125 
— N. Grayi Jenm. — St. Lucia. — I. 
“4 N. uatjeae Schrad. — Brazil. De $e 
2 N. Lilloi Hicken, Anal. Soc. cient. Argentina 63: 8 cum tab. 1907; Dryopteris Lilloi C.’Chr. Ind. Suppl. 34. 
. 1913. — Tucuman, LiLLo nr. 2932. — Probably a aietines species, in habit os D. connexa, 
a but indusiate; perhaps an ally of D. nemophila. 
e N. longipilosum Sod. Sert. Fl. Eeuad. II. 26. 1908; Dryopteris ‘Tongipilosa C. Chr. Ind. ‘Suppl. 35. 1913. — 
= Ecuador. — I. 156 
N. negligens Jenm. — Jamaica. — I. 131. 
ee N. oppositum Fée. — OS —- I 195. 
E N. paucijuga Jenm. — Jam I. 196. 
2 N. poireti Desv. Bian 258. 1: Polypodium pubescens Poir. Enc. 5: 546 (non L.) — Martinique. — D. 
patens? 
N. raddi Desv. Prod. 258. 1827. — i — D. patens or D. oligophylla? 
N. rigescens Sod. — Ecuador — I. 1 
N. subfuscum Bak. — Guiana. — I. 8 ; 
- Peltochlaena nephrodiiformis Fée. — Guiana. — I. 81. 
Phegopteris amplificala Fée. — a — I. 272. 
Ph. Blancheliana Fée. — Brazil. — I. 
Ph. ciliata Fée, Gen. 248. 1852. — ane Latibit no. 270. — I. 272. 
Ph. clenoides Fée, 11. mém. 54 t. 14 f. 2. 1866. — Sto. Domingo, pe Tussac. — By JENMAN adopted as a 
good species, also found in ae but probably the same as D. rudis; see my first paper p. 326. 
Ph. fluminensis Fée. — Brazil. — I. 
Ph.? inaequalis Fée, 8. mém. 91. 1857. — Mexico. SCHAFFNER no. 240, 240 b, 241 a. — By Fournier, Mex. 
pl. 1: 98, referred to D. equestris, but it is said to be arborescent with a spiny trunk; can it be an Al- 
sophila? 
Ph. leptoptera Fée. — Sto. Domingo. — I. 156. 
Ph. melanorachis Fée. — Mexico. — I. 272. 
Ph. organensis Fée, Cr. vasc. Brés. 1: 105. 1869. — Rio. — GLaziou no. 2821. — ? 
Ph. perforata Fée — supra p. 30. 
Ph. pilosula Fée, 8. mém. 90. 1857, — Mexico, LinpEN no. 126 — t. FourNIER = D. oligocarpa. 
Ph. Sturmii Philippi, Anal. Univ. Chil. 94: 358. 1896; Dryopteris Sturmii C. Chr. Ind. 295. — Chile, prov. 
Valdivia. — Described from sterile specimens. Probably allied to D. subincisa and D. spectabilis. 
Polyecdiae abruptum Desv. Prodr. 239. 1827 — »in Antillise. — ? 
P. ambiguum Desv. Prodr. 242. — Brazil. — According to a fragment in Herb. Berol. this seems to be a form 
of the group of D. eaierne perhaps D. conne: 
P. angustifrons Kze. Linnea 13: 134. 1839. — Mexico, Scie no. 758 a. — According to Mett. Aspid. 65 
this falls under my D. see oe —y be an allied species, if really an Eudryopteris. 
P. colubrinum Vell. Fl. flum. 11 t. 71. — Brazil. — Said to be D. abbreviata. . 
P. daucifolium Poir. Enc. 5: 542. 1804. — Porto Rico. — D. effusa? 
oecundum Vell. Fl. flum. 11 t. 75. ‘pio —? 
P. gracilentum Jenm. — tesa — L. 133. 
P. hirtum Vell. Fl. flum. 11 t. 79. — s dentata or D. Bangii? 
P. involutum Desv. Berl. Mag. 5: ae 1811 — »in Antillis«e — It is very improbable that this is D. hetero= — 
clita, to which it was referred in Index; can it be D. cheilanthoides? 
P. jamaicense Desv. Berl. Mag. 5: 318. 1811. — Jamaica. — Lasirea or Cyclosorus? 
P. lanuginosum Vell. Fi. flum. 11 tab. 70. — Brazil. — D. falciculata? 
