168 ZOOLOGISCHE MEDEDEELINGEN — DEEL HI. 
longitudinal row of small granules along the upper margin of the finger 
is distinctly represented. The small differences between the two females 
of very different size, though perhaps largely due to age, may be ascribed 
to a constant or merely individual variation, but I prefer to refer both 
the specimens to the present species. 
It is a curious fact, that only females of this species have been exa- 
mined ; probably in the males the characters are much more pronounced '). 
The Museum specimen in still slightly larger than de Man’s co-type 
(RBST: Dimensions: 
Distance between external orbital angles 
5 5 epibranchial teeth . 
Breadth of carapace above base of penultimate pair of ica 
Length of carapace in the median line . 
Breadth of front. 
Posterior margin of carapace 
Horizontal length of palm 
Height of palm . 
Length of mobile finger . 
Length of meropodite 
Breadth of meropodite of penultimate 
Length of carpo- + propodite{ pair of legs 
Length of dactylus | 
62. Sesarma (Sesarma s.s.) lanata Alcock. 
1900. Sesarma lanatum Alcock. Journ. As. Soc. Bengal, v. 
418 — Bombay and Karachi. 
1903. Sesarma lanatum Alcock et Me Ardle. Ill. Zool. 
Crust. prt. 10, pl. 65 f. 4—4a — no locality. 
63. Sesarma (Holometopus) latifemur Alcock. 
39.5 mm. 
IR fy 
nt ee 
36.06.15 
ARE 
18.5 
10 "3° 
18:85:70 
1755 
FEROS 
EMT 
à 1 i SUR 
13.2 4 
69 prt. 2 p. 
id 29 
„Investigator”’, 
1900. Sesarma latifemur Alcock. Journ. As. Soc. Bengal, v. 69 prt. 2 
p. 421 — Andamans. 
1903. Sesarma latifemur Alcock et Me Ardle. IL. Zool. 
Crust. prt. 10, pl. 66 f. 2 — no locality. 
64. Sesarma (Parasesarma) lenzii de Man. 
2 22 
,Investigator”, 
1889. Sesarma melissa? de Man. Zool. Jahrb. Syst. Bd. 4 p. 434 — 
Fiji Isles. 
1) As to specimens presumed to be the of this species, see Sesarma taeniolata crebrestriata). 
