by L. F. Spath. 43 



the thickness. T. subepigonus, J. Boehm, 1 also seems close to the 

 present form, perhaps owing to crushing ; but in the Pondoland 

 example, the number of auxiliary saddles cannot be determined for 

 exact comparison. 



4. — Tetragonites aff. cala, Forbes, sp. 



1906. Tetragonites sp. aff. cala (Forbes), Woods, loc. cit. p. 335, pi. 



41, fig. 7. 

 1915. Tetragonites cfr. cala (Forbes) Yabe : "ftote on some Cret. 



Foss. fr. Anaga, etc." Science Rep. Tohoku Imp. Univers. 



2nd ser. (Giol.), vol. iv, no. 1, p. 16, pi. i, f. 7 ; pi. iii, f. 2. 



The inner whorls of the present example agree with the slightly 

 more involute specimen figured by Woods, and have one constriction, 

 at a fairly late stage, on the test, and a closely comparable suture-line. 

 There is a fragment of a larger outer whorl (body-chamber) attached, 

 but its mode of preservation is poor. 



The Valudayur specimens in the British Museum, including Forbes' 

 and Kossmat's types, have numerous constrictions on the inner whorls, 

 both on the shell and on the cast, whereas in the Pondoland form, the 

 constrictions are not marked on the test, though present on the cast. 

 Otherwise there is perfect agreement with the Pondicherry form. 



T. kingianum, Kossmat, var. involutior, Paulcke, 2 is a considerably 

 fatter form. 



Genus PSEUDOSCHLCENBACHIA, Spath. 



5. PSEUDOSCHLCENBACHIA PAPILLATA (Crick MS.), Spath. 



Plate VI, figs. 2a, b. 

 1921. Spath, loc. cit. pp. 240 k 242. 



The present species is distinguished from P. umbulazi, Bailey sp., 

 by being more widely uinbilicated and much more coarsely ornamented, 

 the seven prominent umbilical tubercles being present already on the 



1 In Boehm. & Heim. : " Senonbild. d. O. Schweizer Alp." Abh. Schw. Pal, 

 Ges. vol. xxxvi, 1909, p. 52, pi. i, figs. 5 and 10. 



2 loc. cit. (1905), p. 174, pi. xvii (viii), fig. 4. 



