AN ANNOTATED LIST OF GENERIC NAMES OF THE COCCOIDEA 97 



Inschionaspis Barreda, in Herrera et al., 1901, Mexico Comis. de 

 Parasitol. Agr. Bol. (1900-1903) 1: 125-128, 222. 

 A "formula" name without status in zoological nomenclature. 



Ins-coccus Herrera et al., 1903, Mexico Comis. de Parasitol. Agr. Bol. 

 (1900-1903) 1:456. 

 A "formula" name without status in zoological nomenclature. 



Ins-dactylopius Herrera et al., 1903, Mexico Comis. de Parasitol. Agr. 

 Bol. (1900-1903)1:457. 

 A "formula" name without status in zoological nomenclature. 



Insiceryas Herrera et al., 1903, Mexico Comis. de Parasitol. Agr. Bol. 

 (1900-1903)1:5,457. 

 A "formula" name without status in zoological nomenclature. 



Inslechanius Herrera et al., 1903, Mexico Comis. de Parasitol. Agr. 

 Bol. (1900-1903) 1:207-208,457. 

 A "formula" name without status in zoological nomenclature. 



Insmytilaspis Herrera et al., 1900, Mexico Comis. de Parasitol. Agr. 

 Bol. (1900-1903) 1:6. 

 A "formula" name without status in zoological nomenclature. 



Insneolecanius Herrera et al., 1903, Mexico Comis. de Parasitol. 

 Agr. Bol. (1900-1903) 1:457-458. 

 A "formula" name without status in zoological nomenclature. 



Inspseudococcus Herrera et al., 1903, Mexico Comis. de Parasitol. 

 Agr. Bol. (1900-1903) 1: 458. 

 A "formula" name without status in zoological nomenclature. 



Insulaspis Mamet, 1950, Inst. Sci. de Madagascar, Mem. Ser. A, 4 : 

 32-33. 



type-species : Lepidosaphes vermiculus Mamet, 1937, by original designation. 



The author considered this genus close to Aonidomytilus Leonardi 

 and definitely separable from Lepidosaphes Shimer. Balachowsky, 1954e: 28, 

 30, placed the name in synonymy with Lepidosaphes. 



Ischinaspis Kuwana, 1917, A Check List of the Japanese Coccidae, 

 p. 18. 



A lapsus for Ischnaspis Douglas. 



Ischnafiorinia MacGillivray, 1921, The Coccidae, p. 372. 



type-species : Fiorinia oamousae Maskell, 1896, by original designation and 

 monotypy. 



Ferris, 1936a : 22, 25, accepted this as a valid genus and, 1937e : 529, rejected 

 Lindinger's, 1937: 187, assertion that it equaled Fiorinia Targioni-Tozzetti. 



