127 



CARLOT UNLQftOS OF GRAPES. PEACHES AND PLUMS IN 100 U. S. AND 5 CANADIAN CITIES BY STATES OF ORIGIN DURIN6 1956 





SRAFB 



rucHxs 



• PLOMS 



CITT 



CAIIT 



0T^8__ 



•nr 



r.ii.TT 



^T-" 



Oft 



S Q 



nmtTB 



Ban . 



CALIT 



I"*"" 



.to. 



OtHM 



KTIL, 



AkrOD, Cbio 



22 















_ 



6 



_ 



- 



_ 







Albany, 1. I. 



20 7 



1 



1 3 



1 



- 



1 4 



5 1 



2 2 



101 



17 



1 3 



5 



- 



35 



Altotsa, Fk. 



4 3 



« 



- 



- 



— 



. 



— 



- 



. 



— 



- 



— 



— 



- 



Amnuo, Ikiu 



~ 



_ 



- 



1 



— 



_ 



- 



1 



2 



— 



- 



— 



- 



- 



Atlanta, Sa. 



268 



1 



- 



13 



- 



1 



11 



4 



2 9 



2 5 



5 



1 



- 



3 1 



Baltlaorc, Hd. 



44 5 



5 



- 



- 



- 



4 7 



2 



1 



68 



98 



1 6 



6 



- 



120 



B»v»ont, *iaa 



-. 



- 



- 



- 



— 



- 



— 



— 



. 



— 



- 



— 



— 



- 



Blmlnehaa, Ala. 



68 



- 



- 



7 



- 



- 



- 



6 



1 3 



6 



2 



1 



- 



9 



BoBtco, »toas. 



149 8 



1 4 



2 



3 4 



1 2 



45 



20 3 



25 



321 



3 37 



5 6 



1 8 



2 



4 13 





9 R 



_ 



- 



9 



- 



1 



30 



3 



4 3 



1 6 



1 2 



1 



- 



2 9 



Buffalo, H. r. 



393 



3 



- 



1 1 



- 



39 



65 



17 



13 2 



53 



20 



2 1 



- 



9 4 



Butt*, Mont. 



1 



- 



- 



1 5 



- 



- 



- 



2 



17 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



Cbarleiton, S. C. 



50 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



1 



- 



- 



- 



1 



cn^rliston, tf. »k. 



2 6 



- 



~ 



- 



- 



- 



- 



— 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



CHarlotte, I. C. 



58 



- 



~ 



6 



- 



- 



— 



2 



8 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



QKttano09, %nn. 



30 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



— 



- 



- 



1 



- 



— 



— 



1 



Chicago, 111. 



1823 



29 



8 7 



30 9 



4 5 



112 



79 



71 



703 



4 80 



20 1 



4 7 



19 



7 4 7 



Cincinnati, Ctiio 



4 30 



1 3 



14 



1 9 



- 



4 4 



9 



1 3 



99 



72 



1 6 



1 4 



2 



104 



Cleveland, Cbio 



67 



1 t 



17 



32 



— 



49 



3 3 



9 



14 



129 



4 7 



1 4 



3 



19 3 



rnl.->,(... 3. C. 



15 8 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- . 



5 



1 



- 



- 



6 



Coliatbua, Ohio 



y 4 



- 



1 



1 7 



1 



4 



- 



2 



34 



5 



- 



- 



- 



5 



Dallaa, Texas 



24 



- 



- 



2 



2 



- 



- 



20 



2 4 



1 



10 



1 



— 



1 2 



Efcvenport, loiA 



27 



- 



1 



2 1 



1 3 



- 



1 



1 



37 



1 



- 



1 



- 



2 



Daytai, Chlo 



23 



- 



1 



- 



■- 



- 



- 



- 



1 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



Decatur, 111. 



8 





~ 



- 



~ 



- 



— 



— 



- 



— 



- 



- 



- 



- 



Denrer, Colo. 



17 



5 



- 



1 9 



66 



- 



— 



7 



9 2 



10 



B 



1 



2 



21 



Dea Hoinea, low 



13 



_ 



1 



75 



63 



- 



- 



- 



139 



— 



1 



2 



- 



3 



>troit, mch. 



10 34 



1 6 



6 2 



60 



- 



7 5 



lis 



26 



3 3 9 



214 



65 



1 



4 



29 3 



3ulutii, mnn. 



SO 



- 



- 



28 



1 6 



- 



- 



1 



4 5 



17 



- 



4 



- 



21 



El Paao, Tmi^M 



— 



1 



- 



- 



- 



- 



— 



3 



3 



— 



. 



— 



- 



- 



Evanarllle, Ind. 



14 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



— 



1 



— 



- 



r 



Flint, Mich. 



40 



- 



a 



2 



- 



- 



3 



1 



8 



3 



1 



1 



1 



6 



Fort WaToe, lod. 



13 



- 



- 



- 



- 



1 



4 



- 



5 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



Fort Worth, TtoM 



1 



- 



~ 



~ 



- 



- 



- 



4 



4 



— 



- 



— 



— 



• 



anoi ikplda, mch 



7 9 



- 



- 



— 



— 



- 



6 



- 



6 



4 



. 



