in his notes in the Vdfana>bhajhya s cites the test of Brahmi'gupta and 

 Chaturve'da's reafoning, which he tries to confute. His quotation 



agrees perfectly with the prefent text of the Brabme-Jphu^a-fidikdnia 

 and commentary of Gkaturve'ba JfaMnv'®A6A Swami, which is an* 

 flexed to it. 



The paflage, which. hat required fo mmh preparatory -emanation, is 



itfelf ihort. ... 



- - M 





\ 



9 The Carna, or longefi fide of the triangle, multiplied by the Peri° 

 jphery of the epicycle and divided by Radius, becomes the multiplier 

 of the Sine and Cofineof Anomaly* 7 The fame 5refult,a§ before, is ob- 

 tained by a fingle operation in the Inflanee of the Anomalifiick epicy» 

 sic i and therefore Carna is not here employed,? 



Bha'scara's words in. the S%r6man% are thefes f Some fay 9 that in 

 fthis fyftera, in the operation of finding the Equation of Anomaly, the 

 Carna or long fide of the triangle is not employed, becaufe the 

 rencc in the two modes of computation is very inconfiderable. 

 others maintain, that, if the Carna beufed* the Periphery of the epi- 

 cycle muft in this operation be corrected,- by multiplying it by Carna 

 and dividing by Radius. Wherefore the refult is the fame as by the 

 former method % and on that account* they fay, the Carriais not em- 

 ployed. It is not to be objected, why is not the fame method ufed 

 nnthe Sighra epicycle i For the principles of the two differ.; 



