FOREST MANAGEMENT--CONTINUED. 
1772. U. S. FOREST SERV. DIV. OF COOPERATIVE 
FOREST PROTECTION. Forest fire statistics, calendar 
years 1948-51. Washington,1949-52. 4 v. 1.962 C4F76 
Statistics for 1947-51 also available with the same title, 
1.9 F76Ffs. 
U. S. Dept. of the Interior, U. S. Soil Conservation Serv., 
U. S. Tennessee Valley Authority, and States, cooperating 
Includes areas protected and unprotected, fires occur- 
ing, by cause and size, and damage estimates. 
1773. U.S. FOREST SERV. SOUTHEASTERN FOREST 
EXPERIMENT STATION. Forest fires and fire danger in 
West Virginia, 1946-51. Asheville, N. C.,1948-52. 6 v. 
1.9622 S4F762 i 
Authors of separate volumes usually A. W. Lindenmuth 
and J. J. Keetch. 
1774. WILKINS, A. H. The story of the Maine forest 
fire disaster. J. Forestry 46:568-573. Aug.1948. 
99.8 F768 
Damage and Loss 
1775. BANKS, W. G., and OSTRANDER, M. D. The 
southeastern Maine fire area—four years later. U.S. 
Forest Serv. Noeast. Forest Expt. Sta. Noeast. Res. 
Notes 18,4 p. Dec.1952. 1.9622 N2N82 
Attempts to evaluate economic effects of the fires. 
1776. BASER, N. Damage appraisal made easy. 
Amer. Forests 55(10):17. Oct.1949. 99.8 F762 
Forest fire damage appraisal meter constructed in 
South Carolina. ; 
1777. BUCK, C. C., FONS, W. L., and COUNTRYMAN, 
C. M. Average fire damage from increased run-off and 
erosion on the Southern California National forests. 
Berkeley,U. S. Forest Serv., Calif. Forest & Range Expt. 
Sta.,1948. 21 p. 1.9622 C2Av3 
Damage appraisal in terms of dollars per acre, both 
current and predicted. Supplemented by detailed apprais- 
als from the forests involved: Angeles, 1.9622 C2F514; 
Cleveland, 1.9622 C2F512; Los Padres, 1.9622 C2F515; 
and San Bernadino, 1.9622 C2F513. 
1778. CHAPMAN, F. B. Wildlife losses from forest 
fires. Ohio Conserv. B. 16(10):20-21. Oct.1952. 
279.9 Oh330 
A study conducted by the Ohio Division of Wildlife. 
1779. GUSTAFSON, C. A. Impact of destructive 
forest fires on the timber resource of a management 
unit. Fire Control Notes 11(2):18-23. Apr.1950. 
1 F766Fi 
1780. *HAISLET, J. A. A study of forest fire damage 
appraisal. Durham,1951. 
Thesis (M.F.) - Duke University. 
1781. LINDENMUTH, A. W., KEETCH, J. J., and 
NELSON, R. M. Forest fire damage appraisal proce- 
dures and tables for the Northeast. U.S. Forest Serv. 
Soeast. Forest Expt. Sta. Sta. Paper 11,28 p. Sept.1951. 
1.9622 S4St2 
Basis of fire damage values, p. 11-14. 
1782. MITCHELL, J. A. Fire damage appraisal. 
Fire Control Notes 9(2/3):27-30. Apr./July 1948. 
1 F766Fi 
1783. ZIVNUSKA, J. A., ARNOLD, K., and ARMENT, 
C. Wildfire damage and cost far reaching [in California]. 
Calif. Agr. 4(9):9-11. Sept.1950. 100 C12Ag 
Control and Prevention Measures 
1784. BEATTIE, B. A timetable for large fire 
management. Fire Control Notes 13(3):38-40. July 1952. 
1 F766Fi : 
1785. BOSQUET, V. W. A [fire] protection program 
to follow logging. West. Forestry & Conserv. Assoc. 
Proc. 39:57-59. 1948. 99.9 W522 
1786. BOYLE, A. A. Crew and camp organization on 
the actual fire line. Pulp & Paper Mag. Canada 51(6): 
132,134. May 1950. 302.8 P96 
1787. BURGESS, T. H. Protection roads. West. 
Forestry & Conserv. Assoc. Proc. 41:54. 1950. 
99.9 W522 
Arguments for sharing costs. 
1788. BURGESS, R. H. The role of woods roads in _ 
fire fighting in N[ova] S[cotia]. Pulp & Paper Mag. 
Canada 50(3):246. Conv. Issue 1949. 302.8 P96 
1789. CANADA. FOREST SERV. Forest fire control 
plan for the Petawawa Forest Experiment Station, Chalk 
River, Ontario. Ottawa,Cloutier,1948. 37 p. 99.51. C165 
Includes cost, damage, and labor aspects. 
*Not examined. 
o1 
FOREST MANAGEMENT--CONTINUED. 
