The outstand 

 many years the n 

 that section. By 

 years ago, but un 



In North Car 



In South Car 

 Georgia. 



In Tennessee 

 portion of the Sta 



Throughout 1 



In Oklahoma 

 northern portion < 

 lated but fairly iii 



In Texas a sli 

 It then runs nortl 

 northwestern corn 

 It then crosses H 

 County. 



In Oklahoma 

 through Sickles ii 

 County. It then 

 then through Rals 

 County and passe 

 enters Sequoyah ( 



In Arkansas t 

 across Franklin C' 

 Zack in Searcy C« 

 burne, WTiite, an< 

 wh( 



61 . aOI.idO 'JNIX> 



J[ai?)r> TTT ar»nt?iaTavH 



Table I shows the gains and losses in territory du 

 Table I. — Total arec 



State. 



EY 



Texas 



Louisiana 



Oklahoma 



Arkansas 



Mississippi 



Alabama 



Florida 



Tennessee 



Georgia 



South Carolina . 

 New Mexico . . . 

 North Carolina . 



Total.... 



1 This table does not include the ne 



Table II gives a distinct idea of the importance < 

 tion of production throughout the country has been sn 

 distributed \\4thin eachState between the infested a 



Table II. — Proportion of cotto 



State. 



Texas 



I/Ouisiana 



Florida 



Arkansas 



Oklahoma 



Tennessee 



Mississippi 



Alabama 



Georgia 



South Carolina 



North Carolina 



Missouri 



Arizona i 



California 



Vireima 



All others 



Total 



Weighted ;ivcrage 



1 This table do 



In Table II it is shown that only 8.5 per cent o 

 per cent is produced outside the wee\dl line, and in 

 shows practically complete infestation, as it produces < 

 only 14.8 per cent is produced in the uninfested sectic 

 crop in that State. Considering the cotton-producing t 

 crop is produced in uninfested territory. This shows 



Wp arp indpbtpd to Prof. Franklin Sborman and • = 



WASHINGTON : GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : 1921 



