jh ce ieee ee 
INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE--CONTINUED. 
2217. GARLAND, H., and ZASADA, Z. A. The in- 
creased use of aspen and forest management in the Lake 
States. Soc. Amer. Foresters Proc. 1948:69-78. Ref. 
1949, 99.9 Sol3 
2218. GARRATT, G. A. Hardwood utilization prob- 
lems in the Northeast as related to forest management. 
Soc. Amer. Foresters Proc. 1947:100-114. Ref. 1948. 
99.9 So13 
The resource and supply situation; present timber stand, 
growth and drain; local production and consumption of 
forest products; local hardwood utilization problems, in- 
cluding marketing; problems of particular species; coop- 
erative activities. 
2219. HOYLE, R. J. Eastern spruce lumber and its 
uses. Soc. Amer. Foresters. N. Y. Sect. N. Y. Forester 
9(2):8-11. May 1952. 99.9 Sol3N 
Construction use, industrial use, production and ship- 
ments, competition and prices, chiefly in New York State. 
Some Canadian information. 
2220. LEFKOF, E. A. Some specialized uses of hard 
maples Pa. Forests & Waters 1:142-143. July/Aug.1949. 
.8 P38 
2221. NASH, R. W., DUDA, E. J., and GRAY, N. H. 
Studies on extenSive dying, regeneration, and manage- 
ment of birch. Maine Forest Serv. B. 15,82 p. Ref. Aug. 
1951. 99.9 M282B 
Birch industry in Maine, p.67-71. 
2222, PADDOCK, W. R. A forest "weed" pie cherry] 
goes to.market. South. Lumberman 181(2273):195-196, 
Dec.15,1950. 99.81 S082 ; 
2223. ROE, E.1. Balsam fir in Minnesota. U.S. 
Forest Serv. Lake States Forest Expt. Sta. Misc. Rpt. 13, 
25 p. Sept.1950. 1.9622 L2M68 
Includes area, volume, consumption and utilization. 
2224. SHEPARD, H. B, Eastern white pine ..., 1-2. 
Wooden Box & Crate 14(2):19-21, 32; (3):18-20. 
Mar./Apr.-May/June 1952. 99.82 W857 
Pt. 1, Early history and use; Pt. 2, Continuing com- 
mercial value. Emphasis on availability as a container 
wood. 
2225. U.S. FOREST SERV. LAKE STATES FOREST 
EXPERIMENT STATION. Aspen reports. St. Paul,1948- 
51. 9v. 1.9622 L2L14 
Titles in this series issued since 1947 are: Rpt. 3, 
Logging methods and peeling of aspen, by T. Schantz- 
Hansen. 14 p. Ref. July 1948; 6, Aspen lumber grades 
and characteristics, by Z. A. Zasada. 9p. Ref. Sept. 
1948; 12, Dimension stock and other uses of aspen, by 
A. J. Panshin. 18 p. Ref. Jan.1950; 13, Aspen for 
veneer, by H. Garland. 10 p. Ref. May 1948; 16, Aspen 
for excelsior, by H. Garland. 10 p. Ref. June 1949; 17, 
Aspen defiberization and refining of product, by R. Craig. 
4p. Mar.1948; 19, The preservative treatment of aspen, 
by F. H. Kaufert. 19 p. Ref. May 1948; 20, Marketing 
of aspen, by Z. A. Zasada. 10 p. Ref. June 1949; 22, 
Enemies of aspen, by C. M. Christensen, R. L. Anderson, 
A. C. Hodson, and P. O. Rudolf. 16 p. Ref. Jan.1951. 
2226. *VOHDEN, A. J. Preliminary investigation of 
the utilization possibilities of hardwood thinnings. 
Petersham, 1949. 
Thesis (M.S.) - Harvard University. 
Southern States 
2227. BROWN, N. C. The Appalachian hardwoods and 
their future. Cincinnati,Appalachian Hardwood Mfrs., 
1950. 6p. 99.61 B81A 
2228. CARTER, R. M. Progress in using low quality 
hardwoods. (Abs.) Assoc. South. Agr. Workers Proc. 
48:100-101. 195i. 4 C82 
2229. DORMAN, K. W. Southern hardwoods--asset or 
liability. Forest Farmer 8(5):10,22. Feb.1949. 
99.8 F7692 
Utilization factors. Includes a map showing distribution 
of hardwood growing stock in the South. 
2230. DOSKER, C. D. Utilization of low grade hard- 
wood lumber. South. Lumberman 178(2230):59-60, 62. 
Mar.1,1949. 99.81 So82 
Also in Forest Prod. Res. Soc. Proc. 2:39-45. 1948. 
99.9 F7662P 
The manufacturer's marketing and grading problem. 
Previous treatment in South. Lumberman 176(2208):40- 
42,44,46,48. Apr.1,1948. 99.81 So82; Natl. Hardwood 
Mag. 22(3):33, 40,42, 44, 46. Apr.1948, 99.81 N212 
*Not examined. 
