114 MISC. PUBLICATION 218, U. S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE 
TABLE 23.—Summary of assessment ratio data by property classes, 1926; selected 
townships, Minnesota—Continued 
RESORT AND TOTAL 
| Resort 2 All classes 
County and township As- Ap- |Assess- As- Ap-_ |Assess- 
Area | sessed | praised | ment | Area | sessed | praised | ment 
value | value | ratio value | value | ratio 
Dol- Per- Per- 
Beltrami: Acres lars | Dollars | cent | Acres | Dollars| Dollars | cent 
IN CKLGS! Se Lo eee. Reena leerien oil am 109, 1,541 1, 034) (4) 20, 723} 206, 942) 223, 828 92 
Mrohn hee eee aes ee ee 1,049 14,341! 19,815 72) 20, 066) 332,804) 386, 511 86 
Eka galig(pant) sae 832) 12,030} 11, 304 106} 6,478} 90,410) 77,886 116 
Hubbard: | 
© aye Es Pee Be ce eee tl 1, 959) 32,360! 22,079 147! 21, 049} 319,197) 129, 027 247 
Crowa\Wing Wake wes see 2, 857) 52,329] 49, 241 106) 19, 487} 396, 592} 301, 786 131 
IN Gy Dianne os ee es 4, 257/101, 112} 120, 703 84| 17, 182) 315, 484) 271, 738 116 
‘, pecocleraty pee eA EC A SY) es 0) 0 (I) ee ae ee 18, 973} 264,626! 97,358 272 
ake: 
T.59N., R.& W. (in Beaver Bay) -__-- 363) 1, 635 1,341) (4) 17, 182} 169,419} 185,136 92 
AM ESR IN ES 1R8 (3 \iVig (Ghat Cinnaaep) a8 oe 0) 0 QO} 22S 2021-270) L485 28715 1628932, 236 
T.54N., R.10 W. (in Silver Creek) __ 0 0 (1) ee 23, 019} 205, 048) 204, 056 100 
St. Louis: 
IRsMDAaTRASS 2s sees eee ee ee 0 0 Qjzssse53 20, 715} 115, 163) 322, 461 36 
POO lASE es et eet Sa Sea 0) 0 OS 41, 424) 372, 285} 373, 563 100 
Hee HANA ED ONE arte la Wie eee ne 281) 2,742 1,140) (4) 42, 431] 261, 290) 132, 745 197 
1 Sources of data: Areas and assessed values (assessors’ ‘‘full and true’ values) from township assess- 
ment rolls of 1926. Appraised values by members of the staff, using methods which are explained in the 
text. Assessment ratios computed from assessed and appraised values. 
2 Improvement values are included under cut over and resort. ‘Those under cut over are negligible in 
amount. 
3 Based only on those areas which were examined, representing 31 percent of the entire area of the town- 
ship and 34 percent of the total assessed value. 
4 Areas under 500 acres and improvement values totaling less than $2,500 are not considered sufficient 
samples to warrant computing assessment ratios. 
