INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE--CONTINUED. 
2667. FOREST PRODUCTS RESEARCH CLINIC. 
Problem No. 2: Is there any standard system for apprais- 
ing quality of hardwood logs? If so, how does it function? 
South. Lumberman 181(2272):35. Dec.1,1950. 99.81 S082 
C. R. Lockard outlines requirements of grading systems 
in a paper delivered before the Forest Products Research 
Society, Northeast Region Section meeting. 
2668. GIRARD, J. W. Noted forester tells of nation- 
wide work [log-grading in the standing tree; Pacific 
Logging Cong. Loggers Handb. 8:67-76. 1948. 
99.76 P112La 
Beginnings of log grading in the Pacific Northwest, 
practices throughout the United States, and the author's 
grading techniques. Includes his grades for aircraft 
quality Sitka spruce logs. 
2669. HARDWOOD log grades for standard lumber— 
proposed methods and results. (Results of studies on 
northern, central, and southern hardwoods.) U.S. Forest 
Serv. Forest Prod. Lab. D1737,55 p. Mar.1949. 
1.9 F761R 
By A. C. Wollin and C, L. Vaughan, under the direction 
of R. H. P. Miller and C. V. Sweet. 
Pocket ed. on applying grading systems, 16 p., is 
D1737-A. 
2670. HERRICK, A. M. How to grade hardwood saw- 
logs. Purdue U. Agr. Ext. B. 346,7 p. 1949. 275.29 In2E 
2671. KRAMER, P. R. Log grade classification based 
on standard lumber recovery for inferior upland hard- 
woods in east Texas. Tex. Forest Serv. Tech. Rpt. 4, 
34 p. Mar.1952. 99.9 T31T 
Condensed with title,Lumber yields from low-grade 
logs, in South. Lumberman 185(2311):40. July 15,1952. 
99.81 So82 
U. S. Forest Service, cooperating. 
Partial contents: Principles of hardwood log grading; 
Development of study log grades; Index values by species 
and log grade; Lumber yield of upland hardwood logs; 
Application of log grades. 
2672. LANE, P. H., and FECHNER, G. H. Log grad- 
ing for sawmill operators. Cross Tie B. 33(2):7-10,12, 
14,16,18,20. Ref. Feb.1952. 99.82 C87 
Study originating with the U. S. Tennessee Valley 
Authority Division of Forestry Relations, and various 
cooperating agencies, conducting mill studies in the 
Tennessee Valley. 
Contents: Grading hardwood logs; Factory lumber logs; 
Structural logs; Local use logs; Other kinds of logs; 
Comparisons of grade recovery from factory and tie logs. 
2673. LOCKARD, C. R. Hardwood log grade tests. 
U. S. Forest Serv. South. Forest Expt. Sta. South. 
Forestry Notes 55:3. May 1948. 1.9 F7624S 
The station's interim log grades are tested at Vicksburg 
and Knoxville. 
2674. LOCKARD, C. R. Hardwood log-grading—a 
phase of quality control. Forest Prod. Res. Soc. Proc. 4: 
61-69. 1950. 99.9 F7662P 
Also in South. Lumberman 182(2279):84, 86, 88,90. 
Mar.15,1951. 99.81 S082 
2675. LOCKARD, C. R., and CARPENTER, R. D. 
Interim sawlog grades for southern hardwoods. Rev. 
New Orleans,U. S. Forest Sery.South. Forest Expt. Sta., 
1948. 9p. 1.9622 S2In8 
Report for the U. S. Forest Service Committee on 
Interim Hardwood Sawlog Grades for the South. 
2676. LOCKARD, C. R., PUTNAM, J. A., and 
CARPENTER, R. D. Log defects in southern hardwoods. 
U.S. D. A. Agr. Handb. 4,37 p. June 1950. 1 Ag84Ah 
U. S. Forest Service Southern Forest Experiment 
Station study. Relates defects to utilization and grade. 
2677. LOCKARD, C. R. Log grading problems. 
Wood [Chicago] 6(3):24,38,40,42,45. Mar.1951. 
99.82 W859 
2678. LOEHR, R. C. Softwood lumber grading. 
South. Lumberman 180(2258):50,52; (2259):48,50; (2260): 
50,52. Ref. May 1-June 1,1950. 99.81 S082 
An historical survey. 
2679, LONGWOOD, F. R. Log grade recovery ona 
selection cutting in northern hardwoods of Upper Michi- 
gan. U.S. Forest Serv. Lake States Forest Expt. Sta. 
Tech. Note 335,1 p. Apr.1950. 1.9 F7625T 
2680. MCBRIDE, C. F. The effect of ambrosia 
beetle damage upon lumber value. Brit. Columbia 
Lumberman 34(9):46-48,122,124,126,128. Sept.1950. 
99.81 B77 
Includes log grades, prices, and lumber recovery. 
