FOREST MANAGEMENT--CONTINUED. 
1843. U. S. FOREST SERV. Engelmann spruce bark 
beetle control project, Colorado, 1950. Washington,1950? 
lv. 1.962 A2En3 
U. S. Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine, 
cooperating. 
Includes values at stake, and an analysis of control 
operations. - 
1844. WHITESIDE, J. M. Control [of spruce budworm] 
through aerial spraying. Canad. Inst. Forestry Maritime 
Sect. Annu. Rpt. 15:19-24. 1952. 99.9 C1672 
Accomplishments and costs of spraying programs in the 
Pacific Northwest. 
1845. WOODS, J. B. The forest insect control pro- 
gram for Oregon. West. Forestry & Conserv. Assoc. 
Proc. 40:50-51. 1949. 99.9 W522 
1846. WYGANT, N. D., and NELSON, A. L. Four 
billion feet of beetle-killed spruce. Trees, U.S.D.A. Ybk. 
1949:417-422. 1 Ag84Y 
Programs to salvage Engelmann spruce killed in Colo- 
rado. 
VALUATION 
1847. ANDERSON, I. V. Valuation of ponderosa pine 
stumpage by use of tree grades. Missoula,U. S. Forest 
Serv.,North. Rocky Mountain Forest & Range Expt. Sta., 
1951. 12 p. 1.962 A2An2 
Paper delivered Sept. 27, 1951, at annual conference of 
Inland Empire Section, Forest Products Research Society, 
Sandpoint, Idaho. 
Also in Forest Prod. Res. Soc. J. 2(1):90-94. Apr.1952. 
99.9 F76625 
1848. AUFDERHEIDE, R. Advantages of detailed pre- 
sale layout and logging plan. U.S. Forest Serv. Pacific 
Nowest. Forest & Range Expt. Sta. Forest Res. Note 42, 
7p. Apr.1,1948. 1.9 F7629Fr 
1849. BRINKMAN, K. A., and KRAJICEK, J. E. 
Growth of a white pine plantation in Iowa. U.S. Forest 
Serv. Cent. States Forest Expt. Sta. Sta. Notes 61,2 p. 
June 1950. 1.9 F762525S 
Includes brief theoretical valuation. 
1850. BURKLE, J. L., and GUTTENBERG, S. Marking 
guides for oaks and yellow-poplar in the southern uplands. 
U.S. Forest Serv. South. Forest Expt. Sta. Occas. Paper 
125,27 p. Jan.1952. 1.9 F76240 
Applying tree-log grades and conversion surplus com- 
putation to determine the ''mature" tree. 
1851. CAMPBELL, R. A., PRICE, H. R., and MORIN, 
R. A. Timber estimating by tree grade. South. Lumber- 
man 181(2273):243-245. Dec.15,1950. 99.81 S082 
A cooperative study by U. S. Forest Service Southeast- 
ern Forest Experiment Station, North Carolina Division 
of Forestry, and U. S. Tennessee Valley Authority 
Division of Forestry Relations. 
1852. CLOUD, M. C. Saw-timber versus pulpwood. 
South Lumberman 179(2241):35. Aug.15,1949. 99.81S082 
1853. COPE, J. A. The productive and reproductive 
capacity of forest soils. J. Forestry 46:687-688. Sept. 
1948. 99.8 F768 
Returns from a 5-acre block in New York State. 
1854. DUERR, W. A. Guides to profitable forest 
management [in the South]. J. Forestry 49:771-773. 
Nov.1951. 99.8 F768 
Also in Unit 30:25-30. Feb.15,1950. 99.9 Un34 
Includes information about tree utilization and financial 
maturity derived from research conducted by the U. S. 
Forest Service Southern Forest Experiment Station. 
1855. ENGLE, L. G. Volume and value growth of 
sugar maple in upper Michigan. Ann Arbor,1949. 41 p. 
Ref. 
Thesis (M.F.) - University of Michigan. 
Includes log grades and log value per tree. 
1856. EVANS, T., and MCCLAY, T. A. Rules-of- 
thumb for volume and value in pulpwood trees. U. S. For- 
est Serv. Soeast. Forest Expt. Sta. Res. Notes 4,2 p. 
Jan.1952. 1.9622 S4R312 
Also in Unit 44:17-18. Oct.1953. 99.9 Un34 
1857. FERENCE, G. M. The stumpage value of a 
mature loblolly pine stand in the Durham Division of 
Duke Forest, based on the Santee tree grading system. 
Durham,1951. 26 p. 
Thesis (M.F.) - Duke University. 
1858. FERREE, M. J. Growth, cull, and mortality as 
factors in managing timber in the Anthracite Region. 
