INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE--CONTINUED. 
Southern States 
2004. APPALACHIAN HARDWOOD MANUFACTURERS. 
Appalachian area officially defined. South. Lumberman 
183(2290):32. Sept.1,1951. 99.81 So82 
Defines boundaries. A map shows the area now officially 
designated as the Appalachian hardwood- producing 
territory. 
2005. BRUCKART, R. F., and CRUM, W. J. Produc- 
tivity in the southern lumber industry. South. Lumber- 
man 182(2282):56,58. May 1,1951. 99.81 S082 
Part of a survey conducted by the Texas Engineering 
Experiment Station. Includes statistical charts for sales 
and employee turnover. 
2006. BURNS, H. E. Where the South stands—a mid- 
century view of the national lumber picture. South. Lum- 
ber J. 54(2):14,74. Feb.1950. 99.81 So8 
Statistical portion based on 1947 Census of Manufac- 
tures. 
2007. FLORIDA. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE. Indus- 
trial progress in Florida. Tallahassee,1950. 91 p. 
280.017 F663 
An informal report containing some statistical sum- 
maries, including wood products industries, naval stores, 
palm products, Spanish moss, and others peculiar to the 
region. 
Supplemented by a similar publication of the same year 
and of the same title, 280.017 F662Re, and by the 1948 
report, 280.017 F662R 
2008. GARRISON, P. M. Utilization of low quality 
southern hardwoods and its effect on forest management. 
Wood Prod. 54(3):20,22. Mar.1949. 99.82 W856 
2009. GREELEY, W. B. Forty years of southern 
forestry. South. Lumberman 176(2209):44,46. Apr.15, 
1948. 99.81 So82 
Chiefly a forest industry review. 
2010. HERRING, H. Southern resources for industrial 
development. Richmond, Dietz,1948. 81 p. (University 
of North Carolina Institute for Research in Social Science, 
Studies of Southern Resources, Monograph 2.) 
280.002 H43S 
_ Southern Association of Science and Industry, cooperat- 
ing. 
Includes wood industries, with information about logging 
and milling, furniture, house construction, naval stores, 
tannins, pulp and paper, smaller products, and wood- 
residue utilization. eae a ie 
2011. JAMES, L. M., and TOFTE, A. L. Mississippi's 
forest industry. U.S. Forest Serv. South. Forest Expt. 
Sta. Forest Survey Release 62,45 p. Nov.1949. 
1.9 F7624F 
Contents: Income and employment; Production; Location 
of plants processing raw products; Location of timber- 
cutting operations; Movement of timber products to plants; 
How lumber production varies by size of sawmill; Effect 
of cutting on stands; The outlook for timber production, 
including naval stores and other products. : 
2012. JAMES, L. M. Timber supplies for industry in 
Mississippi. South. Econ. J. 18:61-71. July 1951. 
280.8 S084 
Discusses timber supply in terms of requirements and 
adaptations in the sawlog, pulpwood, veneer, cooperage, 
naval stores, and other forest industries. 
2013. LINN, E. R. A forest industries survey of 
Oklahoma. Okla. Agr. Expt. Sta. B. B-325,35 p. Dec. 
1948. 100 Ok4 
Contents: Size and economic importance; Oklahoma 
forest areas; Historical development; Directory of the 
wood-using industries of Oklahoma; Oklahoma sawmill 
industry by counties—1947; Analysis of wood-using plants 
other than sawmills. 
2014. LOUISIANA. DEPT. OF LABOR. Special report 
on Louisiana's forest products industries. Baton Rouge, 
1950. 11 p. Dept. Labor Libr. 
Louisiana Forestry Commission, cooperating. 
Includes production statistics and employment aspects. 
2015. MCGOWIN, E. M. Building for consumer con- 
fidence. South. Lumberman 178(2228):63-64. Feb.1,1949. 
99.81 S082 
Southern lumber markets and industry conditions. 
Comments on the industry's reaction to government con- 
trols. 
2016. MANUFACTURERS' RECORD. [Series on in- 
dustry and economy in Southern States]. rs. Rec. 117 
(5)-121(11). May 1948-Nov.1952. 297.8 M31 
Each State story (entitled, for example, The Arkansas 
story) contains a section on forest products and timber. 
INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE--CONTINUED. 
Georgia, in 117(5):98-101. May 1943; Kentucky, in 117 
(11):90-92. Nov.1948; Virginia, in 118(5):88-89. May 
1949; Louisiana, in 118(9):87-89. Sept.1949; Alabama, in 
119(3):93-94, Mar.1950; North Carolina, in 119(9):84-85. 
