116 MISC. PUBLICATION 218, U. 8. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE 
TaBLE 25.—Summary of assessment ratio data by predominant cover, 1926; selected 
towns, Wisconsin } 
Timber Cut-over Cleared land 
Town As- Di Ga As- D- ne As- | Ap- mae 
Area | sessed | praised nts Area | sessed | praised aang Area |sessed|praised aa 
value} value Pare value | value ae value} value ratio 
ef ee EE | |  — || | | | | "=" 
Acres| Dol. Dol. Pct. |Acres| Dol. | Dol. | Pct. |Acres; Dol. | Dol. | Pet. 
Athelstane_____-.___ 196} 1, 440 2,160) (2) |49, 367/289, 160/290, 740 99) 4, 200/26, 870} 93, 010 29 
Bartelnres ae see 3, 120/106, 800} 173, 270 62) 9, 804/108, 485} 77, 220 140 786|11, 500} 26, 270 44 
Bayiviecweees eae 53 200 550! (2) 117, 880/153, 850/123, 810 124 793)22, 179) 27, 810 80 
Henrietta__.__.--__-- 280) 5, 210 4, 820} (?) 1, 132) 22, 909) 19, 830 116} 1, 823/51, 180) 80, 940) 63 
Taonga eee 24, 976/366, 995}1, 572, 860 23/25, 971] 92, 774)230, 068 40| 1, 669/11, 844) 68, 980 17 
Little Rice_________- 405| 2, 335 6, 150; (2) |27, 678/135, 869)168, 500 81 706' 4, 765} 14, 880 32 
Morse (nonmineral 
DAL) yee es aay 5, 522)134, 010) 160, 930 83/37, 530)450, 405)462, 250 97| 1, 263/27, 000) 34, 080 79 
ING UB bi aNe oN a 2,918) 90, 285 (3) (3) 22, 496}294, 165) 182, 830 161) 1, 301/31, 165) 46, 650 67 
Three Lakes_-_-_---- 3, 806} 58, 175 90, 690 64/22, 952/162, 675)230, 270 71] 2, 290/64, 035)113, 620 56 
1 Sources of data: Areas and assessed values from town assessment rolls of 1926. Appraised values by 
members of the staff, using methods which are explained in the text. Assessment ratios computed from 
assessed and appraised values. 
2 Areas under 500 acres are not considered sufficient samples to warrant computing assessment ratios. 
3 Timber was not appraised in Murry. 
TABLE 26.—Summary of assessment ratio data by property classes, 1928; selected 
towns, New Hampshire } 
Forest Farm 
| oS | 
Town and ps | ares As- 
: As- IO _| cient i As- Ap- i 
ownership E TOD: Area | sessed | praised Been of Eee Area | sessed | praised | ae 
URES value | value aa dis- value | value ! : 
atio per- ratio 
sion 
Num- Dol- Per-| Per- | Num- Dol- Per 
Fremont: ber |Acres| lars | Dollars| cent | cent ber |Acres| lars | Dollars| cent 
Resident_____-- 84| 2,972) 72, 515) 94, 039 77 25 68} 2, 804! 89, 340} 138, 513 64 
Nonresident--__- 120} 3, 370} 71, 940) 141, 145 51 37 12 786} 22, 255} 32, 965 68 
Totals: 22. 204] 6, 342/144, 455| 235,184 61} 38] 80/3, 5901111, 595! 171,478) 65 
Loudon as ar 
Resident______- 23] 1, 164} 19, 250) 19, 276 100 Saves 222)17, 744/367, 750) 491, 960 75 
Nonresident_-_-_- 78| 4, 483] 65, 413] 71, 850 Ol eee 36) 2, 383] 42, 585} 48, 440 88 
Totale2 22. 101) 5, 647| 84, 663' 91, 126 QB es Nu eat 127/410, 335) 540, 400 76 
Richmond: TE 
Resident _-__-__- 73| 4, 176) 72,650) 89, 087 82 26 58} 2, 714} 53,910} 77, 453 7 
Nonresident--_- 200)15, 228/210, 380} 295, 397 71 34! | 13 597) 11,150) 13, 437 &3 
Motalvs. 273/19, 404/283, 030} 384, 484 74 32 71| 3, 311] 65, 060} 90, 890 72 
Other All classes 
Fremont: 
Resident_____-_- 2 82 268] 79, 955} 125, 300 64 18 234| 6, 044/241, 810) 357, 852 68 
Nonresident_-_-_- 22) 194, 28, 090) 42, 885 66 23 154} 4, 350}122, 285} 216, 995 56 
Mo tales es 2104 462)108, 045] 168, 185 64 19 388] 10, 394/364, 095] 574, 847 63 
Loudon: meray Fal | SN oe TAGES Con 
Resident ______- 62 530! 39, 723) 58, 041 68|22 ees 307/19, 438]426, 723] 569, 277 75 
Nonresident_-_- 41 987| 24, 358} 29, 248 So aes 155} 7, 853)132, 356} 149, 538 88 
Dotalastas= 103} 1, 517) 64, 081) 87, 289 (Peaks 462)27, 2911559, 079} 718, 815 78 
Resident ______- 29 266} 19,475} 24, 886 78 18 160} 7, 156)146, 035} 191, 426 7 
Nonresident--_- 13 60} 3, 550 3, 591 99 27 226)15, 885)225, 080) 312, 425 72 
Total_____- 42 326] 23,025} 28, 477 81 20 386]23, 041/371, 115) 503, 851 74 
1 Sources of data: Number of properties, areas, and assessed values from town records. Appraised values 
by experts temporarily attached to the Fcrest Service through the cooperation of the New Hampshire 
State Tax Commission. , Properties in Fremont and Richmond were appraised individually in the field; 
those in Loudon in the office by comparison with sample individual appraisals and sales. Assessment 
ratios computed from assessed and appraised values. Coefficients of dispersion computed from assess- 
men ratios of the individual properties in each group, weighted by appraised value, as explained in the 
ext. 
21 property assessed at $100 and with consideration of $75, without any area. 
