378 



1757. Araneus litera v notatus m., ibid., p. 123, PI. 5, tab. i7 ) 

 1757. „ V NOTATDS id., ibid., p. 154. ^ (=?)• 



1789. Aranea insignita Oliv., Encycl. Meth., IV, p. 220. 

 1789. „ punctata id., ibid. 



1802. „ littrrata Walck., Faune Par., II, p. 247. ) ,q\ 

 1805. Attus litteratus id., Tabl. d. Aran., p. 24. j 

 1805. „ quinque-partitus id., ibid. p. 25 (= <5). 



1833. „ insignitus Sund. , Sv. Spindl. Beskr. , in Vet.-AItad. Handl. 



1832, p. 211. 



1834. Salticus quinque-partitus Hahn, Die Arachn. , II, p. 41, Tab. 



LV, fig. 126. 



1837. Euophrys quinque-partita C. Koch, Uebers. d. Arachn. -Syst., 1, p. 33. 

 1848. „ „ id., Die Arachn., XIV, p. 27 (ad part: 



3), Tab. CCCCLXXIII, fig. 1296. 

 1850. Dia quinque-partita id., Uebers. d. Arachn.-Syst. , 5, p. 64. 

 1856. Attus v-insignitus Thor. , Eec. crit. Aran., p. 70. 

 1861. Salticus nidicolens Cambr. , List of new and rare Spid. , cet., in 



Zoologist, 1861, p. 7945 (=?)')• 



1867. Euophrys striata Ohl., Aran. d. Prov. Preuss., p. 161 (salt, ad part.). 



1868. Attus insignitus Sim., Monogr. d. Attides, p. 64 (54). 

 1870. iELUROPS V-insignitus Thor., On Eur. Spid., p. 219. 



Martyn in his translation of Clerck's work (Aranei, or a Nat. 

 Hist, of Spid. etc., p. 57) had already exchanged the double V em- 

 ployed by Clerck for a single, so that in Martyn's work this spider 

 is called "Ar. V insignitus". In my Eec. crit., loc. cit. , I have for 

 typographical reasons used the same symbol. That the female also 

 (Clerck's Ar. V notatus) has in Martyn (p. 58) received the name 

 Ar. V insignitus, is probably the result of a lapsus calami: no one 

 who has attentively examined Martyn's work, will be like to sup- 

 pose it probable that he was in a condition to discover, that these 

 two species of Clerck's are in fact only the different sexes of one 

 and the same species, which was first shown in my Eec. crit. — 

 The word "litera" in both Clerck's denominations needs not to be 

 considered as an essential part of the trivial name; this is evident 

 from its omission in the register to Clerck's work, where these na- 

 mes are written "Ar. V insignitus" and "Ar. V notatus". Sundevall 

 and Simon call this species "Attus insignitus" , but they thus exclude 

 the very symbol, by which Clerck describes it as marked (insignitus 

 or notatus). 



The name "A. navaria Lister", found among the synonyms of 

 this species in Simon, is not due to Lister but to G(eze, who in his 



l) According to a communication from the Eev. 0. P. Cambridge himself. 



