ENGINEERING SKILL OF SPIDERS. PANS, 
taut to capture prey, as indicated by the number of victims entangled in 
its meshes. It was so firmly implanted, and so opportunely repaired, that 
Prof. Parona was able to observe it continuously for eight days. The in- 
terest of the observer was so much enlisted in what seemed to be an inter- 
esting and novel fact, that he made various inquiries and researches as to 
previous records, 
Among others, he communicated his observation to the veteran arach- 
nologist, Professor Thorell, requesting his opinion thereupon. The ques- 
tion was submitted by Professor Thorell to myself, as lying 
within the line of my special studies of life habits, and I re- 
turned for answer substantially some of the facts which have 
been recorded in this chapter. Nevertheless, Professor Parona has done 
well to place his observation upon record, and he has fortified it by like 
observations from other authors. Among these is the experience of Pro- 
fessor Pavesi, in part as above. He quotes a second observation in the 
same line made by Ninni, on the web of Epeira umbratica, as recorded in 
the Acts of the Society of Natural History of Veneto-Trentina.! This 
spider wove her snare under the roof of a beehive, and gave it 
Professor 
Parona. 
a stability by carrying down a thread to the soil and wrapping 
i ra’ it around a pebble which was raised to the height of about 
seven inches (about eighteen centimetres) from the ground. De- 
siring to know if such ingenious work were confined to that case, the 
author destroyed the web and waited to see how the spider would behave 
in the face of the difficulty that it had previously overcome. Three days 
afterward he saw the web built in the same manner as before, but more 
perfectly finished. As though conscious that without another point of at- 
tachment the construction of her snare would be impossible, the spider 
carried down a thread which was maintained in a taut condition, not with 
one pebble as before, but with two pebbles and a straw. From this line, 
as an initial foundation line, she constructed the framework of her orb in 
the shape of an isosceles triangle, within which the orb was spun, in a 
position well sheltered from wind and rain. In order further to test the 
matter, the author destroyed this second web, but awaited the spinning of 
a third one in vain, as Umbratica abandoned the site. 
It is to be observed that in this case also the testimony is defective, 
in that the observer did not see the spider actually using the pebble as 
a counterpoise; that is to say, in the act of suspending it upon 
the line. In point of fact, what possible benefit could have 
been obtained from staying the orb by a pebble hanging above the ground, 
when an attachment to the solid earth below in the usual manner, or to 
Cui bono? 
1 Sopra la tela dell’ Epeira umbratica: Atti Soc. Veneto-Trentina di Se. Nat. Padova ; 
1876; Vol. 8, pages 204-5; Tay. VI.e VII. I regret that the particular number of this jour- 
nal in which the reference is made does not happen to be in the library of our Academy 
of Natural Sciences, and I have not, therefore, been able to consult the original. 
1x > 
eee 
