APPENDIX D— BASIC STATISTICS, ALTERNATIVES 



The following nine tables provide additional 

 data for the alternatives, especially for Alter- 

 native 19. These data illustrate the type and 

 quantity of detail available for all of the alter- 



natives. The data used in the text are sum- 

 maries of this data. Data elements and totals 

 may not agree because of rounding of the 

 detailed data. 



Table 54. — Forest-range grazed by strategy, and outputs and costs, for Alternative 19 by ecogroup 



[Totals may not add due to rounding] 



Item 



Unit 



Ecogroup 



Western 

 Range 



Western 

 Forest 



Great 

 Plains 



Eastern 

 Forest 



Total 



Percent grazed 



Acres grazed, total 



Management strategies 



No livestock (A) 



Some livestock (B) 



Extensive management (C) 



Intensive management (D) 



Maximize livestock (E) 



Exploitative management (X) 



Outputs: 



Herbage 



AUM production 



Animal output value 



Employment 



Wood 



Water yield 



Water quality 



Storm runoff 



Sediment 



Soil stability 



Soil quality 



Air quality 



Beauty 



Flexibility 



Rare species 



Non-game birds 



Carnivores and raptors 



Hunting 



Other recreation 



Depressed area impact 



Resident cultural heritage 



Nonresident cultural heritage 



Total cost 



Cost per AUM 



Cost per acre 



Million ac. 



do. 

 do. 

 do. 

 do. 

 do. 

 do. 



Million tons 



Millions 



Million dol. 



Million manhours 



Billion cu. ft. 



Million ac. ft. 



do. 



Million inch 



Million tons 



Qualitative ^ 



do. 



do. 



do. 



do. 



do. 



do. 



do. 



do. 



do. 



do. 



do. 



do. 



Million dollars 



Dollars 



Dollars 



75 

 313.8 



104.7 

 61.0 



136.2 

 75.5 

 41.1 



154.7 



77.9 



f 673.3 



93.7 



0.6 



100.2 

 92.0 



131.1 

 1,142.4 

 2.1 

 3.0 

 3.5 

 3.1 

 3.4 

 3.4 

 3.5 

 3.6 

 3.3 

 2.7 

 1.1 

 3.0 

 3.2 



235.8 

 3.03 

 0.75 



48 

 77.3 



83.3 

 32.6 

 31.0 

 13.7 



53.5 



13.6 



115.7 



12.5 



5.6 



176.2 



166.4 



71.8 



95.2 



4.3 



3.3 



4.0 



3.2 



3.7 



2.9 



3.3 



3.2 



2.8 



3.0 



1.0 



3.2 



3.6 



48.6 



3.57 



0.63 



97 

 223.0 



5.9 



16.7 



155.6 



26.6 



24.1 



44 

 174.8 



218.6 

 45.4 

 36.7 



92.7 



152.4 

 96.1 



807.9 

 86.4 



19.4 

 5.5 

 165.0 

 266.5 

 3.6 

 4.0 

 3.2 

 4.0 

 3.9 

 4.4 

 4.0 

 4.0 

 3.7 

 3.9 

 1.0 

 2.5 

 4.1 

 234.5 

 2.44 

 1.05 



205.5 



132.1 



,137.4 



81.8 



14.3 



484.3 



463.3 



510.2 



20.2 



4.3 



4.7 



3.3 



3.1 



3.3 



3.0 



3.2 



3.0 



3.0 



2.8 



1.1 



3.1 



3.9 



523.6 



3.96 



2.91 



789.1 



412.5 

 155.8 

 359.5 

 208.6 

 65.2 



566.1 



319.7 



$2,734.3 



274.4 



20.5 



780.1 



727.1 



878.1 



1,524.3 



3.4 



3.8 



3.5 



3.3 



3.5 



3.4 



3.5 



3.5 



3.2 



3.0 



1.1 



3.0 



3.6 



1,042.5 



3.26 



1.32 



^ The numerical 5-point scale used to measure these outputs was : 5 — Excellent, 4 — Good, 3 — Fair, 2- 

 and 1 — Bad. 



-Poor, 



139 