1790. COBB, S. S. An answer to forest fire preven- 
tion and control in anthracite coal fields. J. Forestry 50: 
834-837. Nov.1952. 99.8 F768 
Statistics on the use and effectiveness of smokechasers, 
by the Pennsylvania Department of Forests & Waters. 
1791. DRAKE, G. L. Snags and what to do about them. 
West. Forestry & Conserv. Assoc. Proc. 41:51-53. 1950. 
99.9 W522 
Includes reports on felling costs and utilization prac- 
tices by W. Hagenstein, D. Phipps, C. Richen, E. Heacox, 
K. Linstedt, R. St. Clair, B. Orell, A. Merrill, E. Aston, 
and E. Rettig. 
1792. HARTMAN, A. W. Machines and fires in the 
South. Trees, U.S.D.A. Ybk. 1949:527-532. 1 Ag84Y 
Includes the following tables: Cost of equipment; Char- 
acter of fire protection on commercial forest lands, 
United States, 1945; Number of fires, by causes, 1947; 
and tables on efficiency of men and machines. 
1793. HEACOX, E. F. Should limited clearance be 
granted by the State on unburned slash areas which, be- 
cause of silvicultural reasons, do not require hazard re- 
duction? West. Forestry & Conserv. Assoc. Proc. 42:43- 
46. 1951. 99.9 W522 
Comments by B. L. Orell, p.44-46. 
1794. HOWIE, E. L. Forest fire control planning. 
Pulp & Paper Mag. Canada 49(6):106,108,112,115. May 
1948. 302.8 P96 
Industrial planning, New Brunswick. 
1795. JOHNSON, F. J. G. We need certified fire 
wardens. Brit. Columbia Lumberman 35(10):53-54,126, 
130. Oct.1951. 99.81 B77 
Proposed cooperative forest fire control policy for 
British Columbia. 
1796. KIRKPATRICK,R. C. What the logger leaves. 
Wis. Conserv. B. 14(2):8-10. Feb.1949. 279.8 W752 
Slash disposal law, and enforcement in Wisconsin. 
1797, LEWIS, C. H., JR. Forest fire detection by air- 
plane exclusively. South. Lumberman 180(2260):46,48. 
Ref. June 1,1950. 99.81 So82 
Includes costs. The detection system is sponsored by 
private industry. 
1798. LITTLE, S., and SOMES, H, A. Slash disposal 
in oak-pine stands of southern New Jersey. U.S. Forest 
Serv. Northeast. Forest Expt. Sta. Sta. Paper 31,12 p. 
Nov.1949. 1.9622 N2St22 
1799. A LOW-cost tower project. J. Forestry 46:46- 
47. Jan.1948. 99.8 F768 
Maine Forest Service observation tower. 
1800. MCKEE, R. G. Slash problems in British 
Columbia. West. Forestry & Conserv. Assoc. Proc. 41: 
54-55. 1950. 99.9 W522 
In Idaho, by D. S. Jeffers. Ibid 41:56-57. 
British Columbia information also in Brit. Columbia 
Lumberman 35:106,108,110. Jan.1951. 99.81 B77 
1801. MERRILL, A. H. More intensive protection in 
the redwood region. West Forestry & Conserv. Assoc. 
Proc. 41:57-58. 1950. 99.9 W522 
Analyzes performance and costs of aerial patrol. 
1802. OLSON, D. S. Utilization of [western red] cedar 
slash. Nowest. Wood Prod. Clinic Proc. 6:49-51. 1951. 
99.9 Sp6 
As a part of fire-hazard reduction. 
1803. ROGERS, N.S. Weighing the risk of carrying 
unburned slash; what factors should be used. West. 
Forestry & Conserv. Assoc. Proc. 39:69-70. 1948. 
99.9 W522 
1804. TAYLOR, D. B. Suggestions for meeting in- 
creased slash hazard in British Columbia. Brit. Colum- 
bia Lumberman 34(5):44. May 1950. 99.81 B77 
Enabling legislation and economic problems. 
1805. U. S. FOREST SERV. CALIFORNIA REGION. 
1949 general cooperative agreement between United 
States Forest Service, Department of Agriculture and 
California Division of Forestry, Department of Natural 
Resources for reciprocal use of telephone lines and other 
fire control structures. Washington,1950. 8 p. 
1.9621 R50n2 
1806. U. S. FOREST SERV. DIV. OF FIRE CONTROL. 
History of smoke jumping, 1939-49. Fire Control Notes 
11(3):1-11. July 1950. 1 F766Fi 
1807. WATTS, L. F. Saving forests with aircraft. 
Hagerstown, Md., Fairchild Engine & Airplane Corp., 
1951? Sp. 99.51 W342 
From Fairchild's publication, The Pegasus. 
Tabulates smoke-jumping activities of the U. S. Forest 
Service, and reductions in fire loss in the Northern 
Rocky Mountain region since the introduction of the pro- 
gram. 
