126 
P lepigerum Schrad. — Brazil. — I. 99. 
P. ligustifolium Poir. Enc. 5: 553. 1804. — Buenos Aires, CommErson. — In Ind. Fil. referred to D. den- 
‘ticulata, but I think it is Polystichum adiantiforme sens. lat. 
P. lunanianum Hew. — Jamaica. — I. 278. 
P. eine Vell. Fi. aa . t. 78. — D. patens? 
P. pe um Poir. — 
i ag paeseta Poir < ei 555. 1804 = Aspidium lutescens Willd. sp. 5: 272. 1810. — Both were founded 
Plumer t. 34, illustrating a decomposite species from Sto eee It is probably D. ampla. 
. 2811 
P. resiniferum bia Berl. Mag. 5: - — »in America calidiori«. — D. opposita or D, Sprengelii? 
FP. renee L. sp. 2: 1089. 1753. — Based on Plumier t. 68. — Sto. Domingo. — D. asplenioides? 
related species of mtoheapelee 
Pe ace Vell. Fl. flum. 11 t — Brazil. — Is no doubt D. gongylodes, not at all D. serra, to which it 
ed 
P. sloani Desy. Prodr. 238. — Jamaica. — Founded on Sloane, Jam. t. 29. = D. reptans. 
I. 228. 
P. subulatum Vell. Fl. flum. 11 t. 67. — Brazil. — Lastrea or Cyclosorus? 
P. truncatum Poir. Enc. 5: 534, 1804. — Brazil. — This is generally made the type of the common Asiatic- 
Polynesian Dryopteris truncata (vy. Ind. Fil. 299) but no doubt it is totally different; according to the 
description it seems to belong to § Goniopteris and is probably identical with one described in the 
first part of this monograph. The name fruncata for the Polynesian species is consequently unavailable 
and another specific name must be substituted for it. 
P. Urbani Sod, — Ecuador. — I. 268 
Polystichum cyslopteroides Nees. — Mexico. — I. 69. 
