330 ■' SANSClllT INSCRIPTIONS AT ABU. 



Even if this were admitted, the variety of names is not to be reconciled, and the 

 Bhoja of Dhdr, and of our inscriptions, must be different persons. It is worthy 

 of notice, hov/ever, that the Ujjayiji inscriptions, which name UdayadItya 

 and his descendants, make no mention of Bhoja, and it seems rather singular, 

 that the Madhukara inscription should omit the name of Munja, Bhoja's 

 predecessor. It may be observed alsOj that the Bhoja Cherilra, as quoted by 

 Major Tod, calls the sons of Ehoja, Deva Raja and Vachha Raja (p. 224). 

 In our list, we have aNARAVERMA, and the next name, Kirttiverma, is of pre- 

 cisely the same import, as the Yasoverma of Major Tod's inscription. Whe- 

 ther they are the same, cannot be averred, and the resemblance of names goes 

 no further than in these two instances out of the five, which occur in the C7/- 

 jai/m grants, (p. 231.) 



From the possession of Jrbuda, by Samara Sinha, the last on the Guhila 

 roll, the district of Chandravali had probably been made the reward of his 

 aid to the Guzerat prince. This district, however, whether as an indepen- 

 dant principality, or a fief, did not long remain with this family, and Chandrd- 

 vati, with the mountain Arhuda^ came under the power of the Chauhan^ Lund- 

 HA Deva, in a. d. 1321 : the final subversion of the Guzerat kingdom, by the 

 Mussulmans, no doubt having paved the way for the dismemberment of that 

 monarchy and its dependencies, by every petty aggressor. We may probably 

 extend this line, by adding to it other two prhices, as Teja Sinh and his son 

 Kahnara Deva, who was lord of CJiaiidr avail, in Samvat, 1394' (a. d. 1338.^ 



Beyond this date we cannot trace, with any continuity, the fortunes of 

 the holy mountains. It has, no doubt, since undergone a frequent change of 

 masters, the record of which belongs to modern history, and may, no doubt, 

 be easily traced upon the spot, if it should be thought to merit investigation. 



