FOREST MANAGEMENT--CONTINUED. 
886. HODGINS, H. J. Forest management in British 
Columbia. Brit. Columbia Lumberman 35(6):48,130,134. 
June 1951. 99.81 B77 
887. JAMES, L. M. Determining forest landowner- 
ship and its relation to timber management. J. Forestry 
48:257-260. Apr.i950. 99.8 F768 
888. JAMES, L. M., and HOFFMAN, W. P. Misssis- 
sippi timber stands before and after cutting. U.S. Forest 
Serv. South. Forest Expt. Sta. Forest Survey Release 60, 
19 p. June 1949. 1.9 F76240 
Drain related to cutting and utilization; effects on grow- 
ing stock. 
889. KENNEDY, H. Forest management in Ontario. 
Forestry Chron. 28(4):71-78. Dec.1952. 99.8 F7623 
Public and private management, especially in relation 
to forest policy development and forest industries. 
890. KOEN, H. R. What intensive management of the 
forests will mean to the Ozark region of Oklahoma, 
Missouri, and Arkansas. J. Forestry 46:165-167. Mar. 
1948. 99.8 F768 
891. KOROLEFF, A. Stability as a factor in efficient 
forest management. Pulp & Paper Res. Inst. Canada 
Woodlands Res. Index 89(A-2-a),294 p. Ref. 1951. 
99.8 W855A 
Pt. 1, Forest labour management; Pt. 2, Forest 
management (consisting of a symposium by various 
authorities); Pt. 3, Planning for increased efficiency in 
the use of forest labour and forest areas, 
892. KRAUCH, H. Managing ponderosa pine for hewn 
cross ties. J. Forestry 47:371-374. May 1949. 
99.8 F768 
New Mexico. . 
893. LACHANCE, P. E. Sustained yield management 
in Quebec. Forestry Chron. 25:304-306. Dec.1949. 
99.8 F7623 
Public policy and private management situation. 
894. LAWSON, E. L., and ZASADA, Z. A. Closer 
utilization of black spruce—an essential to better forest 
management in Minnesota. Soc. Amer. Foresters Proc. 
1947:119-128. 1948. 99.9 So13 
Minnesota Division of Forestry, Minnesota & Ontario 
Paper Co., and U. S. Forest Service Lake States Forest 
Experiment Station, cooperating. 
Time and cost analysis of a pulpwood logging operation. 
895. LOUISIANA. STATE UNIVERSITY. SCHOOL OF 
FORESTRY. Management of young even-aged stands of 
southern pine. La. State U. Sch. Forestry Annu. Sym- 
posium Proc. 1,120 p. 1952. 99.9 L935 
Louisiana Forestry Commission, cooperating. 
Cover title, Young pine management. 
896. MCGOWIN, J. F. Factor of costs in manage- 
ment and silviculture in relation to logging: the South. 
Soc. Amer. Foresters Proc. 1947:237-239. 1948. 
99.9 So13 
897. MCLINTOCK, T. F. Management in Maine. 
Maine Forester 1950:43-50. Mar.1950. 99.9 M283 
898. MCLINTOCK, T. F. Practical management of 
spruce and fir—some observations. Soc. Amer. Forest- 
ers. N. Y. Sect. N. Y. Forester 9(2):1-3. May 1952. 
99.9 Sol3N 
Economic, social, and physical considerations in 
management in the Northeast: accessibility; labor supply; 
markets; and site quality. 
899. MCLINTOCK, T. F. Why forest management? 
Paper Indus. 1950:1314-1316. Feb.1950. 302.8 P1923 
900. METY, B. P. Intensive timber management in 
Arkansas. Pacific Logging Cong. Loggers Handb. 12:62- 
66. 1952. 99.76 P112La 
901. MEYER, H. A., RECKNAGEL, A. B., and 
STEVENSON, D. D. Forest management. New York, 
Ronald,1952. 290 p. Ref. 99.55 M57 
Contents: Scope and objectives of forest management; 
History and present status of forest management; General 
organization of forest property for management; Forest 
regulation; Management plans. 
Some sections of economic significance within the con- 
tents are: Economic limitations of forest management, 
p. 6-8; Types of forest lands subject to management, p. 8- 
10; Legal aspects of forest land ownership, p. 27-29; 
Business aspects of forest management, including 
property appraisal, taxation, cost accounting and control, 
and timber sales, p. 70-88; Economic and financial rota- 
tions, p. 97-103. 
902. MILLER, J. E. Ownership and management of 
the commercial forests of the United States. Durham, 
1948. 56 p. 
Thesis (M.F.) - Duke University. 
~ 
26 
FOREST MANAGEMENT--CONTINUED. 
