INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE--CONTINUED. 
2635. MCCOY, E. W. An analytical comparison of 
grade yields and overrun in Indiana hardwood sawlogs. 
Lafayette,1952. 53 p. Ref. 
Thesis (M.S.) - Purdue University. 
Holmes & Co., cooperating. 
Expansion of the earlier grade yield and overrun study 
by A. M. Herrick in 1946. 
2636. MCKIMMY, M. D. An analysis of head-sawing 
operations at representative large fir sawmills. 
Corvallis,1951. 87 p. 
Thesis (M.S.) - Oregon State College. 
Abstract in J. Forestry 49:412. June 1951. 99.8 F768 
Time and efficiency study, 13 sawmills. 
2637, MARLIN, C. B. A study of portable sawmill 
operations in the Piedmont region of North Carolina and 
the possibility of their use by a farmers' cooperative. 
Durham,1949. 91 p. Ref. 
Thesis (M.F.) - Duke University. 
2638. MATSON, E. E., and RAPRAEGER, H. A. Fall 
Creek second-growth Douglas-fir thinning study. U.S. 
Forest Serv. Pacific Nowest. Forest & Range Expt. Sta. 
Res. Note 90,13 p. Nov.1950. 1.9 F7629Fr 
' A marking, logging, and milling analysis. Includes 
sawing time study, lumber grade recovery, and produc- 
tion costs and returns. 
2639. MATSON, E. E. Lumber grade recovery from 
Oregon coast-type Douglas-fir. U.S. Forest Serv. 
Pacific Nowest. Forest & Range Expt. Sta. Res. Paper 3, 
10 p. June 1952. 1.9622 P2R31 
Cooperative mill study which includes a time analysis, 
and recovery statistics by peeler and sawlog grades. 
2640. MATSON, E, E, Lumber grade recovery from 
southern interior Oregon type Douglas fir. Timberman 
49(6):50,52,54,56,58,60,62. Apr.1948. 99.81 T484 
U. S. Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and 
Range Experiment Station and private industry, cooperat- 
ing. 
2641. MATSON, E. E. Lumber grades from Douglas- 
fir peeler logs. U.S. Forest Serv. Pacific Nowest. 
Forest & Range Expt. Sta. Forest Res. Note 83,5 p. 
Nov.1952,. 1.9 F7629Fr 
2642. MATSON, E. E. Lumber grades from young- 
growth Douglas-fir. U.S. Forest Serv. Pacific Nowest. 
Forest & Range Expt. Sta. Res. Note 79,2 p. Sept.1952. 
1.9 F7629Fr 
Indicates the economic feasibility of silvicultural 
practices which will improve the quality of young-growth 
Douglas-fir. 
2643. MATSON, E. E. Recovery from lower grades 
of Douglas fir logs. Timberman 54(2):106-107. Dec. 
1952. 99.81 T484 
Mill studies conducted by U. S. Forest Service, Pacific 
Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 
2644. MATSON, E. E. Second-growth Douglas fir 
lumber. Forest Prod. Res. Soc. J. 1(1):87-90. Sept.1951. 
99.9 F7662J 
Chiefly quality and recovery aspects. 
2645. MOLPUS, R. H. Control of mill operating 
costs should begin at the stump. South. Lumber J. 53:98, 
100. Jan.10,1949, 99.81 So8 
2646. NELSON, L. A. Lumber grades and sizes from 
No. 3 west coast hemlock logs. Timberman 51(7):112, 
114-115. May 1950. 99.81 T484 
2647. POST, D. Cost analysis of milling southern 
pine on a portable mill in relation to diameter classes, 
in Alachua County, Florida, year 1951. Gainesville,1951. 
27 p. Ref. 
Thesis (M.S.F.) - University of Florida. 
Time studies of milling operations. 
2648. QUIGLEY, K. L. Lumber production rate from 
various-sized logs at Missouri Ozark sawmills. U.S, 
Forest Serv. Cent. States Forest Expt. Sta. Sta. Notes 55, 
2p. July 1949, 1.9 F76252S 
2649. REYNOLDS, R. R. Lumber grade yield from 
band vs. gang mills. U.S. Forest Serv. South. Forest 
Expt. Sta. South. Forestry Notes 77:2-3. Jan.1952. 
1.9 F7624S 
Crossett Lumber Co. mill study on recovery from 448 
logs of 3 different grades. 
2650. ROTHSTEIN, M. M. Compares costs with OPA 
days. Timberman 49(8):96. June 1948, 99.81 T484 
Costs of producing green dressed lumber, Pacific 
Northwest. 
2551. SCHMIDT, H. Size tolerance in lumber manu- 
facture. Nowest. Wood Prod. Clinic Proc. 6:10-19. 1951. 
99.9 Sp6 
Includes price differentials based on thickness, anda 
discussion of overrun in sawmill economy. 
79 
INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE--CONTINUED. 