65 
INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE--CONTINUED. 
2231. DOSKER, C. D. Importance of hardwood utiliza- 
tion trends in southern forestry. J. Forestry 50:276-279. 
Apr.i952. 99.8 F768 
2232. FULLING, E. H. Southern yellow pines; pro- 
viders of wood products, naval stores, paper pulp and 
chemicals, these trees comprise a million dollar industry. 
Gard. J. 1:162-166. Nov./Dec.1951. 80 G1635 
2233. GARRISON, P. M. Utilization of low quality 
southern hardwoods and its effect on forest management. 
Soc. Amer. Foresters Proc. 1948:91-94. 1949. 99.9S013 
Includes discussion of improved hardwood markets, for 
staves, ties, lumber, and pulpwood. 
2234. MILLER, C. E. Low-grade hardwoods: Can the 
problem be solved? South. Lumberman 179(2249):201- 
212. Dec.15,1949. 99.81 So82 
2235. MOORE, T. F. Wanted: A new job for an old 
friend. South. Lumberman 179(2249):154-157. Dec.15, 
1949, 99.81 S082 
U.S. Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory 
studies on utilization of low-grade hickory. 
2236. PALM logs used for low-cost houses. South. 
Lumberman 178(2235):98. May 15,1949. 99.81 S082 
By C. J. Caraker, Florida. 
2237. RUSSELL, P. H. We still have chestnut. South. 
Lumberman 179(2249):236-238. Dec.15,1949. 99.81 S082 
Western States and Alaska 
2238. BAKER, W. J. Some factors involved in the 
promotion of alder-using industries in Tillamook, Oregon. 
Oreg. Forest Prod. Lab. Spec. Rpt. 1,25 p. Jan.10,1951. 
99.9 Or3522S 
Contents include: Tillamook County alder resources; 
Alder management problems; Allowable annual cut; 
Known and potential uses for alder wood; Feasible alder- 
using industries for Tillamook; Capital and equipment re- 
quirements; Employment possibilities; Market outlets; 
Information needed to evaluate the industrial advantages 
of Tillamook. 
2239. CURTIS, J. D. Aspen: the utility timber crop of 
Utah. Timberman 49(8):56-57,116. June 1948. 
99.81 T484 
With title, Aspen's place in the sun, in Amer. Forests 
54:264-265,288. June 1948. 99.8 F762 
2240. DRAKE, G, L. Utilization of low-value hard- 
woods and softwoods in the Pacific Northwest. Soc. Amer. 
Foresters Proc. 1948:94-99. 1949. 99.9 So13 
Also in West Coast Lumberman 76(3):76, 78, 80, 82. 
Mar.1949. 99.81 W52; Forest Prod. Res. Soc. Proc. 4: 
129-133. 1950. 99.9 F7662P; Pulp & Paper Mag. Canada 
52(5):157-158,161-162. Apr.1951. 302.8 P96 
2241. HUTCHISON, S. B. Comparative marketability 
of pine and mixed species in the Inland Empire. U. S. 
Forest Serv. North. Rocky Mountain Forest & Range 
Expt. Sta. Res. Note 64,5 p. June 1948. 1.9622 N3R31 
2242, LEONARD, R. O. Here's where western pine 
selects go. Calif. Lumber Merchant 28(22):54,56. May 
15,1950. 99.81 C12 
2243. LEUSCHEL, O. H. The past, present and future 
of Inland Empire associated species. Nowest. Wood 
Prod. Clinic. Proc. 5:1-3. 1950. 99.9 Sp6 
2244, MAHAFFAY, R. E. Timber Cinderella [lodge- 
pole pine]. Amer. Forests 54(1):24-25,43. Jan.1948. 
99.8 F76 
2245. ROBINSON, D. D. Utilization of Oregon hard- 
woods. Oreg. Forest Prod. Lab. Inform. C. 2,22 p. Jan. 
1948. 99.9 Or35221 
Contents: The hardwood resource; Logging practices; 
Lumber manufacture and marketing; Future development 
of the hardwood industry. 
2246. ROE, A. L., and BOE, K.N. Ponderosa pine 
bibliography. U.S. Forest Serv. North. Rocky Mountain 
Forest & Range Expt. Sta. Sta. Paper 22,74 p. Ref. Mar. 
1950. 1.9622 N3St1l 
Includes references on economic aspects. 
2247. SCHOFIELD, W. R. Utilization of secondary 
species. West. Forestry & Conserv. Assoc. Proc. 39:43- 
44, 1948. 99.9 W522 
Also in Brit. Columbia Lumberman 33(1):56-57, 66. 
Jan.1949, 99.81 B77 
2248. SMITH, H. H. Utilization of western hardwoods. 
Forest Prod. Res. Soc. J. 2(3):52-54. Sept.1952. 
99.9 F7662J 