— 



- 



4 



Hartford, Cocn. 



337 



• 



4 



1 4 



- 



6 



7 2 



1 5 



111 



46 



1 4 



3 



— 



63 



EouBtoo, Texaa 



40 



- 



3 



2 1 



10 



2 



- 



22 



5 8 



1 2 



20 



6 



1 



39 



HiBtlngtoo, w, Va. 



46 



- 



1 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



1 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



Indlaaapolla , TnA. 



187 



4 



1 



1 



- 



4 



- 



- 



2 4 



1 



1 



1 



- 



1 2 



JaciucE, Hill. 



- 



- 



~ 



~ 



~ 



" 



~ 



1 



1 



- 



- 



- 



— 



- 



JackacBTllIe, rU. 



114 



- 



- 



4 



- 



- 



2 



1 



7 



2 5 



9 



6 



- 



40 



Eanaas City, Mo. 



58 



2 



1 1 



24 



32 



- 



- 



38 



10 5 



11 



3 3 



4 



1 



49 



KnoxTllle, Tenn. 



51 



- 



~ 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



Lexlngtoc, Kj. 



1 



- 



~ 



~ 



~ 



- 



~ 



~ 



- 



— 



- 



— 



- 



- 



Lincoln, Sebr. 



- 



- 



- 



9 



2 5 



- 



— 



3 



3 7 



- 



4 



- 



1 



5 



Little Bock, Ark. 



— 



- 



~ 



- 



1 



- 



- 



2 



3 



2 



- 



1 



— 



3 



Loa An^lea, Calif. 



69 



- 



- 



S 



- 



- 



- 



- 



5 



2 



3 4 



- 



- 



36 



LoulsTllle, Ity. 



110 



1 



1 



2 



— 



3 



1 



- 



7 



— 



- 



— 



— 



- 



Lublxxk, Tfcma 



- 



_ 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



Hadlsix, Wis. 



4 5 



_ 



- 



39 



37 



. 



1 



1 



7 8 



5 



. 



3 



— 



8 



Memphis, Tem. 



54 



_ 



- 



1 





. 





6 



•? 



- 



- 





- 



- 



Miami, Fla. 



147 



1 



- 



- 



— 



2 



1 



1 



4 



2 6 



1 9 



3 



— 



48 



mlwukee, Wii. 



31 2 



4 



27 



103 



12 6 



1 



2 2 



5 



284 



58 



25 



1 7 



— 



100 



NlmKapolii-St.I^iil, Mi 



232 



9 



- 



317 



2 2 1 



- 



1 



1 5 



5 5 4 



57 



2 



3 7 



2 



9 8 



Mobile, Ala. 



9 



_ 



- 



1 



— 



- 



— 



1 



2 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



■aabrille, ftm. 



10 5 



1 



- 



2 



— 



1 



2 



— 



5 



— 



. 



— 



— 



. 



RevKik, I. J. 



752 



_ 



- 



2 



- 



19 



8 4 



2 



107 



114 



4 5 



1 3 



- 



17 2 



■ev B»en, CCOB. 



22 8 



_ 



- 



- 



1 



1 



39 



1 4 



S 5 



11 



7 



1 



- 



1 9 



■ev Orleana, La. 



19 8 



9 



1 6 



4 4 



1 



• 



— 



25 



- 8 6 



23 



- 



- 



- 



2 3 



m Toik, 1. Y. 



4 5 4 



313 



1 9 



12 1 



1 



2 6 8 



2 6 8 



74 



751 



1293 



427 



10 7 



7 



18 9 7 



■orfolk, «k. 



6 8 



1 



- 



- 



— 



y 



— 



— 



2 



d 



- 



- 



- 



2 



Oakland, Calif. 







- 



- 



— 



. 



— 



— 



. 



— 



1 



- 



~ 



1 



CklahCM City, Okla. 



2 1 



_ 



- 



10 



14 



. 



- 



1 3 



3 7 



7 



7 



1 



- 



1 5 



rmtix, Itebr. 



2 8 



. 



1 



5 



6 6 



. 



- 



17 



134 



4 



1 8 



2 



3 



2 7 



Peoria, 111. 



4 



_ 



2 



- 



— 



. 



— 



1 



3 



- 



. 



— 



- 



. 



Fblladelpiiia, Ri. 



1415 



17 



- 



12 



- 



69 



70 



5 



156 



357 



127 



4 4 



5 



5 3 3 



Ricenlx, Arix. 



11 





- 



5 



— 



* 



— 



- 



5 



1 



1 



— 



- 



2 



Plttaburgh, fa.. 



10 60 



10 



37 



16 



1 



8 2 



7 6 



2 



2 14 



19 5 



7 3 



2 3 



3 



294 



Portlaod, mioe 



39 



_ 



- 



1 



_ 



. 



12 



3 



16 



4 



. 



— 



- 



4 



Fortla^, drag. 



50 



. 



- 



1 4 



- 



- 





1 



1 5 



4 



- 



- 



- 



4 



PrCTTidence, R. I. 



