
1949. 70 p. Ref. 
Thesis (M.F.) - Yale University. 