2652. SCHRADER, O, H. Biles-Coleman Lumber 
Company, an outstanding example of good forest utiliza- 
tion. Wash. Inst. Forest Prod. New Wood-Use Ser. C. 1, 
4p. Sept.1949. 99.9 W278N 
Includes time and efficiency of mill operations, one of 
which utilizes lodgepole pine. 
2653. STECHNER, D. A. The application of statistical 
quality coatrol techniques to small sawmill operations. 
Raleigh,1951, 48 p. Ref. 
Thesis (M.F.) - North Carolina State College. 
2654. TELFORD, C. J. Effects of taper sawing and 
log turning. Forest Prod. Res. Soc. J. 1(1):36-38. Sept. 
1951. 99.9 F7662J 
Also in Nowest. Wood Prod. Clinic Proc. 6:19-24. 1951. 
99.9 Sp6 
Includes recovery tables by grades for white pine and 
ponderosa pine in the Inland Empire. Relates sawing 
techniques to time studies and quality production, using 
information taken chiefly from M. Bradner's Sawmill 
efficiency not measured by volume of production. Tim- 
berman 28(8):37-40; (9):40-44; (10):42-46. June-Aug. 
1927. 99.81 T484 
2655. THOMAS, D. P. The small sawmill in the 
State's forest economy. Wash. State Forestry Conf. 
Annu. Mtg. 31:34-43. 1952. 99.9 W276 
A Tufts Lumber Company logging and milling study, 
analyzing costs and productivity of various operations. 
2656. TOOLE, A. W., and DANIELSON, C. W. The 
utility of No. 3 Common northern hardwood lumber for 
mechanized processing into glued products. Forest Prod. 
Res. Scc. Proc. 3:94-103. 1949, 99.9 F7662P 
A recovery and cost study with a view toward creating 
markets for low-grade stock. 
2657. WORTHINGTON, N. P. Lumber grade recovery 
and milling costs, from second growth Douglas fir of 
central western Washington. Timberman 50(11):58,60,62, 
64,66. Sept.1949. 99.81 T484 
U. S. Forest Service Pacific Northwest Forest and 
Range Experiment Station, U. S. Forest Service Divisions 
of State and Private Forestry, and of Timber Manage- 
ment, West Coast Lumbermen's Association, and mill 
owners, cooperating. 
Includes log grade and value recovery. 
2658. WYLIE, A. E. Maple dimension study. Wood 
[Chicago] 6(5):19,34,37. May 1951. 99.82 W859 
Yield and recovery study made at Gamble Bros., 
Louisville, Ky. 
Grading and Scaling 
2659, ALLEN, J. W. No. 3 Douglas fir peeler logs. 
Wash. Inst. Forest Prod. New Wood-Use Ser. C. 18,4 p. 
Nov.1951. 99.9 W278N 
Instruction to assist logger to recognize logs of high 
salvage value. 
2660. BLYTHE, R. H. The economics of sample size 
applied to the scaling of sawlogs. Biometrics B. 1:67-70. 
Oct.1945, 442.8 B5224 
2661. BRIEGLEB, P. A. The yield of Douglas-fir in 
the Pacific Northwest by International i/4-inch kerf log 
rule. U.S. Forest Serv. Pacific Nowest. Forest & Range 
Expt. Sta. Res. Note 46,4 p. Dec.16,1948, 1.9 F7629Fr 
Adjustment and comparison of volumes formerly 
tabulated by the Scribner rule. Discusses the relation of 
the International scale to lumber tally. 
2662. BROWN, H. L. Time to look at Rules No. 14. 
South. Lumberman 177(2215):54,56. July 15,1948. 
99.81 So82 
Quality considerations behind new West Coast Bureau of 
Lumber Grades and Inspection rule. 
2663. BROWN, N. C. North American grading rules. 
Wood [London] 17:428-430. Nov.1952. 99.82 W855 
Interpretation of lumber grading rules, with some 
discussion of economic applications. 
2664. CAMPBELL, R. A. Tree grades, yields and 
values for some Appalachian hardwoods. U.S. Forest 
Serv. Soeast Forest Expt. Sta. Sta. Paper 9,25 p. July 
1951. 1.9622 S4St2 
2665. CREIGHTON, J. W.,STUMP, W. G., and 
HUTCHINS, W. F. Correlation of walnut furniture cut- 
ting requirements with grade yield. Mich. Agr. Expt. Sta. 
Q. B. 35:230-247. Nov.1952. 100 M585 
Baker Furniture Company, cooperating. 
2666. DOVERSPIKE, G, E., and CAMP, H. W. Four 
test-demonstrations of hardwood log grades in the 
Northeast. U.S. Forest Serv. Noeast. Forest Expt. Sta. 
Sta. Paper 42,19 p. May 1951. 1.9622 N2st22 
Mills in Pennsylvania, West Virginia,and Maine. 
