FOREST MANAGEMENT--CONTINUED. 
1808. WEBB, H. A. The role of woods roads in fire 
fighting [in New Brunswick]. Pulp & Paper Mag. Canada 
50(3):244,246. Conv. Issue,1949. 302.8 P96 
1809. WILSON, K. O. Operation redskin. Fire Control 
Notes 13(3):1-3. July 1952. 1 F766Fi 
Analysis of the adaptability and performance of Indian 
fire-fighting crews in the Southwest. 
Protection from Insects and Disease 
1810. BAXTER, D. V. Pathology in forest practice. 
Ed. 2. New York, Wiley,1952. 601 p. Ref. 464.07 B33P 
Ch. 3, Loss and appraisal of damage, includes legal 
principles involved, money value of shade and park trees, 
valuation of damage to standing timber, and expressions 
of loss in terms of mortality, cull, and log grade. A table 
estimates heart-rot losses in saw timber stands of the 
United States, as of 1945. 
1811. BEAL, J. A. A coordinated forest pest control 
program. West. Forestry & Conserv. Assoc. Proc. 41: 
58-60. 1950. 99.9 W522 
1812. BEAL, J. A. Role of the States and private 
timber owners in cooperative forest pest control. J. 
Forestry 50:859-861. Nov.1952. 99.8 F768 
Under the Forest Pest Control Act. 
1813. BROCKMAN, F. The spruce budworm [in 
Washington and Oregon]. Wash. State Forestry Conf. 
Annu. Mtg. 28:32-34. 1949. 99.9 W276 
1814. BROWN, R. C., MACALONEY, H. J., and DOW- 
DEN, P. B. The spruce budworm. Trees, U.S.D.A. Ybk. 
1949:423-427. 1 Ag84Y 
1815. CANADA. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE. DIV. OF 
FOREST BIOLOGY. Annual report of the forest insect 
and disease survey, 1947-51. Ottawa,1948-52. 5 v. 
423.92 C162 
Until 1951, surveyed the forest-insect situation only. 
1816. CANN, J.J. The beetle battle, a fight for sur- 
vival in Mississippi. South. Lumberman 185(2321):150- 
153. Dec.15,1952. 99.81 S082 
qepper eve control of the southern pine beetle outbreak, 
1952. 
1817. CRAIGHEAD, F. C., and HUTCHINS, L. M. The 
control of insects and diseases in North American 
forests. United Nations Sci. Conf. Conserv. & Util. Re- 
sources Proc, 5:55-57. 1949,pub.1951. 279.9 Un32P 
1818. EVENDEN, J. C., and JOST, E. J. A report of 
the tussock moth control, North Idaho, 1947. Washington, 
1950? 52p. 1.967 F4R29 
Potlatch Timber Protective Association, Idaho State 
Forestry Department, and U. S. Forest Service, coop- 
erating. 
1819. GRAHAM, S. A. Forest entomology. Ed. 3. 
New York,McGraw-Hill,1952. 351 p. Ref. 423 G762 
Some chapters containing economic information about 
insect damage, control policies and programs, are 2, 
Historical review; 3, Detection and appraisal; and 8, 
Direct control by chemical methods, which includes 
aerial spraying. 
1820. HAGENSTEIN, W. D. A winged fifth column 
spruce budworm] in Pacific Northwest forests. Wash. 
tate Forestry Conf. Annu. Mtg. 29:30-32. 1950. 
99.9 W276 
A statistical breakdown of lands affected, and their 
ownership, in addition to control costs. 
1821. HARVEST plan to check spruce beetle in Inland 
Empire area. Timberman 53(12):96,98,100,103. Oct. 
1952. 99.81 T484 
Surveys and salvage plans by Government agencies for 
timber killed by Dendroctonus engelmanni. 
J. Neils Lumber Co., cooperating. 
1822. HEPTING, G. H. Forest tree diseases [in 
North Carolina]. N. C. Conserv. Cong. 1:89-92. 1952. 
279.9 C7633 
Includes relations of damage to stumpage value. 
1823. KOWAL, R. J., and COYNE, J. F. Forest insect 
problems in the South. (Abs.) Assoc. South. Agr. 
Workers Proc. 49:91. 1952. 4 C82 
Estimates losses from various outbreaks: pine sawfly, 
southern pine beetle, and the black turpentine beetle. 
1824. MATTHEWS, D.N., and HUTCHISON, S. B. 
Development of a blister rust control policy for the 
National forests in the Inland Empire. U.S. Forest Serv. 
North. Rocky Mountain Forest & Range Expt. Sta. Sta. 
Paper 16,116 p. Ref. Dec.1948. 1.9622 N3St1 
Includes costs of control, and economic aspects of 
western white pine. 
52 
FOREST MANAGEMENT--CONTINUED. 