80 
INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE--CONTINUED. 
2681. MATTHEWS, D. M. Use of Doyle log scale in 
Ontario. Pulp & Paper Mag. Canada 48(13):114,116,118; 
49(1):119-120,122. Dec.1947-Jan.1948. 302.8 P96 
Also issued as Ontario Dept. Lands & Forests, Tech. 
C. 161, June 1947.* 
Affect of Doyle rule on stumpage prices, logs and 
cordwood, and on Crown dues assessments. Calculates 
corrections and gives scaling instructions. 
2682. MULLER, J. L. The standardization of hard- 
wood lumber grades. South. Lumberman 185(2321):112- 
113. Dec.15,1952. 99.81 So82 
2683. NATIONAL HARDWOOD LUMBER ASSOCIA- 
TION. Lumber grade utilization. South. Lumberman 183 
(2297):245. Dec.15,1951. 99.81 S082 
Quality hardwood dimension yield from cuttings of 
various lumber grades. 
2684. PARKS, W. H. Formation of quality classes for 
second-growth Douglas-fir logs based on lumber grade 
recovery. Corvallis,1952. 47 p. Ref. 
Thesis (M.S.) - Oregon State College. 
Abstract in J. Forestry 50:868-869. Nov.1952. 
99.8 F768 
Based on mill studies in two small mills. 
2685. PERSON, H. L., and KRAMER, P. R. The 
classification of low-grade logs and trees in upland hard- 
wood management. (Abs.) Assoc. South. Agr. Workers. 
Proc. 48:99-100. 1951. 4 C82 
U. S. Forest Service Southern Forest Experiment 
Station and Texas Forest Service, cooperating. 
2686. POGUE, R. Effect of woods burning on lumber 
grade recovery. J. Forestry 46:689-690. Sept.1948. 
99.8 F768 
2687. POWER, L. G. Lumber grading. Canada Lum- 
berman 72(12):38-39,93-94. Dec.1952. 99.81 C16 
Desirability of standardizing Canadian spruce grades 
for marketing; discusses the four kinds of grading rules 
current in eastern Canada: Maritime Bureau grading 
rules, Ontario grading rules, Quebec, and the North- — 
eastern Lumber Association grading rules. 
2688. PRICE, A. W., and HOYLE, R. J. Hardwood 
lumber inspection. N. Y. State Col. Forestry Tech. P. 
70,48 p. Oct.1948. 99.9 N486B 
A supplement to the National Hardwood Lumber 
Association rules book, with explanations of economic 
considerations behind grading and inspection. 
2689. RAPRAEGER, E. F. The cubic foot as a 
national log-scaling standard. U.S. Forest Serv. North. 
Rocky Mountain Forest & Range Expt. Sta. Sta. Paper 24, 
25 p. Ref. June 1950. 1.9622 N3Stl 
Includes general economic implications of the cubic- 
foot and board-foot log scales. 
2690. SCHNUR, G. L., and LANE, R. D. Log rule 
comparison, International 1/4-inch, Doyle, and Scribner. 
U. S. Forest Serv. Cent. States Forest Expt. Sta. Sta. 
Notes 47,6 p. Oct.1,1948. 1.9 F762525 
Includes conversion of dollar values per unit volume. 
2691. SMITH, L. W. Lumber grading. Wood [Chicago] 
2(10):20-21,40. Oct.1947. 99.82 W859 
The reasons behind grading rules developed for hard- 
woods and softwoods in the United States. 
2692. STERMITZ, R. E. The relationship between log 
characteristics and lumber grade recovery from second- 
growth Douglas fir. Corvallis,1951. 41 p. Ref. 
Thesis (M.F.) - Oregon State College. 
Log classes established as a result of mill studies. 
2693. SWEET, C. V., and FOBES, E. W. New log 
studies to aid graders. Wood [Chicago] 6(5):22-23. May 
1951. 99.82 W859 
U. S. Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory, 
Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, 
and private industry, cooperating. 
2694. U.S. FOREST SERV. How lumber is graded. 
Washington,1949. 13 p. 1.962 A2H835 
Also lists principal commercial grading associations 
and bureaus. 
2695. U. S. FOREST SERV. NORTHEASTERN 
FOREST EXPERIMENT STATION. The grading of logs 
and trees; a bibliography compiled for the Log Grade 
Committee, U. S. Forest Service, by F. J. Flick. Upper 
Darby,1952. 16 p. 1.9622 N2G75 
2696. U. S. FOREST SERV. SOUTHEASTERN FOREST 
EXPERIMENT STATION. CENTRAL COASTAL PLAIN 
BR. Tree grades for loblolly and shortleaf pine. U.S. 
Forest Serv. Soeast. Forest Expt. Sta. Tech. Note 69, 
13 p. Ref. Aug.1948. 1.9 F7623T 
*Not examined. 
