INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE--CONTINUED. 
2603. BRATTON, A. W. Hardwood log grading and 
lumber value. U.S. Forest Serv. Noeast. Forest Expt. 
Sta. Sta. Paper 14,6 p. May 1948. 1.9622 N2St22 
Also in Wood [Chicago] 3(8):18-19. Aug.1948. 
99.82 W859 
Based on experience at Otsego Forest Products Coop- 
erative Association. 
2604. BROWN, M. D. A study of time-value relation- 
ships in a southern Michigan band mill. East Lansing, 
1949. 60 p. 
Thesis (M.S.) - Michigan State College. 
Factors affecting lumber values; The marginal log; Log 
scaling rules; Log grades. 
2605. BRUCE, D. Use of photos in log studies. Tim- 
berman 51(6):40-42,44. Apr.1950. 99.81 T484 
Photographs follow graded peeler and sawlogs through 
the sawing operation, showing recovery grades and 
amounts and variations within log grades. 
2606. CAMPBELL, R. A. Estimating your logging and 
milling costs. South. Lumberman 176(2209):50,52,54, 56, 
Apr.15,1948. 99.81 S082 
U. S. Forest Service studies. 
2607. CARPENTER, R. D. Size of pine logs cut in 
Arkansas, Louisiana mills. U.S. Forest Serv. South. 
Forest Expt. Sta. South. Forestry Notes 66:3. Mar.1950. 
1.9 F7624S 
2608. *COE, H. H. Production time analysis of small 
sawmills in southern New England. New Haven, Conn., 
1948. 
Thesis (M.F.) - Yale University. 
2609. DARWIN, W.N., and THURMOND, A. K. Buy 
the right sawlogs. Wood Combined Wood Prod. 56(8):32, 
56-57. Aug.1951. 99.82 W856 
A mill study of log value and lumber recovery, for red 
oak, conducted by the U. S. Tennessee Valley Authority 
Division of Forestry Relations. : 
2610. DARWIN, W.N., and COBB, B. C. Effect of log 
size and grade on production rate and lumber grade in 
shortleaf pine. Norris ?,U.S. Tenn. Val. Authority Dept. 
Forestry Relat.,1949. 7p. 173.2 T25Ef 
Results of a mill study in northwest Georgia. 
2611. DARWIN, W. N., and THURMOND, A. K. How to 
figure sawmill costs. Wood [Chicago] 6(6):21,36,38. June 
1951. 99.82 W859 
Studies made in 58 circular sawmills by U. S. Tennessee 
Valley Authority Division of Forestry Relations. 
2612. *DAVIS, A. A. The influence and control of 
small sawmills in eastern hardwood forests. New Haven, 
1948. 
Thesis (M.F.) - Yale University. 
2613. DAVIS, E. M. Lumber recovery from ''woods 
waste" logs. Iowa State Col. J. Sci. 22:341-348. July 
1948. 470 Io9 
U. S. Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory, 
cooperating. 
Recovery from Douglas-fir logs salvaged in the Pacific 
Northwest, indicating that milling of some of the waste 
could be profitable. 
2614. DAVIS, E. M., and MILLER, R. H. P. Some 
factors affecting the manufacture of white fir lumber in 
the California pine region. West Coast Lumberman 75(4): 
115-116,118. Apr.1948. 99.81 W52 
Includes analysis of efficient sawmill practices. 
2615. FAUCHEUX, W. A. Quality-control production 
in selected [Sawmill] operations in the Florida parishes 
of Louisiana. Baton Rouge,1952. 
Thesis (M.F.) - Louisiana State University. 
2616. FECHNER, G. H. Yellowpoplar lumber grade 
yield recovery—a guide to improved cutting practices. J. 
Forestry 49:888-894. Ref. Dec.1951. 99.8 F768 
Information from cooperative mill studies in the Tennes 
see Valley, U. S. Tennessee Valley Authority, U. S. Forest 
Service Southern Forest Experiment Station, National 
Hardwood Lumber Association, and Southern Pine Inspec- 
tion Bureau, cooperating. 
2617. FRAMPTON, D. B. Wood utilization at Mc- 
Arthur. Amer. Wood-Preserv. Assoc. Proc. 46:261-266. 
1950. 300.9 Am3 
Problems of log utilization and waste. 
2618. GEVORKIANTZ, S.R. For more and better oak 
ties. Lake States Timber Digest 3(9):3-4. Feb.10,1949. 
99.81 L14 
Also in Cross Tie B, 29(12):18-20,22. Dec.1948. 
99.82 C87 
*Not examined. 
78 
INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE--CONTINUED. 
