﻿ON SOME LYllAMORPHA-SPECIES. 



51 



Notwithstauding the different development of the spines 

 I think this specimen can be referred, as Horvath did with 

 regard to the figures, to L. amhigua. I find not uufrequently 

 that there is some variation in the length of these spines, 

 even in Li/ramorjjha. 



New Guinea (evidently the Dutch territory) can thus 

 be added to the known habitats of L. amhigua Horv. 



Brussels, March 6, 1908. 



I^Jotes from tlie Leyden Museum, Vol. XXX. 



