414 



Attus pubescens = 



,, terebratus = 



„ fasciatus = 



,, stria tus : 



,, sanguinolentus = 



,, arcuatus = 



,, crucigerus = 



floricola = 



,, caricis = 



,, falcatus = 



tigrinus = 



,, cinereus = 



,, cupreus 



,, flavipes 



,, lsetabundus = 



,, frontalis = 



„ heterophthalmus; 



,, striolatus = 



* ,, niger ■ 



„ lapponicus = 



Attus pubescens (Fabr.) 1775. 



,, terebratus (Clerck) 1757. 

 Mlurops fasciatus (Hahn) 182.. 

 Attus striatus (Clerck) 1757. 

 Fhilceus clirysops (Poda) 1761. 

 Attus arcuatus (Clerck) 1757. 

 ,, crucigerus Walck. 1825. 

 „ floricola (C. Koch) 1837. 

 ,, caricis Westr. 1861. 

 ,, falcatus (Clerck) 1757. 

 ,, erraticus Walck. 1825. 

 ,, cinereus Westr. 1861. 

 Heliophanes cupreus (Walck.) 1802. 



,, flavipes (Hahn) 1831. 

 Euophrys pozcilopus Thor. 



,, reticulata (Blackw.) 1853. 

 frontalis (Walck.) 1802. 

 B alius cenescens (Sim.) 1869. 

 Euophrys frontalis (Walck.) 1802. 

 Epiblemum (?) inc. spec. 

 Attus lapponicus (Sund.) 1833. 



Seepag. 381. 



„ 383. 

 „ „ 384. 

 „ „ 386. 

 D 7i 388. 

 „ „ 390. 

 ,, ,, 391. 

 „ „ 391. 

 „ „ 394. 

 ii ii 394. 

 „ „ 396. 

 ,, i, 398. 

 ,i „ 399. 

 402. 

 403. 

 404. 

 404. 

 405. 

 405. 

 405. 

 406. 



ii ii 

 ii ii 



II. 



SYNONTMICAL REMARKS 

 ON SPIDERS DESCRIBED IN BLACKW ALL'S 

 'HISTORY OF THE SPIDERS OF GR. BRITAIN AND IRELAND'. 



In the preceding pages I have gone through all the species de- 

 scribed by Westking in his 'Aranese Suecicse': I have endeavoured to 

 give their most important synonyms, and have appended the names, 

 by which it appears that they ought to be designated. As I have 

 already in the beginning of this work intimated (Conf. On Eur. Spid., 

 p. 2), I have had access to specimens determined by Westring of nearly 

 all these spiders; the few (4), which I have not myself seen, have 

 been marked with an *. As I am now going to make a contribu- 

 tion towards a similar revision of Blackw all's 'History of the Spiders 

 of Gr. Britain and Ireland' , 1 must not omit to mention , that I am 

 by no means in the same favourable situation with regard to that 

 important work; and although the Rev. 0. P. Cambridge (who, as 

 Mr Blackwall himself had the kindness to inform me, has at present 