Study by U. S. Forest Service Lake States Forest Ex- 
periment Station reveals effects of site quality on lumber 
and tie outturn. Discusses relative productivity of sawing 
for ties or lumber. 
2619. GRANTHAM, J. B. Quality control in sawmill 
operations as practiced in class "A" Douglas fir mills. 
Forest Prod. Res. Soc. Proc. 4:149-161. 1950. 
99.9 F7662P 
2620. GREGORY, G. R., and PERSON, H. L. Lumber 
values for east Texas pine logs. U.S. Forest Serv. South. 
Forest Expt. Sta. Occas. Paper 113,31 p. Ref. Mar.1949. 
1.9 F76240 
J. E. Stone Lumber Co. of Nacogdoches cooperated in 
this mill study. Includes log grades, lumber recovery, 
costs of production, and time studies. 
2621. HARTMAN, G. B., and KELLOGG, L. F. Pre- 
liminary report of yields of lumber by grades from Iowa 
timbers. U.S. Forest Serv. Cent. States Forest Expt. 
Sta. Sta. Notes 43,2 p. May 1948. 1.9 F76252S 
2622. HAWES, R. B. Time and cost analysis of a 
portable sawmill in the Piedmont region of North 
Carolina. Durham,1951. 58 p. 
Thesis (M.F.) - Duke University. 
2623. HERRICK, A. M. Accuracy in estimating over- 
run. South. Lumberman 177(2215):57-58. July 15,1948. 
99.81 So82 
Based on the author's studies in grading and tallying 
Indiana hardwood sawlogs. 
2624. HOLT, L. Cutting costs in relation to tree size. 
Pulp & Paper Res. Inst. Canada, Woodlands Res. Index 
56(F-2),5 p. Apr.1949. 99.8 W855A 
A cost analysis following up W. M. Robertson's Partial 
Bane pays, issued as Woodlands Research Index. 48 
2625. *HUNT, E. V. Sawmilling cost as affected by 
species, log size and defect in Central Missouri. 
Columbia, Mo.,1952. 51 p. ; 
Thesis (M.S.) - University of Missouri. 
2626. KRAMER, P. R., and LEAR, W. L. Logs and 
lumber; the relation between hardwood log size and the 
size of lumber produced by circular mills. South. Lum- 
berman 185(2321):192-195. Dec.15,1952. 99.81 So82 
Texas Forest Service, U. S. Forest Service Southern 
Forest Experiment Station, and Crossett Lumber Co., 
cooperating. 
2627. LANDENBERGER,.C. J. Utilization practices 
of selected lumber companies manufacturing ponderosa 
pine in Idaho and Washington. Fort Collins,1949. 103 p. 
Ref. 
Thesis (M.F.) - Colorado Agricultural and Mechanical 
College. 
Cost and efficiency comparisons, p. 77-96. 
2628. LARRABEE, D. R. An investigation of sawing 
time and cost at a portable sawmill in North Carolina. 
Durham,1951. 29 p. 
Thesis (M.F.) - Duke University 
2629. LEE, J. E. A time and yield study of gang saw- 
ing pine logs and cants. Durham,1952. 43 p. 
Thesis (M.F.) - Duke University. 
Dargan Lumber Manufacturing Co., cooperating. 
2630. LEWIS, S. B. Lost time relative to [sawmill 
production. Timberman 54(1):80. Nov.1952. 99.81 T4384 
2631. LIGHTSEY, O. Controlling quality of lumber 
manufacture. South. Lumberman 178(2229):60, 62. 
Feb.15,1949, 99.81 S082 
2632. MCBRIDE, C. F. Circular mills vs. gang mills. 
Wood [Chicago] 4(5):22-23,43-45. May 1949. 99.82 W859 
Mill studies in British Columbia to determine labor 
costs, overrun, recovery in relation to log grade, and 
lumber grade recovery. 
2633. MCBRIDE, C. F. Lumber recovery from 
Douglas fir in British Columbia. Brit. Columbia Lum- 
berman 33(6):56-58,162,164,166. June 1949. 99.81 B77 
Similar title in Forest Prod. Res. Soc. Proc. 3:284-291. 
1949. 99.9 F7662P; Timber Canada 10(11):25-29,57-61. 
July 1950. 99.81 T487 
2634. MCBRIDE, C. F. Lumber recovery from 
second-growth western hemlock. Brit. Columbia Lum- 
berman 35(6):63,140,142. June 1951. 99.81 B77 
Mill study of grades and recovery, conducted by the 
Canada Forest Products Laboratory in Vancouver. 
*Not examined. 