903. MOWAT, E. L. Preliminary guides for the 
management of lodgepole pine in Oregon and Washington. 
U.S. Forest Serv. Pacific Nowest. Forest & Range Expt. 
Sta. Res. Note 54,10 p. Apr.29,1949. 1.9 F7629Fr 
Chiefly general statements about economic guides for 
cutting procedures. 
904. ORCHARD, C. D. Forest management. Brit. 
Columbia. Forest Serv. P. B. 40,24 p. 1949. 99.9 B77Pb 
905. ORCHARD, C. D. Forest management angles. 
Soc. Amer. Foresters North. Calif. Sect. Papers 1949: 
36-42. 1950. 99.9 Sol3Pa 
906. PUTNAM, J. A. Management of bottomland 
hardwoods. U.S. Forest Serv. South. Forest Expt. Sta. 
Occas. Paper 116,60 p. Mar.1951. 1.9 F76240 
Includes economic considerations behind the techniques 
described. 
907. PUTNAM, J. A. The relationship of utilization 
to silvicultural management in bottomland hardwoods. J. 
Forestry 49:783-786. Nov.1951. 99.8 F768 
Sections as follows: Utilization limits silviculture; 
Handling the overburden; Applying hardwood log grades; 
How it works; Marketing hardwoods complex; Need for 
integrated utilization. 
908. REVEAL, J., and WALLEN, A. The redwood 
forest handbook. Sacramento, Calif. Div. Forestry,1948. 
160 p. 99 R32 
U. S. Forest Service and the Redwood Forest Practice 
Committee, cooperating. 
Includes costs and returns of partial cutting, tree size 
in relation to logging costs and lumber yields, stumpage 
sales practice, costs and productivity of log and pulpwood 
production by tractor. 
909. REYNOLDS, R. R. Get your money's worth 
from forestry. U.S. Forest Serv. South. Forest Expt. 
Sta. Occas. Paper 112,7 p. Aug.1948. 1.9 F76240 
Paper delivered before the Southern Pulpwood Conser- 
vation Association. Valuation and returns, as illustrated 
by results obtained at Crossett Experimental Forest, 
Arkansas. 
910. REYNOLDS, R. R. Profit possibilities from in- 
tensive management of loblolly pine. J. Forestry 50:294- 
296. Apr.1952. 99.8 F768 
Suggested by results at Crossett Experimental Forest, 
Arkansas. 
911. SILVERSIDES, C. R. Comparison between 
present method of operating woodlands and proposed 
sustained yield operation (hypothetical case). Pulp & 
Paper Res. Inst. Canada Woodlands Res. Index 89:219- 
227, 1951, 99.8 W855A 
Compares costs and yields. 
912. SOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERS. INLAND 
EMPIRE SECT. FOREST PRACTICE COMMITTEE. 
Forest practices for the Inland Empire. J. Forestry 46: 
550-557. July 1948. 99.8 F768 
913. STERNITZKE, H. S., and JAMES, L. M. 
Arkansas timber stands before and after cutting. U.S. 
Forest Serv. South. Forest Expt. Sta. Forest Survey Re- 
lease 67,15 p. May 1951. 1.9 F7624F 
Abstract by H. S. Sternitzke in J. Forestry 49:704. 
Oct.1951. 99.8 F768 
914. TOOLE, A. W. Commercial forestry in north- 
ern Michigan. Lake States Timber Digest 2(12):3. Mar. 
25,1948. 99.81 L14 
Economic problems common to private and public 
management. 
915. VAUX, H. J. Some economic aspects of grow- 
ing sugar pine in California. U. S. Forest Serv. Calif. 
Forest & Range Expt. Sta. Forest Res. Note 58,33 p. 
Sept.1948. 1.9 F7626R 
Contents: Sugar pine forests in California; Sugar pine 
markets and prospective requirements; Long-run market 
outlook; Trends in sugar pine values; Cost elements in 
growing Sugar pine. 
916. WATTS, L. F. Utilization, the keystone of in- 
tensive forest management. Forest Prod. Res. Soc. J. 2 
(5):18-23. Dec.1952. 99.9 F76625 
917. WESTERN FORESTRY AND CONSERVATION 
ASSOCIATION. Permanent forest production; an analysis 
of sustained yield management in western forests. 
Portland, Oreg.,1948. 62 p. 99.61 W524 
918. WESTERN FORESTRY AND CONSERVATION 
ASSOCIATION. WEST COAST FORESTRY PROCEDURES 
COMMITTEE. Reports on various recommended forest 
practices and techniques, 1/7. Portland, Oreg.,1950. 
57 p. 99.9 W523 
Includes some discussion of economic implications of 
Douglas-fir tree grades and of forest inventories in in- 