215 



2 



2 



- 



1 



1 4 



65 



16 



$8 



26 



5 



5 



- 



3^ 



SOeigh, I. C. 



10 5 



, 



- 



3 



- 



- 



~ 



5 



8 



8 



- 



- 



- 



8 



Sichwnd, Va. 



9 7 



_ 



- 



2 



- 



- 



— 



- 



2 



3 



- 



— 



- 



3 



aoanoke, V». 



56 



_ 



— 



- 



— 



. 



— 



- 



- 



- 



- 



— 



— 



- 



Rochester, ». T. 



143 



. 



13 



1 



- 



3 



1 7 



7 



41 



3 



- 



- 



- 



3 



St. Louis, Mo. 



416 



6 



38 



28 



1 



7 



2 



1 4 



90 



58 



7 2 



1 2 



2 



144 



Salt lake City, Utah 



2 



. 



- 



4 



- 



- 



- 



2 



6 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



San AntODlo, Tejas 



3 



- 



3 



4 



2 



- 



- 



3 3 



4 2 



6 



12 



1 



- 



19 



San Diego, Calif. 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



San FrancUco, Calif. 



4 4 



- 



- 



1 



- 



- 



-r 



- 



1 



- 



4 



- 



- 



4 



SciantCQ, Pa. 



211 



a 



22 



- 



1 



9 



2 2 



4 



5 8 



32 



27 



8 



— 



6 7 



Seattle, liash. 



70 



- 



- 



12 



— 



. 



— 



1 



13 



5 



- 



— 



— 



5 



Shroeport, la. 



1 



- 



- 



- 



- 



. 



- 



4 



4 



- 



1 



- 



- 



1 



Sioux City, Iowa 



3 



. 



2 



140 



69 



. 



— 



4 



215 



— 



6 



1 3 



- 



19 



Sioux Fklls, S. D. 



_ 



_ 



- 



5 9 



11 



_ 



- 



2 



7 2 



1 



. 



3 



_ 



4 



South Bend, Ind. 



1 



_ 



- 



- 



» 



_ 



— 



- 



. 



_ 



« 





_ 





Spokane, 4ash. 



7 



_ 



- 



4 



- 



_ 



- 



- 



4 



» 



_ 



_ 



_ 



. 



Springfield, Mass. 



143 



_ 



- 



- 



- 



3 



34 



6 



4 3 



1 5 



6 



3 



_ 



2 4 



Springfield, Mo. 



16 



_ 



- 



- 



- 



. 



- 



4 



4 



1 



6 



_ 



_ 



7 



Syracusa, H. T. 



20 



- 



2 



5 



- 



4 



3 5 



10 



46 



8 



. 



2 



_ 



IQ 



T&cmB., '*sh. 



4 



_ 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



- 



. 



— 



. 



— 



- 







8 8 



. 



- 



- 



- 



. 



- 



- 



. 



1 8 



1 



3 



_ 



2 2 



lerre &ute, iDd. 



12 



_ 



2 



_ 



_ 



. 



_ 



_ 



2 









.. 





Toledo, Chlo 



63 



- 



5 



2 



- 



- 



1 1 



- 



1 8 



6 



. 



- 



_ 



6 



Topeka, Kansas 



2 



. 



3 



2 



29 



- 



— 



6 



4 



1 



18 



- 



1 



2 



Tulsa, Ckla. 



8 



- 



- 



2 



9 



- 



- 



1 



2 1 



1 



2 



1 



- 



4 



■dashingtOD, D. C. 



228 



2 



- 



8 



- 



1 



- 



1 



1 



24 



3 



- 



- 



2 7 



Wichita, Kansas 



— 



- 



- 



9 



2 6 



- 



— 



1 4 



4 9 



_ 



36 



1 



1 



2 8 



Wllkes-Barre, i*. 



6 2 



- 



6 



- 



- 



6 



1 6 



.T 



3 



14 



5 



4 





2 3 



TouiAStouu. Olio 



137 



- 



4 



- 



— 



- 



5 



- 



9 



2 



3 



_ 



_ 



S 



. TOTAL 



20 391 



isi 



4 4 4 



17 9 4 



a 3 



94 



1484 



C 54 



6 219 



399 6 



1539 



476 



12 3 



6 134 



Mootreal, Qas. 



940 



2 36 



1 n 



4 7 



- 



4 



i£;2 



20 4 



42 7 ■ 



155 



11 



12 



Si 



225 



Otta«, CBt. 



9 6 



2 1 



1 



- 



— 



- 



4 4 



20 



6 5 



11 



_ 



1 



1 



1 3 





12 8 4 



2 5 



30 



34 



- 



_ 



7 5 



3 



14 2 



8 4 



7 



8 





9 9 



Vancouver, B. C. 



39 



- 



- 



16 



- 



« 



- 



5 



2 1 



6 



_ 



2 



1 



9 



Winnipeg, Man. 



127 



48 



- 



48 



8 



1 



2 



50 



10 9 



19 



_ 



35 



54 



10 8 



TOTAL 



a 4 a 6 



3 3 



4 1 



14 b 







28 3 



28 2 



7 64 



275 



18 



5 8 



107 



45 8 



laclodea frvah Pronet. 



