USES AND SUPPLY OF WOOD. 



21 



tures in the State is found in Table 17. Most of it is converted into 

 shoe lasts and golf heads. 



Table 17. — Annual consumption of wood for miscellaneous products. 



Kind of wood. 



Quantity. 



Average 











cost per 



1,000 feet 



f. o. b. 



factory. 



Total cost 

 f. o. b. 

 factory. 



Grown in 



Arkansas. 



Feet b. m. 



Per cent 

 of total. 











Per cent. 



4,050,000 



23.63 



$9.95 



$40, 300 



75.31 



3, 682, 000 



21.48 



7.08 



26, 060 



82.35 



2, 100, 000 



12.25 



8.10 



17,000 



100. 00 



2,057,000 



12.00 



8.01 



16,472 



29.27 



2,001,000 



11.67 



10.00 



20, 000 



100. 00 



800, 000 



4.67 



12.00 



9,600 



100.00 



661,000 



3.86 



7.12 



4,708 



100. 00 



575, 000 



3.35 



12.00 



5,800 



30.43 



500, 000 



2.92 



12.50 



6,250 



100. 00 



250, 000 



1.46 



33.00 



8,250 



100.00 



164, 000 



.96 



20.00 



3,280 



100.00 



150, 000 



.87 



10.00 



1,500 



100. 00 



50,000 



.29 



10.00 



500 



100.00 



50, 000 

 25,000 



.29 



120. 00 



6,000 

 300 





.15 



12.00 



100. 00 



25, 000 



.15 



10.20 



255 



100.00 



17,140,000 



100. 00 



9.70 



166,275 



79.26 



Grown 



out of 



Arkansas. 



Red gum 



Cottonwood.. 



Tupelo 



Elm 



Ash 



White oak . . . 

 Shortleaf pine 

 Longleaf pine 



Sycamore 



Persimmon . . 



Hickory 



Hackberry . . . 



Locust 



Osage orange. 



Cypress 



Red oak 



Total... 



Per cent. 

 24.69 

 17.65 



""""70." 73 



69.57 



100.00 



20.74 



LUMBER CUT AND MANUFACTURED PRODUCTS. 



Table 18, which is based on statistics of the lumber cut contained 

 in the Census Bulletin entitled " Forest Products of the United States, 

 1909," and reports from Arkansas manufacturers, shows that 59.04 

 per cent of the lumber cut is further manufactured in the State. 

 Though the lumber cut is for the year 1909, and the figures for the 

 manufactured commodities are a little more than a year later, the 

 comparison is probably as accurate as if the figures for the sawmill 

 output and manufactured products w T ere for exactly the same period, 

 since a great deal of the lumber cut in 1909 was remanufactured in 

 1910. 



