AN ANNOTATED LIST OF GENERIC NAMES OF THE COCCOIDEA 29 



Chionaspis Signoret but later, 1952a: 6, placed it in synonymy with Greenaspls 

 MacGillivray, 1921, first on the alleged grounds that the two genera have the same 

 originally designated type-species, Chionaspis elongata Green, 1896, which is not 

 true ; later, on the basis that he had examined authentic material of the types of 

 both genera and that he considered them to be congeneric, which probably is 

 correct. As Ferris pointed out, Greenaspls has page priority. Balachowsky, 

 1954e : 171-172, assigned both genera to his Diaspidina, group II, chionaspiform, 

 apparently without recognition of Ferris' previous conclusion regarding their 

 identity. He also suggested that Greenaspls MacGillivray has a relationship to 

 Pinnaspis Cockerell. 



Canceraspis Hempel, 1934, Bev. d Ent, [Sao Paulo] 4: 141. 



type-species : Canceraspis braslllensis Hempel, 1931, by original designation 

 and monotypy. 



Lepage, 1938: 432, synonymized this generic name with Liniacoccus Bondar, 

 1929 : 59, and placed braslllensis in Liniacoccus. Hempel proposed the subfamily 

 name Cancer -aspidinae for Canceraspis although Lepage, 1938: 432, placed this 

 genus in the Phoenicococcidae. 



Cannococcus Borchsenius, 1960, Ent. Obozr. 39 : 932. 



type-species : Cannococcus cannlcola Borchsenius, 1960, by original designa- 

 tion and monotypy. 



Borchsenius placed this genus in the Pseudococcidae close to his Kiritshenkella 

 and Neotrionymus. 



Capulinia Signoret, 1875, Soc. Ent. de France Ann. [Bui. Ent.] (ser. 

 5) 4: ccxx; 1875, Soc. Ent. de France Ann. (ser. 5) 5: 27. 

 type-species : Capulinia sallei Signoret, 1875, by monotypy. 



Its describer suggested that this genus associates with a group which he called 

 the Acanthococcites. Cockerell, 1899m : 277, placed the genus in his Eriococcini. 

 MacGillivray, 1921 : 210, assigned it to Cylindrococcinae, as did Balachowsky, 

 1948b : 257. Ferris, 1955a : 224, 1957b, 66-67, after a study of the type-species, 

 concluded that the genus cannot be placed comfortably in any accepted higher 

 unit of coccid classification although he did suggest a possible relationship to the 

 Australian genus Opisthoscelis Schrader. Hoy, 1963, New Zeal. Dept. Sci. and 

 Indus. Res. Bui. 150 : 7, referred this genus to the Eriococcidae. 



Cardiococcus Cockerell, 1903, Ann. and Mag. Nat, Hist. (ser. 7) 11: 

 155. 



type-species : Cardiococcus umbonatus Cockerell, 1903, by original designa- 

 tion. 



The describer suggested a relationship with Ingllsla Maskell in the Coccidae 

 (str.). 



Carpochloroides Cockerell, 1899, Entomologist 32 : 12. 



type-species : Carpochloroides viridis Cockerell, 1899, by monotypy. 



The describer suggested a relationship with Capulinia Signoret and Cylindro- 

 coccus Maskell for this genus. Ferris, 1957c : 84, considered that it belonged in 

 the Eriococcidae and Hoy, 1963, New Zeal. Dept. Sci. and Indus. Res. Bui. 150 : 

 7, agreed. 



