“FOREST MANAGEMENT--CONTINUED. 
Release and Other Improvement Practices; 
Prescribed Burning 
1474. AREND, J. L., and STEPHENSON, J. R. Some 
costs and effects of chemical release of [red] pine in 
northern Michigan. U. S. Forest Serv. Lake States 
Forest Expt. Sta. Tech. Notes 367,1 p. Jan.1952. 
1.9 F7625T 
The release methods tested were cutting and girdling, 
Ammate in notches and cups, and basal sprays. 
1475. BURKETT, L. 8S. Plantation release, impor- 
tance and cost. Lake States Timber Digest 3(20):3. Sept. 
1949. 99.81 L14 
1476. CHAIKEN, L. E. The use of chemicals to con- 
trol inferior trees in the management of loblolly pine. 
U. S. Forest Serv. Soeast. Forest Expt. Sta. Sta. Paper 
10,34 p. Ref. Sept.1951. 1.9622 S4St2 
Costs and comparative efficiency of poisoning and 
girdling methods. 
1477. CLARK, S. F., and WILLISTON, H. L. Cost of 
girdling low-grade hardwoods. U.S. Forest Serv. South. 
Forest Expt. Sta. South. Forestry Notes 58:3. Nov.1948. 
1.9 F7624S 
1478. ENGLE, L. G. Girdling northern hardwood wolf 
trees. J. Forestry 46:925-926. Dec.1948. 99.8 F768 
Includes a productivity table. 
1479. GRANE, C. X. Effectiveness of Ammate |am- 
monium eulamate| in controlling hardwoods. South. 
Lumberman 185(2316):44,46,48,50. Oct.1,1952. 99.81 S08 
Includes costs of various treatments, applied in Arkan- 
sas, by the U. S. Forest Service Southern Forest Experi- 
ment Station. 
1480. HARTMAN, A. W. Fire as a tool in southern 
pine. Trees, U.S.D.A. Ybk. 1949:517-527. 1 Ag84Y 
1481. HOOKOM, D. W. Protecting the future; the 
battle against hardwood encroachment in southern pine 
forests means millions of dollars to the lumber industry. 
South. Lum erman 180(2258):44,46,48. May 1,1950. 
99.81 S082 
Chiefly costs and comparative methods of using 
Ammate. 
1482. HUCKENPAHLER, B. J. Ax or poison [in tree- 
killing]? South. Lumberman 185(2321):180-182. Dec.15, 
1952. 99.81 S082 
Compares costs and effectiveness of girdling and 
poisoning hardwoods in Mississippi. 
1483. KLEIN, J. A. Girdling and poisoning of live 
culls. U.S. Forest Serv. Alaska Forest Res. Center 
Tech. Note 13,1 p. Mar.1951. 1.962 A3T22 
A time study. 
1484. LITTLE, S., ALLEN, J. P., and MOORE, E. B. 
Controlled burning as a dual-purpose tool of forest 
management in New Jersey. J. Forestry 46:810-3819. 
Ref. Nov.1948. 99.8 F768 
Includes cost analysis. 
1485. MANN, W. F., JR. Industry releases pine for 
profit. South. Lumberman 180(2257):38-39. Apr.15,1950. 
99.81 S082 
Includes costs of girdling, poisoning, and release 
cutting, determined by studies by U. S. Forest Service 
Southern Forest Experiment Station. 
1486. MANN, W. F. Profits from release of loblolly 
and shortleaf pine seedlings. J. Forestry 49:250-253. 
Apr.1951, 99.8 F768 
1487. MUNTZ, H. H. Time requirements for timber 
stand improvement in north Alabama. South. Weed Conf. 
Proc. 5:148-i51. 1952. 79.9 So8 
Girdling hardwoods in the pine-hardwood region of 
north-central Alabama, on the Flat Top Experimental 
Forest of the U. S. Forest Service Southern Forest Ex- 
periment Station. Compares effectiveness of chemical 
treatment. 7 
1488. PEEVY, F. A. How to control southern upland 
hardwoods with Ammate. New Orleans,U. S. Forest Serv. 
South. Forest Expt. Sta.,1949. 5 p. 1.9622 S2H832 
Includes costs. 
1489. PEEVY, F. A., and CAMPBELL, R. S. Poison- 
ing southern upland weed trees. J. Forestry 47:443-447. 
Ref. June 1949. 99.8 F768 
Cooperative study by U. S. Forest Service Southern 
Forest Experiment Station. Includes cost analysis. 
1490. PICKENS, E. J. A preliminary survey of 
methods employed and certain cost factors associated 
res brush treatment in Texas. College Station,1948. 
p. 