Sept.1950; Arkansas, in 120(2):70-72. Feb.1951; Missis- 
sippi, in 120(6):79-81. June 1951; Texas, in 120(11):117- 
119. Nov.1951; South Carolina, in 121(4):85-88. Apr. 
1952; Florida, in 121(9):73-81. Sept.1952; Tennessee, in 
121(11):97-99. Nov.1952. 
2017. NATIONAL PLANNING ASSOCIATION. New in- - 
dustry comes to the South; a summary of the report... on 
location of industry. Natl. Planning Assoc. Comt. of the 
South Rpt. 1,32 p. May 1949. 280.002 N21 
2018. SMITH, W. P. Statistical summary of forest- 
products industries in the Tennessee Valley. Norris, 
U.S. Tenn. Val. Authority Div. Forestry Relat.,1949. 
19 p. 173.2 T25Sta 
Tabular information on sawmills and other forest in- 
dustries: production, employment, wages, product value, 
and stumpage cut. 
2019. STEIN, W. A. The potential demand for wood in 
the Eighth District. Fed. Reserve Bank St. Louis Mon. 
Rev. 30:57-64. May 1,1948. 284.8 F31Sa 
Includes timber drain, and industrial users of wood in 
the District. : 
2020. STEIN, W. H. Wood processing industries in 
the Eighth District. Fed. Reserve Bank St. Louis Mon. 
Rev. 30:29-35. Mar.1,1948. 284.8 F31Sa 
Includes the basic lumber industry, wood-using indus- 
_tries, pulp and paper. Estimates wood requirements. 
2021. WALKER, C. R. South's lumber sales to top $3 
billion in '48. Mfrs. Rec. 117(10):39-40. Oct.1948. 
297.8 M31 
Lumber and furniture industry situation. 
2022. YOUNG, V. Problems and opportunities com- 
mon to the lumber and pulp industries [in the South]. 
Unit 24:11-16. Aug.1948. 99.9 Un34 
Western States and Alaska 
2023. ANDERSON, I. V. Forest products industries 
of Montana. Mont. State U. Bur. Business & Econ. Res. 
Mont. Business 2(9):1-3. Sept.1950. 280.9 M762 
2024. ANDREWS, H. J. The Pacific Northwest as a 
future source of forest products for California. Soc. 
Amer. Foresters North. Calif. Sect. Papers 1949:7-11.. 
1950. 99.9 Sol3Pa : 
2025. COHN, E. J. The location of industry in the 
Pacific Northwest. (Abs.) Diss. Abs. 12:677. 1952. 
248.1 M58 
Thesis (Ph.D.) - Columbia University. 
2026. FRANK, G, Possibilities for small wood indus- 
tries in Alaska. Woodworking Digest 49(12):43-46,48, 50, 
52; 50(1):55-58, 60, 62,64,66,68,70. Dec.1947-Jan.1948. 
99.82 W87 
2027. GOLDY, D. L. ''Big"' versus "little" lumber 
operators in the Pacific Northwest. Amer. Acad. Polit. & 
Soc. Sci. Ann. 281:93-98. May 1952. 280.9 Am34 
2028. GRUENFELD, J. J. Policies and activities of 
Weyerhaeuser Timber Company, Tacoma, Washington, 
U.S.A. Oxford U. Forest Soc. J. (ser.3)1949(4):20-22. 
99.9 Ox2 
2029. HABIB, P. C. Some economic aspects of the 
California lumber industry and their relation to forest 
use. Berkeley,1952. 257 p. Ref. . 
Thesis (Ph.D.) - University of California. 
Contents: The lumber industry and the forest resource; 
The nature of the commodity; Production characteristics 
in the supply area; The structure of production; Cost 
relationships; The lumber industry and forest use. 
2030. HALL, J. A. Progress of integrated utilization 
in the Pacific Northwest. Soc. Amer. Foresters Proc. 
1947:140-149. 1948, 99.9 Sol3 
2031. HELBURN, N. Geography of the lumber indus- 
try in northwestern Montana. Madison,1950. 105 p. Ref. 
Thesis (Ph.D.) - University of Wisconsin. 
Contents: General description (including transportation); 
An introduction to the industry; Factors affecting mill 
types and locations; Conclusions. 
2032. HELBURN, N. Location types in the forest in- 
dustries of western Montana. Mont. Acad. Sci. Proc. 9: 
13-16. 1949,pub.1951. 500 M762 
Part of a study of factors controlling location and dis- 
tribution of sawmills and planing mills. 
2033. HERITAGE, C. C. The role of wood in industry. 
Timber Engin. Co. Wood Symposium Proc.:36-41. 1952. 
99.9 W85 
