Table A6.— Pooled analysis of covariance between 

 eastern and western Georges Bank for identical 

 months and years. 



Table A8— Pooled analyses of covariance between 

 Georges Bank and the Western Bank of Nova Scotia 

 for identical months and years. 



Total 



Common 



Within 



Between regression 

 coefficients 



Between adjusted means 



Approximat* test 



Larqe 



Haddock 









2 541 



19.f>47 



0.0077 





2537 



19.224 



0.O076 





2533 



19.207 



0.0076 





4 



0.017 



O.O042 



s 



4 



C.423 



0.1056 



Large Haddock 



Adjusted means 



Areas 0.1058 (df = 4) p = 1 

 Samples 0.0624 (df a 29) 



Scrod Haddock 



Total 



Common 



Within 



Between regression 

 coefficients 



3etween adjusted means 



Approximate test 

 Areas 0.1115 (df - 4 



72 5 



5 



125 



0.0071 



721 



4 



679 



. 0O6 5 



717 



4 



64 5 



0.006 5 



4 







034 



0.OOB5 



4 







44t 



0.1115 



Adjusted means 



Samples 0.0532 (df = 5) 



Table A7.— Analysis of covariance between Browns 

 Bank and LaHave and the Western Bank of Nova 

 Scotia. 



Source of variation DF 





ss 



MS 



F 



Large Hadd 



:>ck 



108 



.0074 





Total 149 



1 





Common 148 







972 



.0066 





Within 147 







945 



.0064 





Between regression 











coefficients 1 







02 7 



0.0270 





Between adjusted means 1 







136 



0.1360 





Approximate test 









Areas 

 Regression coefficients 



Samples 



0270 

 0081 



(df = 

 (df = 



11 F =3 

 29) 



3,3 NS 



Areas 

 Adjusted means — 



1360 



(df = 



l > F = 2 



18 NS 



Samples 0.0624 (df = 29) 



Scrod Haddock 



Total 99 



0.606 



0.0061 





Common 98 



0.526 



0.0054 





Within 97 



0.526 



0.0054 





Between regression 









coefficients 1 



0.000 



0.0000 





Between adjusted means 1 



0.080 



0.0800 





Approximate 



test 







Areas 

 justed means — 



.0800 (df = 



l) F=l. 



50 NS 



Total 1219 



9.276 



0.0076 



Common 1215 



8.266 



. 0068 



Within 1211 



8.229 



0.0068 



Between regression 







coefficients 4 



0.037 



. 0092 



Between adjusted means 4 



1.010 



0.2525 



Approximate test 







Areas 0.2525 (df = 



justed means 



Samples 0.0624 (df = 



4) F =4 

 29) 



05 •• 



Scrod Haddock 







Total 



Common 



Within 



Between regression 

 coefficients 



577 4.785 



574 



571 



4.069 

 3.996 



Between adjusted means 3 



Approximate test 

 Areas 0.0243 (df = 3) 



0.073 

 0.716 



0.0083 

 0.0071 

 0.0070 



0.0243 

 0.2386 



Regress ion 

 coefficient 



Samples 0.0206 (df = 5) 



Areas 0.2386 (df = 3) 



Adjusted means „ , F = 4.49 NS 



Samples 0.0532 (df = 5) 



Table A9.— Analysis of covariance between months for 

 large haddock from Georges Bank. 



Source of variation DF SS MS 



Total 



Common 



Within 



Between regression 

 coefficients 



Between adjusted means 



Regression coefficient 



4957 



50.996 



0.0103 



49 50 



38.230 



0.0077 



4943 



38.090 



0.0077 



7 



0.140 



0.0200 



ns 7 



12.766 



1.8237 



Approximate 



test 





Months 0.0200 



df = 7) 



F = 1.85 NS 



Samples 0.0532 (df = 29) 



Adjusted means 



Samples 0.010S(df = 29) 



Months 1.8237(df = 7 ) p = 2 9 2 

 Samples 0.0624(df = 20) 



12 



