Form No. 3A (Rev. Sept. 30, 1970) 

 Forest-Range Environmental Study - 1970 



Sequential Code Number 



RESOURCE OUTPUT ESTIMATES AND COSTS BY MANAGEMENT STRATEGY FOR A RESOURCE UNIT 



Filled In 



By Washington Office 



CODE 2 



9 3 J / 



12 3 4 5 1 









/ 











Ecosystem { 1 . 2)_ 



Productivity Class (3)_ 



9 10 11 12 13 

 ^ Condition Class (4)_ 



Ownership (5) 



IscMovat/ foteiC 































PRODUCTS 





DO NOT USE 



- 



r. 



^ 



■*■ 



^ 



-o 



r- 



CO 



0-- 



o 



- 



f>J 



:; 



•* 



■^ 



■^ 



r~ 



2 



Z 



o 



fvj 



oj 









MANAGEMENT 

 STRATEGIES 





<: 



~ "J 

 ^ 



g s 



01 



u 



■o 3 





 o 



^ 2 







gi 



U 



5? 5 



ll 



0} 



g S 



>. o 

 j: 

 a. c 



g 5 



M c 



> 

 2 



'o 



in 



Q 



T3 

 U 



E 

 Z 







a 



c 

 }- 



U 



> 



"c 



< 



> 



1 







w 



g 



li 



u 



o 

 Z 



> 



a 



3 

 p: 



C 

 



0) 



0) 



o 



1 



O 



3 



Q 



13 

 U 



Exploitative 



X 





























0.3 







0.0 



6 











.3 



0.0 











0.3 







0.3 







0.3 



; 



5.0 







0.0 



5 



! 



; 



1 



/ 



^i/ 





Z 



Z 



2 



2 



2 



<!/ 





Y 



No grazing 



A 































0.5 







0.0 















0.0 



0.0 











0.2 



3 



0.2 







O.J 







8.5 







0.0 







1 



3 



3 



^ 



3 



/ 





5 



3 



5 



3 



3 



3/ 





Y 



Some livestock 



B 













I 

















0.3 







0.0 



1 











0.1 



0.0 











0.2 







0.2 







0.1 







8.3 







0.0 



1 



1 



3 



3 



/ 



3 



2 





4 



4 



4 



4 



3 



3/ 





Y 



Extensive mgt. 



C 





























0.5 







0.0 



5 











0.2 



0.0 











0.2 







0.2 







0.1 







8.3 







0.0 



5 



1 



4 



4 



4 



3 



2 





3 



J 



3 



3 



3 



3/ 





Y 



Intensive mgt. 



D 































0.3 







0.2 















1.8 



0.0 











0.1 







0.1 







0.1 







8.3 







0.1 



8 



2 



4 



4 



5 



4 



2 





2 



2 



3 



J 



3 



3/ 





Y 



Maximum mgt. 



E 































0.4 







0.3 















1.8 



0.0 











0.0 







0.0 







0.0 







1.6 







O.l 



7 



2 



2 



2 



2 



5 



23 



2 



2 



^ 



/ 



2 



2 



/ 





Y 



n£) r- CO o^ o • 



1 sO r- CO CT- CT" O 



Date Completed: 



Sub-Team Leader: 



/ J// 2/70 



Figure 7. — Form used to record resource responses. 



surement technique. About half were quantified 

 in familiar terms, while the rest were evalu- 

 ated by a qualitative rating system from 1 

 (bad) to 5 (excellent). 



All the land base data were taken from exist- 

 ing inventories kept by the various Federal 

 agencies. Collection of data, both for the strat- 

 egies and output responses, involved personnel 

 from three Forest Service program arms — the 

 National Forest System, State and Private For- 

 estry, and Research — and many disciplines. 

 Values for each product were estimated, based 

 on the culmination of and response to manage- 

 ment strategies. This assumes that the vari- 

 ation in time lags among resource units, to- 

 gether with the long-range policy horizon, will 

 have no significant effect on model solutions. 



REFERENCES 



Kaiser, H. F., et al. 



1972. Forest-Range Environmental Production An- 

 alytical System (FREPAS), 1972. Agr. Handbook 

 No. 430, U.S. Gov't. Print. Office, Washington, D.C. 



Kiichler, A. W. 



1964. Potential natural vegetation of the contermi- 

 nous United States. American Geographical So- 

 ciety, N.Y. Special publication No. 36, 116 p., with 

 map; revised in 1965 and 1966. 



1970. The National Atlas of the United States. 

 U.S. Dept. of the Interior, p. 89-91. 

 The University of Idaho 



1969. The Forage Resource, Vol. 2, Public Land Law 

 Review Commission. 

 Stevens, S. S. 



1958. Measurement and Man. Science. Vol. 127, No. 

 3295, p. 383-389. 

 USDA Forest Service 



1965. Timber trends in the United States. Forest 

 Resource Report No. 17. 



1967. Geographic forest types used in the Forest 

 Survey. USDA Forest Service Handbook 4813.1, 

 Sec. 74, March 1967. 



U.S. Department of Agriculture 



1971. Basic Statistics — National inventory of soil 

 and water conservation needs, 1967. Report of the 

 Conservation Needs Inventory Committee of the 

 USDA Stat. Bui. No. 461, 211 p. 



Water Resources Council 



1968. The Nation's water resources. U.S. Government 

 Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 3 p. 



18 