1825. MORRIS, R. F. Importance of insect control in 
a forest management program. Canad. Ent. 83:176-181. 
July 1951. 421 C16 
Economic considerations, p.180. 
1826. MOWAT, E. L. Selection cutting reduces 
ponderosa pine losses at Pringle Falls [Oreg.]. U.S. 
Forest Serv. Pacific Nowest. Forest & Range Expt. Sta. 
Forest Res. Notes 45,3 p. Oct.13,1948. 1.9 F7629Fr 
Relative effectiveness of thrift selection and value 
selection in reducing losses from Dendroctonus beetles. 
1827. NELSON, A. L. Beetles kill four billion board 
feet of Engelmann spruce in Colorado. J. Forestry 48: 
182-183. Mar.1950. 99.8 F768 
Includes commercial utilization of killed timber. 
1828. OREGON. STATE BOARD OF FORESTRY. Re- 
port on the spruce budworm control project, 1949-51. 
Portland, Oreg.,1951-52. 3v. 423.9 Or3 
1829. OREGON. STATE BOARD OF FORESTRY. 
Spruce budworm control plan for 1950 in Oregon and 
Washington. Portland, Oreg.,1949. 11 p. 430 Or3 
Washington State Division of Forestry, 16 other public 
and private agencies, cooperating. Bh 
1830. POPHAM, W. L. Development of the coopera- _ 
tive effort in forest pest control. West. Forestry & Con- 
sery. Assoc. Proc. 40:46-48. 1949. 99.9 W522 
Also in J. Forestry 48:321-323. May 1950. 99.8 F768 
Programs and operations in areas cooperating with the 
U. S. Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine. 
1831. RADCLIFFE, D. N. An appraisal of seed dam- 
age by the Douglas fir cone moth [Barbara colfaxiana], in 
British Columbia. Forestry Chron. 28(2):19-24. June 
1952. 99.8 F7623 
Includes damage appraisal in terms of costs. 
1832. RICHMOND, H. A. Forest insect control pro- 
gram in British Columbia. West. Forestry & Conserv. 
Assoc. Proc. 40:49-50. 1949. 99.9 W522 
1833. RITTER, L. B. Blister rust control in Minne- 
sota. Conserv. Volunteer 12(70):46-49. May/June 1949. 
279.8 C765 
1834. ROBERTS, P. H., and EVENDEN, J. C. Con- 
trolling the tussock moth. Trees, U.S.D.A. Ybk. 1949: 
436-442. 1 Ag84y 
1835. ROHWER, S. A. The key to protection [against 
insects]. Trees, U.S.D.A. Ybk. 1949:413-417. 1 Ag84Y 
Includes a table estimating volumes of timber killed 
by pine beetles. 
1836. ROHWER, S. A. What economic studies and 
surveys are needed for development of a sound national 
program of insect and disease control? J. Forestry 48: 
194-197. Mar.1950. 99.8 F768 
The Forest Pest Control Act.is used as an example of 
implementation. 
1837. RUSDEN, P. L. Blister rust damage at Water- 
ford, Vermont. J. Forestry 50:545-551. Ref. July 1952. 
99.8 F768 
1838. SOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERS. UPPER 
MISSISSIPPI VALLEY SECT. FOREST PROTECTION 
COMMITTEE, The white pine blister rust control prob- 
lem in northern Minnesota. J. Forestry 47:235-238. 
Mar.1949. 99.8 F768 
Purpose of the committee's investigation was to study 
costs and effectiveness. 
1839. STRUBLE, G. R. Pine blow-down causes out- 
break of western pine beetle. J. Forestry 46:129-130. 
Feb.1948. 99.8 F768 : 
Areas infested by Dendroctonus brevicomis and number 
of trees killed. 
1840. SWANSON, H. E. White pine blister rust con- 
trol in the Inland Empire. Wash. State Forestry Conf. 
Annu. Mtg. 29:23-28. 1950. 99.9 W276 
Includes discussion of costs compared with stumpage 
recovery. 
1841. U. S. BUR. OF ENTOMOLOGY AND PLANT 
QUARANTINE. Status of white pine blister rust control 
by land ownership, 1947. Washington,1948. 1 p. 
1.967 A2St252 
U. S. Forest Service and U. S. Department of the 
Interior, cooperating. 
1842. U. S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE. FOREST IN- 
SECT AND DISEASE CONSULTANTS. Meeting of Forest 
Insect and Disease Consultants. Washington,1952. 9 p. 
1.91 C2F76 
An account of the meeting of consultants appointed by 
Secretary Brannan and representatives of the U. S. Forest 
Service, U. S. Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quaran- 
tine, U. S. Department of the Interior, and U. S. Agricul- 
tural Research Administration, to discuss cooperative 
programs in forest pest and disease control. 