Thesis (M.S.) - Agricultural and Mechanical College of 
Texas. 
43 
FOREST MANAGEMENT--CONTINUED. 
1491. ROE, E. 1. Early release from aspen improves 
yield of pine plantations. U.S. Forest Serv. Lake States 
Forest Expt. Sta. Tech. Note 353,1 p. Apr.1951. 
1.9 F7625T 
Estimates cost of release and gives stumpage value of 
variously treated plantations in the Superior National 
Forest. 
1492. RUDOLF, P. O. Chemical control of brush and 
tree growth for the Lake States. U.S. Forest Serv. Lake 
States Forest Expt. Sta. Misc. Rpt. 15,30 p. Jan.1951. 
1.9622 L2M68 
Includes costs of herbicide application and lists of 
herbicide and equipment manufacturers. 
1493. SOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERS. ALLE- 
GHENY SECT, COMMITTEE ON FOREST MANAGEMENT. 
Report ... February 1951. J. Forestry 49:731-734. Oct. 
1951. 99.8 F768 
Low-grade hardwoods in forest management. 
1494. SOMES, H. A. Cost of prescribed burning [in 
the New Jersey pine region] continues to go down. U. S. 
Forest Serv. Noeast. Forest Expt. Sta. Noeast. Res. Note 
2:4, May 1951. 1.9622 N2N82 
1495. STOEKELER, J. H., and ARBOGAST, C. Power- 
saw girdling saves time in timber stand improvement. 
U. S. Forest Serv. Lake States Forest Expt. Sta. Tech. 
Notes 383,1 p. Oct.1952. 1.9 F7625T 
Compared with axe girdling of second-growth hard- 
woods, Argonne Experimental Forest, Wis. 
1496. STOEKELER, J. H., and HEINSELMAN, M. L. 
The use of herbicides for the control of alder brush and 
other swamp shrubs in the Lake States. J. Forestry 48: 
870-874. Ref. Dec.1950. 99.8 F768 
Includes costs of treatments. 
1497. TANNEHILL, G. F. Control of hardwood under- 
brush by bulldozing. J. Forestry 49:776-778. Nov.1951. 
99.8 F768 
Includes costs for experiment on Urania Lumber Co. 
lands in Louisiana. 
1498. THOMSON, C. C. The advantages of cleaning 
coniferous plantations when competing vegetation is 
leafless. Project M302. Canada Forest Serv. Silvic. L. 
36,2 p. Dec.1949. 99.9 C16S 
Saving in terms of labor, and damage to the residual 
stand. 
1499, U.S. FOREST SERV. Tests of P. M. products 
girdling machine, by L. E. Chaiken, V. S. Jensen, R. H. 
Fenton, andI. H. Sims. Washington,1952. 6 p. 
1.962 A2T23 
1500. YOCOM, H. A. Estimating the labor costs of 
girdling hardwoods. U. S. Forest Serv. South. Forest 
Expt. Sta. South. Forestry Notes 78:1-2. Mar.1952. 
1.9 F7624S 
1501. YOCOM, H. A. Estimating the time needed for 
girdling hardwoods. J. Forestry 50:484. June 1952. 
99.8 F768 
Time study made at Flat Top Experimental Forest, Ala. 
1502. ZEHNGRAFF, P., and VON BARGEN, J. 
Chemical brush control in forest management. J. Forest- 
ry 47:110-112. Feb.1949. 99.8 F76s 
Includes costs for tests run on the Chippewa National 
Forest, Minn. 
MANAGEMENT EMPHASIZING NON- TIMBER 
COMMODITIES AND USES 
1503. BRENNER, B. Land grabbers in National 
forests. Nation's Agr. 27(11):14-15. Dec.1952. 
280.82 B89 
Chiefly mining claims, granted by the U. S. Bureau of 
Land Management on U. S. Forest Service land. 
1504. GRANGER, C. M. Mining claims on the National 
forests; it's time to take another look. J. Forestry 50: 
355-358. May 1952. 99.8 F768 
1505. U. S. FOREST SERV. Report on mining claims 
on National forests. Rev. Washington,1951. 7 p. 
1.962 A2R2925 
Estimated number and status, on western National 
forests, and a discussion of interference with forest 
administration. 
1506. U.S. FOREST SERV. Special uses on the 
National forests. Washington,1952. 2 p. 1.962 A2Sp3 
A copy of the authorization for special-use permits, 
with comments on Forest Service policy. 
1507. U. S. FOREST SERV. DIV. OF RECREATION 
AND LANDS. Summary of the disposition of minerals 
owned by the United States on National forest land and 
other lands administered by the Forest Service. Wash- 
ington,1949. 13 p. 1.962 A2Sv63 