U. S. Forest Serv. Noeast. Forest Expt. Sta. Sta. Paper 
15,21 p. July 6,1948. 1.9622 N2St22 
In relation to stumpage values and financial maturity. 
53 
FOREST MANAGEMENT--CONTINUED. 
1859. FRANK, B. Forest resource evaluation in the 
public interest. Soc. Amer. Foresters Proc. 1947:65-75. 
Ref. 1948. 99.9 So13 
Includes current valuation methods, watershed prob- 
lems, damage appraisal, recreation and wildlife values. 
1860. GEVORKIANTZ, S. R. For more and better oak 
ties. Cross Tie B. 29(12):18-20,22. Dec.1948. 
99.82 C87 
How site quality affects yield; net return from cutting 
for ties compared with that of cutting for lumber. 
1861. GEVORKIANTZ, S. R., and others. A method of 
evaluating land for pulpwood production. J. Forestry 46: 
674-678. Sept.1948. 99.8 F768 
F. G. Kilp, R. C. Dosen, and O. A. Schmidt, joint 
authors. 
U. S. Forest Service Lake States Forest Experiment 
Station and Nekoosa-Edwards Paper Co., cooperating. 
1862, GUTTENBERG, S., and PUTNAM, J. A. Finan- 
cial maturity of bottomland red oaks and sweet gum. U.S. 
Forest Serv. South. Forest Expt. Sta. Occas. Paper 117, 
24 p. Mar.1951. 1.9 F76240 
Includes log-tree grading. 
1863. GUTTENBERG, S. G. Good trees—good lum- 
ber—surer profits. South. Lumberman 179(2249):132-135. 
Dec.15,1949. 99.81 S082 
Tree, log, and lumber values in southern pine. 
1864. GUTTENBERG, S. The rate of interest in 
forest management. J. Forestry 48:3-7. Ref. Jan.1950. 
99.8 F768 
Comment by R. Moore, 48:288-289. Apr.1950. 
1865. HAIGH, W. S. Comparative appraised values of 
major products from southern pine. Durham,1949. 40 p. 
Ref. 
Thesis (M.F.) - Duke University. 
Products appraised are sawlogs, pulpwood, poles, 
turpentine, and combinations. 
1866. HAMILTON, L. S. An economic analysis of the 
cutting of sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.) in small 
woodlots in the vicinity of Syracuse. Syracuse,1950. 
128 p. Ref. 
Thesis (M.F.) - State University of New York, College 
of Forestry. 
An investigation of tree value, and those factors affect- 
ing it; time and cost analyses of log-making, skidding, 
hauling, and loading; tree grades and log grades; applica- 
tions of value realizations and economic increment; 
marketing factors. 
1867. HOLSOE, T. Profitable tree forms of yellow- 
poplar. W. Va. Agr. Expt. Sta. B. 341,23 p. June 1950. 
100 W52 
1868. HOLT, L. Cellulose production in Canadian 
forests. Pulp & Paper Res. Inst. Canada Woodlands Res. 
Index 70(F-1),8 p. July 1949. 99.8 W855A 
Evaluation of site productivity; the allowable cost for 
silviculture, especially in converting sites to spruce for 
pulpwood. 
1869. KAGIS, I. 
ae saskatchewan}: 
952, 99.8 F762 
One of the problems is value loss as the softwood com- 
ponents of the stand mature. 
1870. LIGHTSEY, W. F. A comparison of values of 
various utilizations of hardwood trees in north central 
North Carolina. Durham,1948. 36 p. 
Thesis (M.F.) - Duke University. 
Values as lumber, veneer, crossties, or variations of 
these products, for oak, yellowpoplar, and sweetgum. 
1871. MCCLAY, T. A. Analysis of some factors 
affecting stumpage value of farm timber. Durham,1949. 
31 p. Ref. 
Thesis (M.F.) - Duke University. 
The economic factors tested statistically are civil 
district, reason for selling, and knowledge of timber 
value. Physical factors are tested also. 
1872. MARTINELLI, M. The conversion of flat-rate 
stumpage value to specific rate for individual tree grade. 
J. Forestry 46:844-845. Nov.1948. 99.8 F768 
_ 1873. MARTINELLI, M. A study of the factors con- 
tributing to the value of pine stumpage in the vicinity of 
Durham, North Carolina. Durham,1948. 22 p. 
Film 99.57 M362 
Thesis (M.F.) - Duke University. 
Valuation of stumpage in terms of number of sawlog 
trees by grade, volume by grade, logging chance, and 
area of the stand. 
1874. MATTHEWS, D. M. Methods of stumpage 
appraisal. Toronto,Ont. Dept. Lands & Forests,1948. 
100 p. (Manual of Timber Management Part 5) FS 
Some problems of mixedwood stands 
Forestry Chron. 28(2):6-18. June 
