5k AccouNT oF a Discoyvray ors 
Varivo d hatams-bhava—Mahishd wyptindhantamale, 
Parsharaéd himég hangm, 
Abhyarsha. mihanam—Devanam vilimam Ghasa, 
Abhivajim ittarsravah, 
Twam ach,han chévamasi—Tadid artham divéedivé, 
Indotwena asisah. 
Tue sixteenth Chanda of the fourth chapter of the Pavamadnam, con- 
sisting of Anushtup and Gdyatriya stanzas intermixed : 
Pavasyd simam anda; yann— I. ndraya méd juitmattimah, 
Asrigram dévi vildy’ E—Vajayantd ratha tv, 
Tescdta sma dintimas —Catea var yum “asricshata, 
Gravnatam no ab hish’ iitah—Pawiltram soma gachchasi, 
Did:hah stottésit viryam, 
~Eshatiim no abihish’tittah —P avittram atig chile, 
RacshoW awaram anyayam. 
» A comparison of these extracts with those from. the Purdnas and 
Pseudo-Védas, will shew, that in. the former, ‘the proper measure, 
according to-the rule laid:down for the Anushtub. Vrittam-of the Véda, is 
every where preserved and that this differs essentially: from the measure of 
the Puranas, with which-that of the Pseudo-Védas exactly corresponds ; 
the only difference being, that the general rule for the composition of the 
Sléca-Vrittans is more untformly followed in the'latter, than in the formers. 
In. these observations on the style of the genuine Vedas compared ‘with: 
that of the Puranas and PseudoeVédas, 1. have confined myself to the- 
