KURAMOTO & lOSHY— CALLS OF INDIAN FROCS 



95 



Tomopterna nifcscctis. Ampliibia-Rcplilia 21: 

 242-246. 



KaNAMADI, K. I). \'->'->h. Acoustic ciHumiinica- 



lioii in sonic lndi;ni anuiaiis: a ii'\ic\\. /oos' 



I'linl 1 1(8): 26-35. 

 KANAMADI, Is. !)., ('. R. lllKIMMII, II. 



SCHNI 11)1 K. \'ocali/alioii and Iciiitoii- 



aiity ol liic iiklian Iiol' Riiini li/iuKJc/u/ns. 



Proc. Indian Nam. Sci. Acad. H6I: 9-14. 

 KURAMOlo, M. 1975. Mating calls oi' .lapancso 



tree frogs (Rliacophoridac). Hull, l ukiioka 



Univ. I diic, I't. Ill, 24: 67-77. 

 KURAMOto, M. l^tSS. A new frog (genus Rcina) 



from the Rynkyu Island.s. Herpelologica 41: 



150 l.>S. 



KiiK wiolo, M. 19S6, Call siiuctiircs of tlic rha- 

 copliorid lYogs lumi lai\\<in. .Sci. Rep. l ab. 

 Amphibian Hiol., lliioshiina Univ. 8: 45-68. 



1 I'l \ K. \., I S. I \i. \M) ^■. S. Ctll \. IW5. 

 A ncNv l\lhu i>i'hi>ni\ ( Xiiiiia: l\haco|)luii idac) 

 from laiwaii. .1. llcipctol. 29(3): 338-345. 



M.MSl'l, M., 1. Si ill, I. UrSUNOMlYA. 



1986. Acoustic and kai\oi\pic evidence lor 

 specific sepaiaiioii ol inri;(h c/'/i 



(litis from Iciicoinvsiiix. .1. llcipctol. 2(1(4): 

 4S'? 4S9. 



H , V I , /II \( .. |';')2. \ stud\ ol 



vocali/aiioii on ihiitccn species ol lour gen- 

 era, .AiHiia. p M 26. In: Y.-M. .liang (ed.), 

 ( Ollectcd I'aiH'is on Herpctolog\, Sichuan 

 I'uhl. House ol Science and lechnology, 

 t hcng(.lu. 



I'xtit, N. S., R. D. Kanamadi, and S. K. 

 SmdaI'Iir, 1996. Bioacoustics of ihe tree 

 frog, Pliiliiiiiiis IriHDi lii/nis (I.ichten.stcin and 

 Martens). .1. Kaiiiaiak (niv.-Sci. (special 

 is.sue): 97-109. 



Ko'i , I). 1996. Importance ol bioacou.stic 

 analysis in amphibian ta.xoiiomy and conser- 

 vation. Zoos' Print 11(8): 22-25. 



Ro>, I). 1997. (Ominimicaiion signals and 

 se.xual selection in amphibians. Current Sci. 

 72: 923-927. 



Ron, I). \M) \, I M I'l \\i)i, IW93. Bioacoustic 

 analysis ol frog calls Irom northeast India. ,1, 

 Biosci. 18: 381-393. 



Siiioi/, .\. 1999. Treefrogs of Africa. Chi- 

 maira, i-ranklurt am Main. 3.'^() p. 



ScHNi 11)1 R, U. \\i) I . si\st It. 1992. Mating 

 call variation in lake frogs referred to a.s 

 Riifni rulihii/uiu Pallas, 1771. Z. Zool. Syst. 

 I \oluiionsrorsch. 30: 297-315. 



WiiiN, K. I). 19"" I he ci)urtship of frogs, p. 

 233-262. //;; D. H. laylor and S. i. Guitman 

 (eds.). The Reproductive Biology of Amphib- 

 ians, I'lennm Press, N. Y. 



/II \(), L.-.M. 1999. Distribution patterns of 

 amphibians in temperate eastern .Asia. p. 

 421 44V //;: W I Duellman (ed.). Patterns 

 of Distribution ol Amphibians. Johns Wop- 

 kins Univ. Press, BaUimore. 



AiW'picd: 25 Svpicinln-r 2001 



