88 A LIST OF THE BUTTERFLIES OF BORNEO. 
Mt. Kina Balu (Waterstradt) : North Borneo (Sar. Mus.). 
Distribution: India, Ceylon, Burma and Penang. 
294. Spalgis nubilus, Moore. 
Spalgis nubilus, Moore, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. p. 522 
(1883) 
Sandakan (Pryer) ; Labuan (Walhnes). 
Distribution: Ceylon; the Andamans and Nicobars. 
De Nicéville, Druce and Swinhoe follow Moore in treating 
this species as distinct from epius, but Bingham treats it as a 
closer relation under the title of * race.” 
Genus, 'TarakaA, de Nicéville. 
295. Taraka hamada, Druce. 
Miletus hamada, Druce, Cist. Ent. Vol. I. p. 561° (1875). 
Mt. Kina Balu (Waterstradt). 
Distribution; Sikkim to Malay Peninsula and Archipelago ; 
China and Japan. 
Doherty, quoted in Butterflies of India Vol. IL, p. O¢, says: 
~ So tar as I know, the ie of this genus occur in the low- 
country ; they are found in forest, and are very weak and moth- 
like in flight.” In view of this it would be of interest to know 
at what altitude Waterstradt took this species on Kina Balu. 
Genus, LycaENopsis,’ Felder. 
Sub-genus, Volarthrinus, Chapman. 
296. Lycaenopsis (Notarthrinus) musina, Snell. 
Cyanwis nvusina, Snellen, Tijd. v. Ent. XXXYV. p. Ito 
(1892). 
Mt. Kina Balu (Waterstradt) ; Sarawak: Paku, Mt. Matang, 
Mt. Santubong—2,600 ft. (Sar. Mus.). 
Outside Borneo it has been recorded from Sumatra and Java. 
The Indian examples recorded under this name by de 
Niceville and Bingham have been recently described by Swin- 
hoe-(Lep. Ind. Vol. VIL p. 205, pl. 619: figs) Si7as pee 
under the name musinoides. Chapnian vlaces this ae ie 
visionally in the genus Nolarthrinus, and says of it “...... 
musing would be an ancestral form, hardly yet a Lye aenopsis.” 
Very common on the summit of Mt. Matang on some davs. 
296a. Lycaenopsis (Notarthrinus) musina lugra, H. H. Druce.: 
Cyaniris lugra, H.. H..Druce, Proc: Zool socymsonmaay: 
Sool, OOOUE ies oe Bo (CIS). 
Mt. Kina Balu (Waterstradt). 
Chapman regards it as “a geographical race of musina.” 
Ils AD ae Abs vals Ghapmen has shown how the name Lycaenopsis, Feld. has prio- 
rity over the long-used name, Cyantris, Dalm. I havetherefore used it here and 
also followed Dr. Chapman’s valuable paper (Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 1909, pp. 
419-476) for the classification of this genus. 
Jour. Straits Branch 
