Table 12.— Reduction of untreated fuel combustion rates caused by D-MAP treatment' 



R/S R/W Cumulative 



% reduction R/W % reduction % reduction 



P205 



R/S 1 



2 





1 



2 



1 



2 





Ft/min 





g/min 

















Ponderosa pine 











2.59 



1.47 0.19 



0.30 



162 



0.45 



0.39 







2.70 



1.30 .28 



.31 



170 



.42 



.39 







2.64 



1.35 .25 



.30 



190 



.35 



.39 







5.31 



1.01 .44 



.60 













5.42 



.95 .48 



.61 



136 



.54 



.55 







5.27 . 



.75 .59 



.60 



162 



.45 



.54 









Average 0.37 



0.45 





0.44 



0.45 



0.41 



0.45 









Aspen excelsior 











£..{\ 



U.o4 u./y 



U. / D 













2.67 



.86 .79 



.75 



155 



0.66 



0.67 







2.72 



.57 ,86 



.76 



172 



.63 



.68 







5.24 



.38 .91 



.90 



80 



.83 



.83 







5.27 



.38 .91 



.90 



78 



.85 



.83 







5.25 



.51 



.90 



82 



.83 



.83 









Average 0.86 



0.83 



i 



0.74 



0.75 



.80 



.79 











Total average 



0.61 



0.62 



M = percent reduction of combustion parameters (flame spread rate and weigtit loss rate) for untreated 

 fuel bed rates. 



2 = percent reducton of combustion parameters tfiat are computed using equivalent treatment amounts 

 and data (flame spread rate or weight loss rate) from pooled data curves for DAP, M-MAP, and S-MAP, 



Table 13.— Reduction of untreated fuel combustion rates caused by fK-UkP treatment' 



R/S R/W Cumulative 



% reduction R/W % reduction % reduction 



P20S 



R/S 



1 



2 





1 



2 



1 



2 



g/ft' 



Ft/min 







g/min 



















Ponderosa pine 











2.67 



1.49 



0.18 



0,31 



144 



0,51 



0,39 







2.58 



1.58 



.13 



,30 



162 



,45 



.39 







2.67 



1.26 



.30 



.31 



172 



,42 



.39 







5.37 



901 



.50 



.60 



154 



,48 



.55 







5.27 



.89 



,51 



.60 



143 



,51 



.54 







5.28 



.83 



,54 



.60 



173 



.41 



.54 









Average 0.36 



0.45 





0.46 



0,47 



0.41 



0.46 











Aspen excelsior 











2.64 



0.93 



0.77 



0.75 



135 



0.71 



0,67 







2.65 



.68 



,83 



.74 



125 



0.73 



0,67 







2.60 



.46 



,89 



.74 



80 



.83 



,67 







5.38 



.31 



.92 



.91 



76 



.84 



,84 







5.40 



.41 



.90 



.91 



116 



.75 



.84 







5.25 



.51 



,87 



_90 



74 



,84 



.83 









Average 0.86 



0.83 





0,78 



0.75 



.82 



.79 













Total average 



0.62 



0.63 



'1 = percent reduction of combustion parameters (flame spread rate and vaeigtit loss rate) for untreated 

 fuel bed rates, 



2 = percent reducton of combustion parameters ttiat are computed using equivalent treatment amounts 

 and data (flame spread rate or weigtit loss rate) from pooled data curves tor DAP, M-MAP, and S-MAP, 



11 



