Table 3.— Summary of test data for DAP-treated ponderosa pine needle fuel beds (from George 

 and Blakely 1972) 





Treatment solutiom 





Anhydrous 



Rate of 













chemical 



flame 



Rate of 



Chemical 



Solution 



Solution 







spread 



weight loss 



by weight 



density 



quantity 



DAP 



P2O5 



R/S 



R/W 



Percent 



g/cm' 



g 



ml 



— - g/ff 







/ t/min 



glmin 



Z.O 



1.014 ' 



975 



962 



2.03 



1.09 



1 .HO 





d.O 



1.014 



965 



952 



2.01 



1.13 



1 .DO 







1.014 



955 



942 



1.99 



1.07 



1 .00 







1.014 



1000 



986 



2.08 



1.12 



1 7n 





D.U 



1.029 



1035 



1006 



4.31 



2.32 



1 .00 



or\t\ 

 e.\io 



o.u 



1.029 



995 



967 



4.15 



2.23 



1 97 



1 ou 



o.u 



1.029 



990 



962 



4.12 



2.22 



1 .uo 





o.u 



1.029 



1000 



972 



4.17 



2.24 



1 9R 





o.u 



1.029 



980 



952 



4.08 



2.20 



1 '^Q 



1Q1 



1.0 



1.042 



1000 



960 



6.25 



3.36 



1 "^R 

 1 .oD 



lou 



1.0 



1.042 



1010 



969 



6.31 



3.39 



1 91 





1.0 



1.042 



975 



936 



6.09 



3.28 



1 9^ 



^uu 



7 ^ 

 / .0 



1.042 



1025 



984 



6.41 



3.45 





1 1 u 



1 u.u 



1.056 



1020 



966 



8.50 



4.57 



89 



1 DO 



1 u.u 



1.056 



995 



942 



8.29 



4.46 





17A 



1 1 H 



1 n n 

 1 u.u 



1.056 



1055 



999 



8.79 



4.73 



7^ 



1ft1 



1 n n 

 1 u.u 



1.056 



1010 



956 



8.42 



4.53 







1 9 R 



1.072 



1010 



942 



10.52 



5.66 



RQ 



10 1 



1 ^.0 



1.072 



965 



900 



10.05 



5.41 



70 

 . 1 u 



147 





1.072 



1050 



979 



10.94 



5.89 





111 

 1 1 1 



1 o.u 



1.084 



1025 



946 



12.81 



6.89 



09. 



77 



1 o.u 



1.084 



960 



886 



12.00 



6.46 



Rft 

 .DO 



n7 



1 D.U 



1.084 



1000 



923 



12.50 



6.73 



.ou 



10Q 



1 o.u 



1.084 



990 



913 



12.38 



6.66 



.00 



ini 

 lu 1 



1 / .0 



1.108 



1050 



948 



15.31 



8.24 



9R 



7-1 



17.5 



1.108 



980 



884 



14.29 



7.69 



.37 



94 



17 



1.108 



1015 



916 



14.80 



7.96 





Q7 



17.5 



1.108 



1025 



925 



14.94 



8.04 



.38 



79 



20.0 



1.111 



1005 



904 



16.75 



9.01 



.33 



76 



20.0 



1.111 



1038 



934 



17.30 



9.31 



.24 



63 



20.0 



1.111 



1081 



973 



18.02 



9.69 



.29 





Table 4.— Summary of test data for M-MAP-treated aspen excelsior fuel beds 





Treatment solutiom 





Anhydrous 



Rate of 













chemical 



flame 



Rate of 



Chemical 



Solution 



Solution 







spread 



weight loss 



by weight 



density 



quantity 



MAP 





R/S 



R/W 



Percent 



g/cm^ 



g 



ml 



— - g/fP 





F t/min 



glmin 



2.5 



1.014 



1010 



996 



2.10 



1.30 



2.48 



297 



2.5 



1.014 



1010 



996 



2.10 



1.30 



2.63 



294 



2.5 



1.014 



995 



981 



2.07 



1.28 



2.23 



264 



5.0 



1.029 



1005 



977 



4.19 



2.59 



.57 



113 



5.0 



1.029 



1135 



1103 



4.73 



2.92 



.52 



118 



5.0 



1.029 



1055 



1025 



4.40 



2.72 



1.06 



133 



7.5 



1.042 



1030 



988 



6.44 



3.98 



.60 



103 



7.5 



1.042 



1100 



1056 



6.88 



4.25 



.68 



79 



7.5 



1.042 



1000 



960 



6.25 



3.86 



.73 



120 



10.0 



1.056 



930 



881 



7.75 



4.78 



.74 



117 



10.0 



1.056 



960 



909 



8.00 



4.94 



.43 



82 



10.0 



1.056 



965 



914 



8.04 



4.96 



.40 



83 



5 



