228. 
i) 
N 
‘Oo 
230; 
231; 
232.4 
Doo. 
234. 
239: 
236. 
231, 
238. 
and Charles M. Ek. 1944. Cor- 
relation of microclimatic factors with species dis- 
tribution in Shenk’s Woods, Howard County, 
Indiana. Butler Univ. Bot. Studies 6: 87-101. 
ge. Corand wd Ene Potzeery a9 32a: 
Studies in forest ecology. I. Factors concerned in 
hemlock reproduction in Indiana. Butler Univ. 
Bot. Studies 2: 133-144. 
and J.E. Potzger. 1932b. 
Studies in forest ecology. II. The ecological 
significance of Tsuga canadensis in Indiana. Butler 
Univ. Bot. Studies 2: 145-149. 
and J. E. Potzger. 1934, Climax 
conditions and ecological status of Pinus strobus, 
Taxus canadensis and Tsuga canadensis in the Pine 
Hills region of Indiana. Butler Univ. Bot. Studies 
3: 65-83. 
oe ands Jee, Potzger., 1936. Soil 
moisture and the nature of the Tsuga and Tsuga- 
Pinus forest associations in Indiana. Butler Univ. 
Bot. Studies 3: 206-209. 
a. and J, Bo Potzger: 1937; Con: 
trasts in certain physical factors in Fagus-Acer and 
Quercus-Carya communities in Brown and Barthol- 
omew Counties, Indiana. Butler Univ. Bot. Studies 
4: 1-12. 
—— = and J) EB. Potzger, 1944. Suc 
vival of hemlock seedlings in a relict colony under 
forest conditions. Butler Univ. Bot. Studies 6: 
102-115. 
Frolick, A. L. 1941. Vegetation of the peat lands 
of Dane County, Wisconsin. Ecol. Monographs 11: 
117-140. 
st ~SC fe apd’ FD, Keim, 1933, Native 
vegetation in the prairie hay district of north cen- 
tral Nebraska. Ecology 14: 298-305. 
and W.O. Shepherd. 1940. 
Vegetative composition and grazing capacity of a 
typical area of Nebraska sandhill range land. Univ. 
Nebr. Agr. Expt. Sta. Res. Bull. 117. 
Fuller, George D. 1935. Postglacial vegetation of 
the Lake Michigan region. Ecology 16: 473-488. 
10 
241. 
242. 
243. 
244. 
245. 
246. 
247. 
248. 
249. 
250. 
Zab: 
252: 
—_—___——_. and P.D. Strausbaugh. 1919. 
On the forests of LaSalle County, Illinois. Trans. 
Ill. Acad. Sci. 12: 246-272. 
. Gates, F.C. 1912a. The vegetation of the beach 
area in northeastern Illinois and southeastern 
Wisconsin. Bull. Ill. Lab. Nat. Hist. 9: 255-272. 
1912b. The vegetation of the 
region in the vicinity of Douglas Lake, Cheboygan 
County, Michigan. Annu. Rpt. Mich. Acad. Sci. 
14: 46-106. 
1926. Plant succession about 
Douglas Lake, Cheboygan County, Michigan. Bot. 
Gaz. 82: 170-182. 
—— 1930) Aspen ‘association: sin 
northern Lower Michigan. Bot. Gaz. 90: 233-259. 
ss |, 1939: Trends of tree:misration 
in Kansas. Trans. Kans. Acad. Sci. 42: 127-132. 
©“... The. bogs of northem 
Lower Michigan. Ecol. Monographs 12: 213-254. 
Getz, Lowell L. 1960. Standing crops of herba- 
ceous vegetation in southern Michigan. Ecology 
41: 393-395.. 
Gilbert, M. L. 1953. The phytosociology of the 
understory vegetation of the upland forests of 
Wisconsin. Ph.D. Thesis. Univ. of Wis., Madison. 
a Sand J. T: Curtis:1953;;Relation 
of the understory of the upland forest in the 
prairie-forest border region of Wisconsin. Trans. 
Wis. Acad. Sci. 42: 183-195. 
Gleason, H. A. 1907. On the biology of the sand 
areas of Illinois. I]. A botanical survey of the 
Illinois River Valley sand region. Bull. Ill. Lab. 
Nat. Hist. 7: 149-194. 
—____-——«:1909. Some unsolved problems 
of the prairie. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 36: 265-271. 
= * +1910, The vegetation: of thes 
inland sand deposits of Illinois. Bull. Il. Lab. Nat. 
Hist. 9: 23-174. 
1912. An isolated prairie grove 
